The Outrageous Antics of Misinformed Environmental Wonks
Published March 26, 2007
While I am not up to date with the way a person living in the 19th century in New York City would experience day-to-day existence, I am extremely familiar with the way a person living in a “large town” in the Wild West in the latter part of said century would live. Trust me, it is far different from the outrageous reality manufactured and being lived by environmentalist Colin Beavan, who claims to be a writer of historical non-fiction. Beavan and his significant other, Michelle Conlin, are living their own version of Walden Pond according to a recent New York Times profile of the couple. Surprise, there's a book involved, the premise of which is to live a 19th century no-impact life for one year.
Part of their theory of 19th century life is to consume only products produced within a 250-mile radius of Manhattan, just like the folks in Manhattan supposedly did over a century ago. The problem is there is no actual historical reality to the way the couple is living. Beavan, author of a book about D-Day and one on forensics, is a fish out of water when it comes to the 19th century lifestyle, unless he is trying to live like someone in 19th century B.C.
First the couple, with their obvious income, would not be living where they are, but in a row house. Secondly, their two-year-old child would probably already be potty-trained and not wearing environmentally correct diapers; she would be in cloth diapers. Unless her parents were tenement dwellers, they would have gas lights, a gas stove, running water, and perhaps even electric lights. Their baby would be properly dressed and not reeking of dirty diaper odor. They would have a nanny for her. Because her daddy was a writer, her mommy would not be working outside the house and would have a rather prominent social position. Finally, because New York City was such a metropolitan area, they would have had access to international products.
“Since November, Mr. Beavan and Isabella have been hewing closely, most particularly in a dietary way, to a 19th-century life.” What did people in 19th century Manhattan eat? Considering the fact that New York City was cosmopolitan with a seaport, the average person who wasn’t living an impoverished and rather deprived life, as exemplified by Mr. Beavan, would probably eat much better than those of us living in Lincoln County, New Mexico today.
The couple has given up coffee. Everyone had access to coffee, no matter who or where. Even the most impoverished homesteader living an existence that Beavan seems to be embracing would have coffee, basic spices like cinnamon, paprika, nutmeg, chili, dill, oregano, basil, pepper, salt, and perhaps even a few more exotic spices from India since they were all the rage. Because Indian spices were all the rage, and mentioned in all the leading magazines of the era, everyone would try using them.
- The Outrageous Antics of Misinformed Environmental Wonks
- Published: March 26, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Society, Culture: Media, Culture: Home and Garden, Culture: History, Sci/Tech: Energy/Environment
- Writer: SJ Reidhead
- SJ Reidhead's BC Writer page
- SJ Reidhead's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Let's be honest: any movement, whether it be pro-life or environmentalism, is significantly about marketing. You need to make other people aware of your cause, and motivate them to join it.
In making your case, metaphors are useful. No Impact Man there is one such great, easy-to-understand metaphor. Does he get some of the details wrong? Of course. Will he make errors along the way? Definitely. Is it a great story that the media loves? Obviously, or you wouldn't be writing about it.
The same, ironically, goes for Gore--it's a blessing and curse. He's been using symbols and metaphors for years to rally people to his cause. Now his lifestyle has become a useful metaphor for his critics.
We find a similar, though reversed, phenomenon in the recent controversy surround Reverend Ted Haggard.
Nobody's perfect, regardless of their political stripes. Everybody's fallible. I think Colin, Al and Ted would all agree to that, and would never claim otherwise.
It's unwise, then, to expect any of our public heroes, whether they be pastors or Presidents, to be perfect.
Since World War II, North Americans invested much of their newfound wealth into suburbia. Suburban development promised a sense of space, affordable living, abundant prosperity and upward mobility. As the population of suburban sprawl has exploded over the past 50 years, so too the suburban way of life became embedded in the American consciousness.
Suburbia, and all its promises of a better life, became the definitive American dream.
But as we enter the 21st century, serious questions have emerged about the sustainability of this way of life. With brutal honesty and a touch of irony, The End of Suburbia explores the American Way of Life and its future prospects as the planet approaches a critical era, and as global demand for fossil fuels begins to outstrip supply. World Oil Peak and the inevitable depletion of fossil fuels are clear signs of how the dream is over and the end is coming.
The silly stuff described in this article highlights the stupid behavior of people with half-baked ideas of how to reform the world.
But the unsustainability of the western "lifestyle" is real. It is less a matter of using fossil fuels than of misusing them to the detriment of our own health. it is my firm opinion that if we do what is best for nature, we will find that it is best for us as well.
Making changes are not easy. In fact they are very hard - and expensive. But we have the choice between the "cheap" and "convenient" hell we've created for ourselves now and the less convenient world of normality we can attempt to attain.
Wait until these two try a 19th century dentist.










"Despite protestations that this lifestyle is to be modelled on the land husbandry methods of the Menominee tribe of Wisconsin ("we will, like the Menominee, figure out what our world can productively offer us rather than considering only what we want"), Mr. Bevan's initiative seems in one respect to be a little half-asscetic. If he were truly committed, should he not move his family to the woods - perhaps to the plot left vacant by Mr. Kaczynski - and resume his efforts there?
"The problem with this, of course, is that an apartment in "an elegant prewar on Lower Fifth Avenue" is as hard to come by as a Menominee in the Bronx - and there's no way they're giving up theirs! Besides, it's not really a lifestyle change per se - it's just a career move ("he needed a new book project and the No Impact year was the only one of four possibilities his agent thought would sell").
"And yet ..."
Read the rest