OPINION

Anarchy in Somalia

Written by Liam Bailey
Published February 22, 2007

Late last year Ethiopian forces invaded Somalia, and with Somalia's Transitional Government (TG) forces drove the Union of Islamic Courts (UIC) out of Mogadishu - and with the help of American air strikes, supposedly out of Somalia. Somali residents had lived in a state of anarchy since the dictator Siad Barre was ousted in 1991. The Union of Islamic Courts restored order and allowed people to go about their normal lives in relative security.

In UI-controlled areas children could go to school safely, and once more hospitals could treat the sick without flows of injured, struck down by daily violence. However, the UIC ruled with a strict code of Sharia law, meaning the security came at the cost of some personal freedoms and civil liberties. With the UIC ousted, 2007 has seen a new chapter of violence and insecurity in Somalia.

The UIC began their sweep to power, taking the capital of Mogadishu last June. By December they controlled most of Southern and Central Somalia. The Transitional Government's one remaining stronghold was Baidoa and a small area surrounding it, where it is widely believed Ethiopian troops were stationed to protect the government.

The United Nations was responsible for the imposition of the TG. In early December they still recognized it as the only governing body in Somalia or "the only route to peace and stability" - as it was called in Resolution 1725 - despite it being made up of warlords. They were responsible for much of the violence, insecurity and terrorization of the civilian population before the UIC took power.

The U.S. provided strong support against the UIC forces: Strong support to the very warlords who, by inflicting heavy casualties, forced the withdrawal of U.S. forces in a peacekeeping mission in the early 90s. U.S. support failed to stop the UIC advance. Shortly before the Ethiopian invasion the U.S. presented a draft resolution to the UN Security Council (UNSC). The Resolution laid out the rules of engagement for a proposed Inter-Governmental Authority on Development and African Union force to enter Somalia. The force was to protect the TG, to restart the peace negotiations between the TG and the UIC, but ultimately to reinstall the UN-recognized government and engage any forces running contrary to that mission.

It was adopted as Resolution 1725, but the UIC's rapid sweep to power gave the impression that they were a strong, determined and highly capable fighting force. This combined with the UIC's war declaration on Ethiopian forces in Somalia, their threats to attack peacekeepers and the Iraq quagmire, which started from a similar mission-  all this rendered IGAD countries reluctant to send their forces into what could easily become another Iraq.  

No Worthy Intentions

Ethiopia showed no such reluctance, because Ethiopia had no such noble intentions.
With U.S. support, Ethiopia responded to the UIC's final attack on the last remaining government stronghold of Baidoa. Ethiopia said throughout that it had no intention of occupying Somalia: its only mission was to oust the UIC and return the TG to the seat of power. Unexpectedly, the UIC put up little resistance, displaying none of the fight to the death attitude they had spoken of. Ethiopian and TG forces made short work of removing the strict regime of the UIC. As they beat a hasty retreat, the UIC made statements to the media, promising to wage a guerrilla war, "like Iraq".

page 1 | 2
**Liam Bailey is a U.K. freelance journalist. He has just set up two new websites The Bailey Mail and Poetry Occasions, on top of his blogs: War Pages, Peace Poetry and Politics U.K.. You can contact him by e-mail.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Anarchy in Somalia
Published: February 22, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Writer: Liam Bailey
Liam Bailey's BC Writer page
Liam Bailey's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Liam Bailey
All Politics Articles
Liam Bailey's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — February 25, 2007 @ 00:52AM — Ruvy in Jerusalem

Liam,

The next time you pontificate on how lovely Hamas is and how evil we are for not obeying UN resolutions, I'll remind you of this article...

Seems you are noticing how you do not like the UN.

#2 — February 25, 2007 @ 07:42AM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Just in the spirit of tit for tat you like so much, Ruvy, I'll add that the UN, like both your government and your faith, are human constructs and as such are liable to make mistakes. Fortunately, it's not irrevocably tied to theory and dogma and can learn from its mistakes...

#3 — December 18, 2007 @ 20:19PM — Alvaro

So "security is more important than freedom" Yeah, sure. Go tell it to the ex-commies in the GDR, Poland and other assorted dictatorships in South America and Asia.

These people are not free. They are at the mercy of others.

Liam: I think that phrase has been proven _so_ wrong so many times now, that you should know better than uttering it.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/60016)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments