http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:54:30 EDT http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-614930 "No she didn't. Did you not read the part after "and" where she siad she didn't think it was part of the story? One joke does not a story make." She did. It's a movie about a woman who's pregnant. In the scene, she's going into labor. How is the baby's head coming out of her vagina not part of the story? It's no less part of the story than her tits all over the screen when she's having sex with Jake Gyllenhaal in Brokeback Mountain. "Oooo, I am sure she'll be suicidal after hearing that. Lucky for you, no one respects bloggers, so you don't have to worry about people thinking less of you." I never claimed my opinion would make anyone feel anything. I simply stated what it was. And? "btw, Knocked Up was all right, but certainly NOT very good." The reviews and the box office numbers seem to disagree. 614930@blogcritics.org Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:54:30 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-614919 "she contradicted herself." No she didn't. Did you not read the part after "and" where she siad she didn't think it was part of the story? One joke does not a story make. "you just went down a notch on my respect meter" Oooo, I am sure she'll be suicidal after hearing that. Lucky for you, no one respects bloggers, so you don't have to worry about people thinking less of you. btw, Knocked Up was all right, but certainly NOT very good. 614919@blogcritics.org Wed, 25 Jul 2007 16:26:48 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-614753 Perhaps that's the problem,it wasn't her getting naked. Allthough she professes she dosn't activly go after that type of roll,but she has for a very long time been obsessed with nudity, particulary her own. In nearly every interview she gives she refers to her roll in B.M,surprising as she did not appear for 45 minutes and was on screen only for approx 15 minutes in a film over 3 hours long. For all the hype and awards the film attracted the only recognition she got was for her topless scene. She never now talks about TDWP even though it did better at the box office than B.M. When TDWP was first shown at the festival, in a review published it stated "that the shocker came when Anne revealed her breats" but this scene was deleated before release and surprisingly did far better than expected even with Anne's more visule assets, this rather contradicts her statement that she will only bare all if it is neccessary to the story. Funny thing is that when she is able to keep her clothes on, these films seem to do very well. Its allmost as if she were being advised that talking about nudity and saying the she can't Act was good publicity, surely she is not niave. 614753@blogcritics.org Wed, 25 Jul 2007 07:02:44 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-613866 So Hathaway was offended by the gross out scene showing the vagina and the head popping out? Come on now. That wasn't even a sexual shot, it was a "Gross out humor" shot since movies/TV that show pregnancy joke about how it looks down there, but never show it. I can't believe Hathaway turned down this role because of that. She must be really air-headed. Sad because I liked her a lot in the past. 613866@blogcritics.org Mon, 23 Jul 2007 14:43:05 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-613282 Ty, the frontal nudity I'm referring to is the vagina they show at the end of the movie when Katherine's character is in labor. 613282@blogcritics.org Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:21:04 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/07/20/181746.php#comment-613281 "I remember hearing a while back that Anne dropped out of the film and was replaced with Katherine Heigl, but there was never a reason stated as to why, though some speculated it may have been because of the frontal nudity." Katherine Heigl doesn't take her top off in Knocked Up, so how does it have to do with frontal nudity? I think the movie has some frontal nudity, but not from the main actress (in this case, Heigl). I don't get it. 613281@blogcritics.org Sat, 21 Jul 2007 19:18:20 EDT