OPINION

Ray Wong's Annual Oscar Predictions

Written by Ray Wong
Published February 22, 2007

As a movie critic, I see a lot of films every year. As a movie buff, I enjoy movies. As a writer, I appreciate a good script. As an actor, I understand good performances. And as a consumer, I believe in solid entertainment that also enlightens, enthralls, and educates.

I've seen most of the nominated films and performances this year. I have to admit, I don't think 2006 was a stellar year for films. I am, however, impressed by the number of independent as well as mainstream films that deal with interesting characters and stories and dare to take some risks. The problem is, the general public might not be on the same page. Audiences prefer mainstream, high profile productions — big names, big stars, big budgets. With four of the five best picture nominees being independent films, Oscar might lose its luster once again this year (except for Ellen Degeneres — she's going to bring some fun to the show, I'm sure).

Best Picture

  • Little Miss Sunshine
  • Babel
  • Letters from Iwo Jima
  • The Departed
  • The Queen

Letters is critically acclaimed but without the box office traction; and it's in Japanese with subtitles. Sunshine has a lot going for it — humor, dysfunctional family, crowd-pleasing plot and characters, and stellar performances — but it may simply be too lightweight; besides, comedies seldom win. The Queen is wonderful, but perhaps a bit too intimate, and many voters might be satisfied with giving Helen Mirren an award. That leaves Babel — this year's Crash — and The Departed. Both are violent and disturbing but also very entertaining. Personally, I am disappointed with The Departed, but Babel is not necessarily a crowd-pleaser either.

Will win: Babel
Should win: Letters from Iwo Jima

Best Director

  • Clint Eastwood (Letters from Iwo Jima)
  • Martin Scorsese (The Departed)
  • Stephen Frears (The Queen)
  • Alejandro González Iñárritu (Babel)
  • Paul Greengrass (Flight 93)

Eastwood already won twice in the last five years — enough said. The Queen is a showcase for its acting talent; Frears should be honored just to be nominated. Greengrass is the dark horse — his handling of the 9/11 film garnered much respect. Iñárritu is a long shot, but a Babel vote may push him over the top as well. Scorsese has been passed over so many times it's become a joke. And Hollywood may want to right some wrongs this year.

Will win: Martin Scorsese
Should win: Martin Scorsese

Best Actor

  • Will Smith
  • Ryan Gosling
  • Leonardo DiCaprio
  • Forest Whitaker
  • Peter O'Toole

Smith's performance is good, but only good for a nomination, not a win. Gosling's star is definitely rising, but this is not his year, with such strong competition. DiCarprio should have been nominated for The Departed instead. Peter O'Toole is a marvel, and may get enough sentimental votes to win. Forest Whitaker's tour de force performance makes him a front-runner, but many believe his was a supporting role.

Will win: Forest Whitaker
Should win: Peter O'Toole

Best Actress

  • Meryl Streep
  • Helen Mirren
  • Penélope Cruz
  • Judi Dench
  • Kate Winslet

Meryl Streep is delicious in Prada but it's difficult to win for a comedy, especially with such strong dramatic competition. Cruz's powerful performance is too intimate, plus it's a foreign film. Judi Dench has a juicy role, but I find it too stereotypical and predictable. Kate Winslet is a great actress and her time will come, just not this year. Why? Because Helen Mirren is in the running. There's absolutely nothing negative about Mirren's performance. It was a revelation. Besides, it's about time the wonderful actress gets her crown.

page 1 | 2
Ray Wong is the author the novel, The Pacific Between, which won a 2006 IPPY Book Award. He also writes movie reviews for Actors Ink and Talk Entertainment. Other credits include the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Writers Post Journal, the Deepening. As a professional actor, Ray has worked with Julianne Moore, Peter Falk, Sarah Jessica Parker and Rob Marshall in features as well as TV productions.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Ray Wong's Annual Oscar Predictions
Published: February 22, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Awards Shows, Video: Film and TV Business
Writer: Ray Wong
Ray Wong's BC Writer page
Ray Wong's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Ray Wong
Video: Awards Shows
Video: Film and TV Business
All Video Articles
Ray Wong's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 22, 2007 @ 11:45AM — moonraven

Much as I would like to see more Oscars gathered in by Mexican filmmakers (I have lived in Mexico for about 15 years now), I feel the hype this year has been, more than usual, built on sand.

I saw El laberinto del fauno (Pan's Labyrinth) last weekend and it was not necessary for me to draw on all those years I worked as a film critic in the States to give it a big NO.

I am interested in the context--post-Civil War persecution of the "losing" Republicans. I saw an excellent documentary a couple years ago at the Quito Documentary Film Festival that featured interviews with survivors, visits to the areas where they had camped out in the mountains, and so forth.

The script for Pan's Labyrinth, unfortunately, presented two hours of one-dimensional characters--especially on the Falangist side. Zero credibility of the supposedly real characters made his specially effected ones superfluous.

I have not been so disappointed in a film in several years.

On the other hand, when I saw "Volver" last May in France, I was very pleasantly surprised. Complex relationships and characters. Black humor that was almost an update of Hitchcock's charming "The Trouble with Harry"--and from a director who irritated me mightily in the past with hysterical posturing and drag queen antics.

If you haven't seen "Volver", give it a shot. And skip by Pan by at least 100 yards.

#2 — February 22, 2007 @ 14:23PM — Ty

"Meryl Streep is delicious in Prada but it's difficult to win for a comedy, especially with such strong dramatic competition"

The biggest reason Streep has no chance is because hers is a SUPPORTING ROLE in the Devil Wears Prada. She should not be up for Best Actress, but rather Best Supporting Actress.

Anne Hathaway is the lead actress in The Devil Wears Prada.

I too also feel Whitaker's role in The Last King of Scotland is a supporting role, but the argument there is a bit fuzzier than Prada.

#3 — February 22, 2007 @ 16:25PM — Ray

I agree that Anne Hathaway was the lead in Prada, but Streep's role is also pivotal -- without her role, there would be no story at all. So I don't have a problem with her being considered as the lead actress. Obviously, there can be more than one lead in any film (for example, both Helen Mirren and Michael Sheen were leads in The Queen). Same with Forest Whitaker. Sometimes, I guess, we can't really determine who is a lead simply by screen time.

#4 — February 22, 2007 @ 16:31PM — Krutic [URL]

I can't believe Jack Nicholson wasn't nominated.

#5 — May 6, 2007 @ 04:16AM — Kevin Lee

Moonraven, to each his own.

My views:

Pan's Labyrinth is a beautiful and inspiring film. Without doubt one of the best films I've ever seen. It is worthy of its awards.

Yes, it may be simple, but in it's simplicity lies a complexity that you obviously didn't see.

Also, before you go see a movie, watch an interview from it's creator, that way, with your deficient wisdow, you may grab an inkling as to what the bigger picture is about.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/60017)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments