Who Are The Insurgents?
Published April 29, 2007
Almost everyday the newspapers are filled with accounts of violent activity in Iraq: a. car bomb here, a suicide bomb there, gunfire at a checkpoint, and an outbreak of outright hostilities on occasion. We know the victims of these attacks are usually either Iraqi or American personnel serving in either the armed forces or security services.
The newspapers say it is the work of faceless creatures called insurgents - or even worse, radical fundamentalist Muslims. They never offer any explanation as to possible reasons for these people to be fighting against the American forces that occupy their country except to say that they are insurgents or fundamentalist Muslims - or even scarier, both.
In other words, the only reason they pick up weapons against the Americans is because of who they are, not because of anything that's been done to them. It wouldn't have anything to do with the fact that for the ten years prior to the invasion, the country got steadily poorer as the embargo and the Oil For Food programs steadily stripped the country of any means of generating income to pay for infrastructure, health care, education, and other things we take for granted.
It doesn't have anything to do with hospitals being bombed, museums being looted, and Iraq's natural resources (mainly oil) being sold into private American hands - the money from the sales mysteriously disappearing. The idea had been to sell off Iraq's assets at bargain prices to American interests and use that money to rebuild the country.
If there had been any sign of hope, or progress towards rebuilding, things might be different, but what are people supposed to believe when they read reports of hundreds of millions of dollars going missing that was earmarked for rebuilding? An initial audit from one city showed this happening, and who knows how widespread it's become in the interim.
What would you think if the people who were behind the violence weren't doing it out of some fanatical Muslim belief? What would you think if they were people who were reacting to the treatment they've received at the hands of people they believe don't give a damn for them or their lives?
Put yourself in the shoes of the average twenty-something Iraqi for a few moments. Now add in that you're treated with absolute disdain in your own country by people who can't speak your language, who don't understand or respect your traditions, who constantly yell at you in a language you don't speak, and who tell you what to do and how to behave.
- Who Are The Insurgents?
- Published: April 29, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: History, Culture: Media, Culture: Religion, Culture: Society, Politics: War and Terrorism
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
This article would have generated a lot of good discussion over in Politics. Pity. It fits in rather better there.
But since this is culture, we could look at this as a cultural issue. The reason there are insurgents comes down to a culture which encourages violence against outsiders and nonbelievers. It's a combination of pure culture and religion, which both encourage xenophobia and the perception that non-conformity and foreignness are threatening and should be responded to with violence.
It's a culture of absolutism which condones any action or outrage so long as it is perpetrated against outsiders or those who have transgressed religious or cultural taboos.
That's the root of the problem and that's why there are insurgents.
Dave
As the war in Iraq continues, I find it frustrating that we do not have a good understanding of who these insurgents actually are. Why aren't any of these captured insurgents questioned? I would find it very interesting to listen to what they had to say.
I think that the US government doesn't want its citizens to know exactly what the war is about. It's much easier to label this the "war on terror" and the people of Iraq as mentally deranged or "insurgents". Even the media outlets such as CNN don't give us the whole picture.
We need to ask more questions about why this so called war is even happening. We also need to know more about our so called enemy. Unfortunately, these are the questions that the US government doesn't want asked. As long as this war is kept simplified, public support (albeit small) will continue and more money will be pumped into the bank accounts of Bush and his cronies.


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 






"If my country were invaded by a foreign power, I might fight back with any means at my disposal, too."
Exactly who did we invade prior the 911?
Who had we invaded prior to the 83 barracks bombings in Beiruit?
You want to excuse the unecexcusable Richard.
You whine about how we treat arabs/muslims...well guess what...you know who else doesn't treat them so great? Their own fucking leaders....... why don't they go after them. They're oppressing much more than we could ever hope to. Yasser arafat had billions of dollars and used none of it to better the lives of the palestianins yet tehy idolized him. how do you explain that?