<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Trance&lt;/i&gt; by Jorge Luis Alvarez Pupo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 9 Jun 2007 03:05:12 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Richard Marcus on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Trance&lt;/i&gt; by Jorge Luis Alvarez Pupo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/06/05/144307.php#comment-599931</link>
<description>Father Loves Me:

Thank you for your letter and I appologise if I misrepresented or misunderstood aspects of the history and belief system of Santeria. Thank you for supplying readers with those corrections, I appreciate it anyway if nobody else does. 

I&#039;m glad that you did understand that I wasn&#039;t passing judgement and was doing my best to describe the religion(s) as neutrally as possible. I only brought the religion up because of the subject matter of the photographs in the book which are truly amazing. 

I believe you can see samples of some of the work in this book at the link to his web site that I included in the article. As you appear to know quite a bit about the religion you will probably appreciate the photos far more than an unintiated  person like me.

Thanks again

Richard Marcus</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">599931@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Jun 2007 03:05:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Father Loves Me on Book Review: &lt;i&gt;Trance&lt;/i&gt; by Jorge Luis Alvarez Pupo</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2007/06/05/144307.php#comment-599879</link>
<description>I appreciate the tone of the article.  Media in general tends to portray the religion negatively.  My comment centers around the following passage:

&quot;Regla de Ocho &amp;ndash; the Kingdom of Ocho. Ocho was the primary deity of the religion, which chose the name Santeria - way of the Saints - in order to disguise their traditional practices of worship.&quot;

The religion is actually referred to as Regla de Ocha.  Ocha isn&#039;t the primary deity; rather Orichas are primary to the religion.  Oricha is a word for a group rather than a single entity.

Also, the name Santeria wasn&#039;t chosen to disguise anything.  The slave owners in Cuba actually used Santeria as a derogatory term because they believed the slaves were worshiping saints in an extreme fashion.
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">599879@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 9 Jun 2007 00:04:30 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>