Canadian Politics: No Apology For Residential Schools
Published March 28, 2007
By the year 2005 the federal government of Canada under the Liberal party had agreed to certain measures to redress the issue. Various financial packages were offered, and it was promised as part of the deal that the government would offer an official apology for the policy.
But now the current administration, the Conservative Party of Canada has reneged on that promise. In fact from comments made by the Indian Affairs Minister, Jim Prentice, lead one to believe that the government is trying to whitewash what exactly the schools did.
The most he will say is that the residential schools involved a difficult time in our history, but - and this is the real killer - "the underlying objective had been to provide aboriginal children with an education". Which means that Jim Prentice is either a professional liar or an ignorant fool who doesn't even read history books.
But then again the Conservative Party already knows that Native Canadians aren't going to vote for them, and neither are people who are sympathetic to their plight. They're playing to their constituents, the people who believe that Native people are welfare drunks who lost the war and are lucky we give them anything.
To say that Native leaders are appalled is to put it mildly. To go from a government which recognised the damage caused by the Residential School System, to one that wants to gloss over the nasty bits of our history and make out that the policy had its heart in the right place, is worse than insulting, and it's obscene. I would like to ask Jim Prentice a question, seeing how he thinks this policy was so benign.
How would he like his children taken away from him and made to change the names he had given them, learn a language that prevented him from talking to them, and be told that all he believed was a lie and evil? Wouldn't he want someone to apologise to him for treating his children like that?
The effects of the Residential Schools are still being felt on reserves today as the children of the people who attended them are now a second generation of lost people. They live out in the middle of nowhere with no running water or electricity much of the time, and with little or no connection to their nation's past, or any connection to the land.
While many countries face a difficult battle these days in trying to preserve their cultural identities in the face of an onslaught of homogenisation, the First Nation people of Canada are dealing with trying to teach two generations of people what was stolen from them by government policy. It's just too bad that our current government doesn't view cultural genocide as something you should apologise for.
- Canadian Politics: No Apology For Residential Schools
- Published: March 28, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Culture: History, Culture: Society, Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: Policy
- Part of a feature: Canadian Politics in Review
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
how can they drink water from a bucket when all the waters have been polluted? the earth is not what it once was... which is really sad!
Good article. Thanks.
I agree with the second comment.
They wouldn't need water systems and government money for food if corporations hadn't been allowed by governments to pollute their water, clearcut the forests, etc.
They would not be living in poverty if they were paid properly for the resources stolen from their land either, and for the land that was also stolen.
One comment re the article - it was not "a" lost generation, it was 6-7 generations of residential school horror. And what is not talked about ... The government's own data indicated that 50% of the students died in the schools.
The deaths are not talked about.
Here is a first sample of a video being made about the Mohawk Institute residential school in Brantford, ON where Six Nations kids went.


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 






Well-written post. And I generally agree with you. One point, however.
You say: "They live out in the middle of nowhere with no running water or electricity much of the time"
That's true. But that would also be true if they had been completely "left alone" to their own devices.
I mean, you can't have it both ways. You cannot decry the intervention of the Canadian government in the lives of indigenous peoples, while at the same time tacitly demanding that they interfere by providing modern infrastructure like electricity and chlorinated water and sewers. Either the indigenous people live their lives as "noble savages" or they live their lives as regular Canadians. They should pick one, and then live with it. If they choose the former, then the run the risk of freezing to death in the Winter, or drinking water from a bucket, or dying of a preventable disease. If they choose the latter, then they run the risk of becoming partially-assimilated into Western culture.
The choice is theirs...