Blogcritics Comments on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Comment by Scott Butki on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Fri, 11 May 2007 16:57:55 EDT

I wonder if Michael Moore's latest stunt will breath more interest to this good movie.

Comment by Penny Little on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:10:27 EDT

I set out to make this movie to illustrate how the agencies and individuals within the Government lied to the people of New York, denied the ongoing toxicity of the atmosphere, and how their false reassurances have caused tens of thousands of people to get sick, and some to die. This movie is not about about how the buildings failed, and related anomalies regarding their collapses. That is an entirely different subject, and demands an entire movie devoted to it, with new interviews, and impeccable research. However, if the government has lied to us about what was in the air, could they have lied to us about anything else? There was testing and analysis done by Thomas Cahill which show the anomalous size of the particles, amongst other data. I found out about his studies *after* I had completed filming. Smaller particles are more toxic because they lodge deep in the lungs, in the body, and are not expelled. This was mentioned in my film by Marjorie Clarke. I am not aware of any studies which show exactly how the particles have affected people at the cellular level, or how their health will be affected in the future by these toxic particles which remain in their bodies. This is a study which I believe needs to happen, and this study may include the information about particle sizes, thus raising those questions. If anyone knows of any such studies, please respond. Again, the focus of my movie is about people, especially the fact that people are being poisoned, and that the government knew and has not yet, even to this day, helped most of them. I will not speculate about "exotic" weapons, firstly because I believe it doesn't serve the people who need help; secondly, because I have no evidence; and thirdly, because it's not on topic for *this* particular film.

Comment by Scott Butki on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Mon, 2 Apr 2007 09:29:05 EDT

So you are saying the dust contents prove some kind of 9/11 conspiracy?

Comment by Physics Professor on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Sat, 31 Mar 2007 17:15:48 EDT

What a crying shame that people are still focusing on the "toxicity" of the dust instead of its most remarkable and revealing quality: the distribution of particle sizes. The abundance of nanoparticles within the dust reveals that the dust could not have resulted from the use of (conventional/chemical) "explosives" any more than it could have resulted from any kind of "collapse". Only some kind of exotic weaponry could have caused such widespread devastation on a (near-)molecular level.

Comment by arnold korotkin on Interview With Penny Little, Director of 911: Dust and Deceit at the World Trade Center

Wed, 28 Mar 2007 11:02:46 EDT

Since September 2001 I have maintained a free and confidential "9/11 list-serv". The "9/11 list-serv" distributes daily e-mails containing newspaper articles and other relevant information re: 9/11 issues of interest to 9/11 families, 9/11 organizations and interested individuals. The 9/11 List-serv archives can be accessed. If you would like to 'subscribe' to this free service - resond on the url above.