OPINION

Thoughts About The Sopranos and Some Predictions for the Series Finale

Written by Victor Lana
Published June 08, 2007
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

7. Kevin Finnerty

After Tony was shot and in a coma, we got the story of Kevin Finnerty: legitimate businessman who seemed to have lost his way. Wouldn’t it be a blast that the series ends with Tony getting shot, and as he is dying we switch to a scene of Kevin Finnerty snapping out of his own coma. There has never been a Tony Soprano (or any of the others either). It’s all been Kevin caught in a tornado and falling into the land of The Wizard of Mob. All the times we have heard Tony whining that “this is a business” has really been poor little Kevin’s way to get out and back because there’s no place like home. Hey, if Dallas could have Pam waking up to find the supposedly dead Bobby taking a shower (meaning the whole season was a dream), and Bob Newhart could wake up to find Suzanne Pleshette in his bed (a wife from another series making the entire Newhart series a dream), why can’t David Chase do this? It would be totally unexpected and a real shocker that everyone would hate and never forget.

Well, those are my thoughts of possibilities more than they are true predictions. I hope everyone enjoys the series finale. It will be something long-time fans have to see, and some day everyone else will be able to catch up when it’s on DVD. Until then, we can get the popcorn ready and leave the clean-up for the next morning, because no matter which way it goes, I think some of us will be jumping out of our seats.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Victor Lana has published numerous stories and articles in literary magazines and online, including his favorite haunt here at Blogcritics. His novels A Death in Prague (2002) and Move (2003) and his new book The Savage Quiet September Sun: A Collection of 9/11 Stories are available at online bookstores.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Thoughts About The Sopranos and Some Predictions for the Series Finale
Published: June 08, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Crime, Video: Drama, Video: Television
Writer: Victor Lana
Victor Lana's BC Writer page
Victor Lana's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Victor Lana
Video: Crime
Video: Drama
Video: Television
All Video Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 8, 2007 @ 10:57AM — MIke

I particularly recall one episode where some of Tony Soprano's gang made a big deal about Columbus Day, and it seemed to me incongruous and condescending for these gangsters to be worried about any American holiday, since the essence of their lives was going against the fabric of society and cheating the system to earn a living"

That was the point. Part of the appeal of the show was that it constantly pointed out the characters hypocrisy. There are literally hundreds of examples of this throughout the shows run. David Chase himself always said that 99% of what comes out these characters mouths are lies

#2 — June 8, 2007 @ 20:48PM — Ray Ellis [URL]

Interesting thoughts, Victor. You're a braver man than me. My own feeling is Tony's son will inherit the "Throne", in some sort of allusion to the decline and eventual fall of the Roman empire. Whether Tony lives or dies is almost a moot point. His rule is over, and however it turns out, it will end on a grim note. The power will pass on to a successor, and we'll be left with the feeling that the decadence will live on.

#3 — June 9, 2007 @ 00:31AM — Paul Levinson [URL]

I'm predicting Tony will survive, but Carmela will not ... Soprano Predictions: Tony's Family

#4 — June 9, 2007 @ 08:33AM — Victor Lana [URL]

Interesting idea, Paul. If that is the case, Tony will be is good as dead, and that may be the whole point. If something happens to his wife or one of the kids, Tony has nothing left.

I also like the idea about AJ. Remember, he is his father's son (Tony had those attacks as a kid too). Wouldn't it be weird if AJ surprises everyone just like Michael Corleone. Bang-zoom!

#5 — June 9, 2007 @ 18:50PM — Maureen McCole

Tony is going to find out (maybe from Paulie) that Uncle Junior is his real father. (Junior and Tony's mother had had an affair which produced Tony.) Uncle Junior is not senile but has been acting as if he is to elude jail time. Uncle Junior is the rat who is working with the NY Mob to oust Tony and his crew so that Junior can reclaim the New Jersey Mob Throne denied to him earlier.

Uncle Junior will be the unexpected visitor who will off Tony and will gain control of New Jersey.

#6 — June 9, 2007 @ 19:28PM — Victor Lana [URL]

Maureen, I've thought about that over the years. I don't think Uncle Jun knows it because he wouldn't try to kill his own son, but Livia knew it and that would really make her like Lady Macbeth.

I was wondering if Junior would just fade away in the state facility, but this would be quite an interesting turn.

I'd also bet that Paulie knows lots more than just this. He is going to be key in the finale.

#7 — June 9, 2007 @ 22:09PM — Bradley Varcoe

I like Maureen's comments. I think that Uncle Jun has been avoided this season for a reason. I think that he will be the pinnacle for the series finale. I am not sure how he plays into the the finale, but I know this..... He can not be left to rot in the Psychiatric Hospital. Remember, AJ came to avenge the attempted murder of his father. I wouldn't be surprised if Junior did turn to New York to get revenge for AJ's actions. Although, I also think that the whole set of Kevin Finnerty episodes may mean something in the finale as well. Maybe, Tony see's his death and this is what pulls Kevin Finnerty out of his coma and he wakes to Carmella's face with AJ and Meadow by his bedside. Just a few ideas..... What do you think?

#8 — June 10, 2007 @ 08:40AM — Victor Lana [URL]

I think you're onto something, Bradley. At first I dismissed the whole Kevin Finnerty thing, but it started really getting into my thoughts and the actions (and all the confusion about identity) got me. I wouldn't be surprised by Tony not being Tony. I know people would hate it, but he would have been in a coma and all the seasons were some kind of dream or whatever.

#9 — June 12, 2007 @ 03:57AM — PeterJ

After watching the last episode of the "Sopranos", having listened to all of the hype surrounding the following show, "John From Cincinatti", and keeping in mind the arrogance and thoughtlessness displayed by HBO through its' actions in the past year I immediately went to my pc and cancelled HBO. Gone, for good. I wasn't about to pay for a channel whose programming has turned to showing movies which were past their prime long ago and sophomoric sex shows about cheesy cat houses while truly entertaining and adult shows such as ""Carnivale", "Deadwood" and "Rome" were cast aside.
At least they had the courtesy to inform us and give "Rome" an ending, although I can't grasp why they ended the show prematurely, maybe it was just too deep for them. Perhaps no one told them that there really was a Roman Empire, that it wasn't fiction at all. They didn't need to bust their balls trying to 'figure out' the next season, it was already written out for them in what's called "history books". In any event, for reasons known only to them, "Rome" ended. Not at all like Carnivale and Deadwood. Both shows again, somewhat historically significant, "Deadwood" offering us a glimpse at what the birth of an actual gold town in the midwest was like, "Carnivale" a dark sinister fictional show set in the Bible belt during the Great Depression was also one of the best productions HBO had to offer. We left both of these shows at the end of the season anxiously speculating what next year held in store. With disbelief I heard that the shows were dropped. I searched the internet and sure enough they were gone. How could this be? When you commit yourself to a series you become entwined, you find yourself identifying with characters and the next episode is on your "to do" list. For HBO to thoughtlessly drop these shows as though they owed their paying subscribers nothing was a slap in the face. I wasn't about to so much as spend one more cent in support of these type of tactics.
Oh, I know that this practice had long been established at HBO. Network station CBS had even come to pulling this ploy with a show called "Jericho", although I have a feeling that this action may have been politically motivated.
But I don't have to pay to watch CBS and I no longer have to pay to watch HBO. I have a feeling that I'm not going to miss it one bit.

#10 — June 12, 2007 @ 10:42AM — Victor Lana [URL]

Thanks for the comments, Peter J. I don't understand the rationale for networks and cable TV either. They put a new show on and then yank it off, sometimes after only one or two episodes. I do think shows get more of a chance on cable, but I can't explain what happens when they pull the plug.

I guess it's kind of like when someone wants to end a relationship, even if things are going very well. No matter what, that person has to pull the plug. So, you did the same thing with HBO. ZGood for you!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/65003)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments