REVIEW

Movie Review: Live Free or Die Hard, For Your Hormonal Viewing Pleasure

Written by Carole McDonnell
Published July 22, 2007

Every once in a while - like a persistent guilty pleasure - I feel the need to be overwhelmed by masculinity and testosterone. In this blockbuster-filled summer, between sequels, small romances, and meaningful art pictures, I was hard put to find that man-sweat I’d been longing for. Lanky or beefy, it didn’t matter. All I wanted was to see some guy saving the world from mega-disaster and tossing off memorable macho movie lines. Maybe it has something to do with being peri-menopausal, but dang! I love seeing men do manly stuff. So, “jonesing for sweat,” I finally went to see Live Free of Die Hard

I was pleasantly surprised. More magical than the present Harry Potter film and funnier than any comedy in the theaters, this was hands-down the most fun I’ve had at the movies in a while. Action films are pretty hard to do and they become downright unbelievable or cliched. That said, this film actually works. We see such wondrous feats of supernatural prowess that we cannot help but sit back in joyous befuddlement. Not only does John McClain (Bruce Willis) defy the laws of physics by outrunning and explosions, he is immune to pain, and can almost - just almost - fly! He is also darn funny. Justin Long, who plays his young slacker charge, is equally lucky and equally funny, and equally macho. Oh testosterone! I missed you.

Of course few films are perfect. And Live Free or Die Hard is no exception. In this case, the problem is the villain. I’ve always considered the Die Hard films to be studies in male solipsism and obsession. The typical villain in a Die Hard movie is not only detached, but at the same time passionately focused. They also tend to be funny in a dead-pan, sophisticated kind of way. Who could forget the coldly humorous first villain, played by Alan Rickman? Or the damaged, world-weary, and cynical Jeremy Irons baddie? These guys tend to have issues, and they know how to tell the difference between a dessert fork and a salad fork.

Here, the villain just doesn’t make the grade. First of all, he’s home-grown. American corn-fed. The bad guy here is a really an extreme good guy — someone out to make America safe from evil terrorists, to prove to his bosses they shouldn’t have fired him, and to get a huge hunk of cash in the bargain. All American preoccupations, of course. We don’t get this guy’s political affiliation but if we know how Hollywood stereotypes well, we can pretty much assume he’s a conservative Republican. (I’m surprised they didn’t go so far as to make him a conservative Christian.) Of course most folks who get fired from governmental jobs don’t have the software know-how to actually put such an ingenious plot into action. And an ingenious plan it is — create major chaos by playing around with the software that runs the institutions in our society.

page 1 | 2
Carole McDonnell's short stories and essays appear online and in print, in speculative fiction, ethnic, and Christian publications. She lives in New York with her husband, two sons, and their pets. Wind Follower, published by Juno Books in June 2007, is her first novel.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Live Free or Die Hard, For Your Hormonal Viewing Pleasure
Published: July 22, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Thriller, Video: Crime, Video: Action
Writer: Carole McDonnell
Carole McDonnell's BC Writer page
Carole McDonnell's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Carole McDonnell
Video: Thriller
Video: Crime
Video: Action
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 27, 2007 @ 00:22AM — yeah

geesus...this review reads like it was written by a grade 12 student...

#2 — July 31, 2007 @ 12:56PM — Carole [URL]

Hi there, yeah!

Thank you so much for your dead-on assessment of my review. I do try to hold onto my younger childlike self. Although I write many academic papers and and poetic writing, I figured this film was made for kids...it's a summer flick, after all-- so why not go with childlike glee? Thanks so much for seeing my youthfulness in this review. -C

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/66712)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments