OPINION

What Makes a Hero?

Written by Daniel Woolstencroft
Published February 28, 2007

Heroes episode 17 - "Company Man" - is the finest 45 minutes of television I've ever seen.

It's been an astonishing series so far; I can't recall any other show that's made me howl in disbelief as another cliffhanger presents itself. Almost every episode ends with the viewer desperate to see next week's installment. To achieve that level of captivation, and sustain it for 17 episodes, is unequalled.

24 attempts it, but the increasingly ludicrous adventures of Jack Bauer are attractive more because we want to be surprised by the next set of twists and turns rather than a ferocious need to see what happens to our favourite characters next week. Buffy achieved it from time to time, but couldn't sustain it, and didn't achieve it in its first season.

As an audience, we're used to the flashback technique — we've seen it all before. But in this episode, as we're treated to visions of the past, more pieces of the Heroes puzzle - a puzzle that's plagued us for so long now - fall into place, and yet we're left with more questions. Just as some doors are closed, other doors are opened. This is one of Heroes' greatest strengths.

Over the course of the last 16 episodes, the titular heroes have transitioned from hero to villain; at times mysterious, then tantalizingly revealed, before being plunged back into mystery again. We never quite know who's who: preconceptions formed in the first few hours of the show are revealed to be way off the mark. And yet, just when you think you've figured things out, the rug's pulled from under you again and you're lost — desperate for that next episode so you can see where things end up.

From the very first show, Heroes has been magnificently written, directed, and acted. It's not just about the Heroes we see on-screen, but the heroes involved in the production of such a brilliantly realised show. Tim Kring, series creator, is as much a hero to his audience as the characters he puts on screen. The inclusion of Stan Lee in a previous episode tips the hat to what must be one of Kring's own heroes — not to mention an idol of a good percentage of the show's fans.

The directors, script writers, special effects team, and the actors - most notably Hayden Panettiere, Jack Coleman, and Masi Oka, but across the board - are heroes in their own right, doing an incredible job week on week. Ali Larter seems to come under fire quite often for her portrayal of dual roles Niki and Jessica, but in this writer's opinion she's doing a fine job; given the amount of time she's had on screen over the course of the series so far, if she was as bad as certain people have suggested, she'd have been killed off long ago.

And that's the other thing about Heroes: you just don't know who might die. The show is bigger than any one of its characters. Everybody will have their own personal favourite: they may go for the geek - loving Hiro's comic book references, they might enjoy the teen angst of indestructible cheerleader Claire, maybe sexy psycho Niki floats your boat, or maybe Peter's combination of awesome power and dark, handsome looks do it for you; there's something for everyone. The show isn't called Peter Petrelli, or Hiro Nakamura - it's called Heroes. Every single one of these characters is fair game, but vitally important to everything that's going on.

page 1 | 2
Daniel Woolstencroft is the brains behind Is There Food? - containing topics as diverse as zombies, Apple, technology, film, and other assorted strangeness.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
What Makes a Hero?
Published: February 28, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: SF, Video: Television
Writer: Daniel Woolstencroft
Daniel Woolstencroft's BC Writer page
Daniel Woolstencroft's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Daniel Woolstencroft
Video: SF
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Daniel Woolstencroft's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 28, 2007 @ 22:45PM — Lisa McKay [URL]

Congratulations! This article has been selected for syndication to Advance.net, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States.

#2 — March 1, 2007 @ 16:18PM — Ty

"Ali Larter seems to come under fire quite often for her portrayal of dual roles Niki and Jessica, but in this writer's opinion she's doing a fine job; given the amount of time she's had on screen over the course of the series so far, if she was as bad as certain people have suggested, she'd have been killed off long ago."

I think Ali Larter is doing a good job. The problem is, WE HATE THE NIKKI/JESSICA STORYLINE. It flat out sucks. Ditto that for her son and her husband. I am glad the last two weeks have shown no signs of any of these people: Nikki/Jessica was not written well, and that is really what brings this subplot down.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/60351)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments