OPINION

Stoudemire, Diaw Suspensions Get The "Tuck Rule" Treatment

Written by Matthew T. Sussman
Published May 18, 2007
page 1 | 2

Three unpopular rules. But nonetheless they are rules, even if we don't like them. (And I don't.) They've certainly been questioned by people before, but never under such a national profile until a moment which mattered most: postseason time. Indeed, the Raiders-Patriots game, the Suns-Spurs series, and my 8th grade spelling bee would have improved in quality had the three instances not occurred. But that's the beauty of competition: seeing the unseen, and complaining about the never-before-complained-about. For every indiscriminant tuck rule that leaves the bench, we fans witness Joe Carter circling the bases. Mike Jones tackling Kevin Dyson at the 1-yard line. Michael Jordan scoring 38 points with the flu. Rebecca Sealfon spelling words, well, like that. Sports oddities happen all the time and are merely amplified when the game has way more on the line. Who remembers A.J. Pierzynski reaching base after striking out in the 2005 MLB playoffs, extending the game?

I probably would not have enforced consequences to Diaw and Stoudemire like David Stern did — probably because I want to see the Suns win this series — but it doesn't matter, because the rules I make and enforce don't extend beyond BC Sports. (At least around here, everyone is held responsible for their own pronunciation gaffes.) Nonetheless, Stern's actions did change the complexion of the series. And Robert Horry, with too many championship rings to fit on a finger, somehow looks like a genius, effectively neutralizing two of Phoenix's primary, albeit playoff-unproven, players with one body slam. How about changing his nickname from Big Shot Bob to Big Slam Bob?

On the day of Game 6, there's no use complaining about the suspensions, because it's come and gone. Suns coach Mike D'Antoni knows this. Thursday afternoon on Pardon The Interruption, during an interview he seemed frustrated yet sympathetic toward Stern's quandary, but the Suns coach knows he must get his team ready for Game 6, and merely — Raiders fans, look away — tuck away memories of Game 5 for now. Because a win on the road in San Antonio tonight would make for one hell of an emotional Game 7, when Robert Horry returns to the lineup. In Phoenix, no less. And if that happens, maybe David Stern could look like the marketing genius. That would rule.

page 1 | 2
Matt SussmanMatt Sussman is the former sports editor of BC Magazine and also writes for Deadspin, SPORTSbyBROOKS, The Futon Report, and the Toledo Free Press. Catch him with Tuffy on Treehouse Fort, the official show of BC Sports.

Feed the feedback back to matt.sussman@blogcritics.org.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Stoudemire, Diaw Suspensions Get The "Tuck Rule" Treatment
Published: May 18, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Basketball
Part of a feature: 2007 NBA Playoffs
Writer: Matthew T. Sussman
Matthew T. Sussman's BC Writer page
Matthew T. Sussman's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Matthew T. Sussman
Sports: Basketball
All Sports Articles
Matthew T. Sussman's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — May 18, 2007 @ 12:02PM — David R Perry [URL]

I'm often reminded of how many rules I just don't know about. Usually during football (where I know very little) but also during basketball (where I know only slightly more). There are way too many for the armchair jockeys to keep track of and I try to keep a keen appreciation alive for how detailed and observant referees must be. As much as we all, myself included, bitch and moan about a ref missing a call, or missing the "heart" of a call, that's a tough job. And whatever team hat I happen to be wearing at the moment is off to them.

That said, I guess I don't see how this suspension is really any different from any other clutch-time call. It could be something as mundane as last possession on an out-of-bounds ball. But when the score is tied and there's only four seconds left in the game, it's a very big deal.

It's not the obscure rule that's the problem or even the issue. Like Matt said, it IS a rule, so there you have it. No, it's more our reaction during the adrenaline of playoff season.

#2 — May 18, 2007 @ 12:53PM — Tuffy [URL]

David, it's a shame the announcers don't acknowledge their ignorance more often. Instead, they're thrilled to jump right in and explain it all away with words stitched together to roughly resemble sentences.

However, I give credit to Bill Simmons for pointing out the flaw in both of these rules: they should not exist in this form or at all. There has been a decade's worth of chances to correct them.

Also, Bill Simmons would surely give Matt a hug and a lollipop for the whole spelling bee debacle, but he's saving this exposé for his new show this fall.

#3 — May 18, 2007 @ 14:23PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Were the NBA a government agency, in a month we'd get some whistleblower hold a tell-all press conference saying he told Stern all along they should have gotten rid of this rule.

#4 — May 18, 2007 @ 15:50PM — Chris McVetta [URL]

A government agency ...or Jason Giambi.

Sorry, I'm all "hopped-up" on Winking Lizard mini-burgers and Blue Moon Summer Ale right now!

Hey, if I ever win one of them "Pulitzer Surprises" ...I'll 'fess up later.



#5 — May 18, 2007 @ 22:30PM — Tuffy [URL]

Let the book tour begin!

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/64109)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments