OPINION

Pirates of the Carribean: At World's End - Gore Goes Lynch

Written by Jesse Miksic
Published June 02, 2007
page 1 | 2

First, Jack Sparrow's on-screen delirium was very Lynchian. He spent whole chunks of the movie interacting with himself, and frequently murdering other versions of himself. Two of them were little shoulder-mounted Jacks, like the old couple in Mulholland Dr. who were shrunk to the size of a rodent. Others were alternate-reality versions, Jack Sparrows that laid eggs, Jacks that had been assimilated by the Flying Dutchman, Jacks who were into bestiality. There was no good reason for this tendency — just a lingering postmodern sense of the surreal and absurd, giving us reason to ask: just whose head are we wandering around in here?

Second, the recurrent theme of the crabs was like something from David Lynch. Mulholland Dr. also had a few themes that kept coming back into the narrative, like the little box with the key, and these frequently had no clear symbolic significance or obvious associations. There are a number of ways they could fit into the narrative; they could represent something abstract, like deliverance, or they could represent the call of the sea to Jack. They seemed to be metamorphic presences, turning into objects and people and disappearing back into the environment again. They were never capitalized on or made clear; they just showed up and established their surreal presence, and then vanished again.

The mad, forgetful Bootstrap Bill was another strange, surrealist character figure, particularly in the scene where Elizabeth finds him on the Dutchman. He's pathetic and imprisoned in his own uncertainty, caught between mindless loyalty to Davey and futile, misguided hope in his son. Being part of the ship has made him tragic and amnesiac, able to repeat a conversaion as if he's having it for the first time, and it establishes his character as a unique, unpredictable force, both emotionally and narratively. In this sense, he shares a kinship with Mulholland Dr.'s Diane Selwyn, who first appears as a distraught, disturbed, and emotionally crippled actress at a low point in her career.

There's also the sick anatomy stuff that keeps kicking us gently in the face. The scene where Jack's doppelganger licks his own brain is priceless. The death by tentacle lobotomy is pretty brilliant, too. These are the signature scenes of a filmmaker who really wants our attention.

I'm not going to sit here and say I liked Pirates III because it was, like a Lynch film, a profound, avant-garde piece of art cinema, or a masterpiece of surrealist post-modern narrative. But it did share something with Lynch: it was an explosive, ecstatic act of filmmaking, almost childlike in its lack of inhibition.

This is the maelstrom, take it as it is: a mad cinema freakout that none of us could have expected from Gore Verbinski, hard to follow, but insanely engaging on a dramatic and aesthetic level. Don't hold back, Gore. I'm right behind you.

page 1 | 2

Designer | writer | critic | dedicated cultural participant

Loud voices fade. Well-chosen words linger.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Pirates of the Carribean: At World's End - Gore Goes Lynch
Published: June 02, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Adventure, Video: Art House
Writer: Jesse Miksic
Jesse Miksic's BC Writer page
Jesse Miksic's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Jesse Miksic
Video: Adventure
Video: Art House
All Video Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 3, 2007 @ 03:10AM — Claire [URL]

I'm glad I read your review. I was a bit disappointed by the film because of its incoherence. However, I did enjoy all the parts you describe here, so perhaps I wasn't disappointed, simply confused.

#2 — June 3, 2007 @ 08:14AM — Phil Ryan

People seem to forget that movies are about entertainment... at least the film critics too often do. I went to this film with my teenage kids, and we all had a ball: it was great fun! It was crazy silly stupid unreal but fun!

Thanks for the nice intellectual comments on the film though... they will go down well in arguments against the too-stuffy-by-half brigade who would criticize anything just because it is designed as blockbuster.

#3 — June 4, 2007 @ 14:37PM — couch tato [URL]

hmm u bring an interestin view about mullholand dr which i spent a sleepless night tryin to figure it out
i loved this flickbut my main disappointment was introducing too many characters and storylines all in one go which they could have done before

it left me confused and unhappy to say the least...the supersaturated this thing

#4 — June 7, 2007 @ 07:18AM — Mukta

This was a great review.
Before watching it, my husband and I thought that with all the average reviews,this movie must have failed in a way that most sequels do- failing to bring something new to powerful first n second parts.We just went to watch out of loyalty to ol'Jack -to see what he is upto now, but we were surprised. For a change, it wasnt just Dep's creation that held centre stage. The scenes you mentioned were a delightful surprise-providing the perfect combination with Jack's madness,and their pointlessness was refreshing,it was intellectually stimulating and I couldnt even tell why and how before i read your review!

#5 — June 8, 2007 @ 02:00AM — Jesse [URL]

Hey, thanks for the comments, everybody. It's great to see that mass culture hasn't numbed our brains past the point of discussion and mutual appreciation.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/64735)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments