DVD Review: Borat
Published March 09, 2007
Funny, depressing, and consistently offensive, Borat is soon to be a classic comedy. It’s a film that has no boundaries and little care for political correctness. In today’s climate, that’s exactly what movie audiences need.
For a comedy, there’s definitely a sharp eye for some of America’s downfalls. A gun dealer has no problem letting Borat handle a gun after explicitly asking if it’s good to kill Jews. A rodeo owner discusses how all gays should be hung. An entire crowd of eager onlookers cheers as Borat praises “America’s war OF terror.” These depressing looks at American society strangely fit in with Borat’s antics, giving the audience a few minutes to breathe before more hilarity ensues.
Nearly every segment works as Sacha Baron Cohen’s character travels the country in search of Pamela Anderson, all while filming a “documentary” about America for his impossible to spell country, Kazakhstan. He meets all kinds of Americans: those who threaten him, those who enjoy his company, and a few who arrest him.
Borat earns its hard R rating in ways that are barely appropriate for publication. Don’t let the thought of a naked fat man sitting on the face of a naked skinny man scare you off. It’s the best scene in the movie, despite the rather torturous lingering memories when the film is over.
The film is brilliant as clueless people have no idea they’re being duped, and Cohen is well aware that his actions are outrageously offensive. Everyone gets their moment, whether they're religious, a politician, gay, mentally handicapped, or an average American. With some of the reactions, it’s hard to say any of these people didn’t have it coming.
Borat is one of those rare comedies that can inflict actual pain on the viewer. There’s little time to breathe or calm down. You’re constantly laughing to the point of physical exhaustion. Aside from a slight calming down period in the final half hour, Borat is perfect. ![]()
- DVD Review: Borat
- Published: March 09, 2007
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Comedy, Video: Documentary
- Writer: Matt Paprocki
- Matt Paprocki's BC Writer page
- Matt Paprocki's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
It's not intentional. It depends entirely on where they were shooting. Obviously, large camera equipment won't fit inside a subway, so a small cam was used for those scenes. If it was intentional, than the scenes filmed in his "home country" would look like this too.
Simply put, all of my DVD reviews of video and audio are for the mid-range home theater crowd. Regardless of the reasons, it's constantly varying in quality, and there are other minor issues as well.








One point that should be made... the video and audio quality is purposely bad at some parts of the movie. It's supposed to look like it is of lower quality and low budget.
That's part of the charm.
So, while the video and audio quality would seem lacking at parts based on the standards of today's Hi-Def standard for movies and television... I think that in the case of this movie, the video and audio quality actually deserves four or even five stars since the parts where it is lacking are done so to purposely ad to the effect and feel that the movie is going for.