European Union To Reduce Greenhouse Gases By Twenty Percent
Published March 11, 2007
The 27-nation European Union has just announced an historic new agreement aimed at cutting greenhouse gases and emissions. The accord announced at the weekend is in addition to their previous commitment to abide by the terms of the Kyoto Accord - and goes far beyond Kyoto and anything else that countries like the United States are doing. Or not doing.
Under the terms of the agreement, the Union agreed to ensure that over the next 13 years that greenhouse gas emissions would be cut by 20%; 10% of all automobiles driven in the member states would be fuelled by biofuels made from plants; and that a total of 20% of all energy used by the member nations will be generated through renewable sources compared to the current 6%. These stipulations will apply to all 27 nations in the mighty European Union - the world's No. 1 economic power encompassing nearly 500 million people.
Some aspects in the accord have given environmentalists pause. First is the fact that the French and some of the newer Eastern European member states like Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic have insisted that nuclear energy be listed as a viable alternative to fossil fuels.
Some of these countries are landlocked and are at northern latitudes, which reduces the viability of solar and wind power acting as a substitute for coal as the driving engine of industry. While nuclear fuel might burn cleaner, the problem remains of what to do with disposal of the spent fuel rods. Would using nuclear fuel just be a matter of exchanging a short-term problem for a long-term one?
Then there is the fact that not all countries in the Union are going to comply within the time period allowed. Once again it’s the former Soviet Bloc countries that are facing difficulties. Having only joined the Union in 2004 some of them have not yet benefited completely from their membership and would face real economic difficulties in meeting the goals established by the agreement.
In order to accommodate these countries, the language of the agreement is vague about the commitment of individual countries, only stipulating that over all the Union meet these targets. So while some countries might fall short, as long as others make up the difference they will be able to claim success.
What the leaders of the European countries are hoping for, aside from preserving the earth a little longer, is that by showing a commitment to lowering greenhouse gases above and beyond that agreed to under the Kyoto Accord, they will encourage some of the other major polluters to at least sign off on Kyoto. Four of the largest polluters and consumers of fossil fuels in the world - the United States, Russia, India and China - are doing nothing to in the fight against global warming.
- European Union To Reduce Greenhouse Gases By Twenty Percent
- Published: March 11, 2007
- Type: News
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Politics: Policy, Politics: Energy and Environment, Culture: Society, Culture: Business and Economics, Sci/Tech: Energy/Environment
- Writer: Richard Marcus
- Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
- Richard Marcus's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
- RSS Feeds
- All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Richard Marcus
Politics: Policy
Politics: Energy and Environment
Culture: Society
Culture: Business and Economics
Sci/Tech: Energy/Environment
All Politics Articles
Richard Marcus's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments
Comments
Facts about the Kyoto Protocol:
Under the treaty, the European Union committed to reducing its emissions 8 percent below 1990 levels; Japan and Canada committed to a 6 percent cut; and Russia, whose entry provided the quorum needed to put the treaty into effect, committed to limit emissions right at 1990 levels. The United States would have had to limit emissions at 7 percent below 1990 levels. Source: Washington Post
Probably Kyoto will be superceded by a new kind of arrangement. At its summit on Friday, the EU said it would decrease emissions by 30% instead of 20% if the United States and other major polluters agreed to follow suit.
The US has already committed to 20% by 2017 if I recall correctly.
And Kyoto will have to be superceded, because right now it's basically dead as everyone is non-compliant.
Dave
The US committed to 18% by 2012 in 2002.
GLOBAL WARMING IS BULLSHIT. ONLY A PETA TYPE LIBERAL FOOL WOULD FALL FOR THIS CRAP. WHAT FUCKING FOOLS.
Fart less and dont eat so much beans.


Richard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at 








You miss a very important aspect of this issue, Richard.
The fact is that most of the European nations are failing in their efforts to meet Kyoto standards. In many cases they are increasing emissions enormously rather than reducing them - increasing them by more than the US has been.
In fact, the only countries which have made any progress on the Kyoto objectives are those which have switched a lot of their energy production over the nuclear power.
What you also miss in this article is that the proposed reductions in this EU agreement are substantially LESS than what they agreed to in Kyoto, NOT in addition to Kyoto. It also seems manifestly impossible for eastern european countries which are posting growing yearly double digit increases in carbon output to suddenly go negative because of this agreement.
All of which adds up to the fact that Kyoto is dead, dead, dead and this agreement is pure pie in the sky.
And BTW, your own lovely North American Kyoto signee isn't going to meet their Kyoto obligations either.
Oh, and one more thing, the objectives in this agreement are virtually identical to the goals President Bush has set for here in the US.
Dave