NEWS

Maine Shows the Way on Real ID

Written by Dave Nalle
Published January 28, 2007

One of the most controversial elements of the war on terror has been the attempt to use it as a justification for establishing a nationwide ID card system called Real ID. Unable to get enough votes to establish a federally issued ID with biometric information, during the height of PATRIOT Act frenzy Congress passed the Real ID Act instead, which was designed to standardize state drivers licenses and require them to include additional biometric information and be accessible through a nationwide database.

Supporters of the act argued that it was an important way to control terrorism by ensuring that citizens could be definitively identified and making it harder for foreigners to enter the country illegally and blend into society. To make this work you would be required to show your ID for any financial transaction, making it theoretically possible to track the activities of every citizen in addition to identifying non-citizens.

Opponents have objected that such an ID is the equivalent of the 'internal passport' used by oppressive regimes like Soviet Russia and Communist China, where police can stop you at any time, ask for your ID and easily monitor the activities of troublesome citizens. It's a system which essentially treats the entire population as if they were criminal suspects and with the addition of modern data technology it becomes a potential massive invasion of privacy. Complaints have also been raised that it's a massive unfunded mandate, putting all the expense for a national ID system originating with the federal government on the backs of the states.

On Thursday the Maine State Legislature showed us why the federalist concept of dividing powers between the state and federal governments was such a great idea when they passed a bill opposing the Real ID Act by an overwhelming majority of 34 to 0 in the state Senate and 137 to 4 in the state House. The act states unequivocally that "the Maine Legislature refuses to implement the Real ID Act of 2005." Copies were sent to Michael Chertoff of the Department of Homeland Security, President Bush and other officials. The act is a non-binding resolution, but an act is already being framed to take concrete action and prohibit the Maine Secretary of State from complying with or supporting the Real ID Act when it goes into effect in 2008.

page 1 | 2
Dave Nalle has been a magazine editor, freelance writer, capitol hill staffer, game designer and taught college history for many years. He is Vice Chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus, working to promote liberty in the GOP. He designs fonts for a living and lives with his family just outside Austin. You can find his writings on politics and culture at Republic of Dave, on conspiracy theories at IdiotWars and on design and fonts at The Scriptorium.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Maine Shows the Way on Real ID
Published: January 28, 2007
Type: News
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: Local and Regional, Politics: U.S., Politics: War and Terrorism
Writer: Dave Nalle
Dave Nalle's BC Writer page
Dave Nalle's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Dave Nalle
Politics: Law and Rights
Politics: Local and Regional
Politics: U.S.
Politics: War and Terrorism
All Politics Articles
Dave Nalle's personal weblog
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 28, 2007 @ 20:54PM — Lumpy [URL]

I hear new hampshire is set to vote on their equivalent bill on monday or tuesday. I wonder how many states will follow suit. I can't see big atates like pennsylvania or virginia doing it.

#2 — January 28, 2007 @ 21:13PM — Clavos

Nice to see a state's legislators take real bipartisan action in resisting Washington on an issue as important to our individual freedom as this is.

Ehyup...

#3 — January 28, 2007 @ 23:36PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

BTW, I'm dedicating this article to D'Oh for all the obvious reasons.

Dave

#4 — January 29, 2007 @ 10:20AM — Nancy

Good for the down-Mainers. At this point, anything that Bush/Cheney propose is suspect, considering their cavalier attitude towards civil & constitutional rights.

As usual, good article, Dave. Very enjoyable to read & very informative.

#5 — January 29, 2007 @ 12:12PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Real ID came from Congress and the Department of Homeland Security more than from Bush/Cheney, and it was supported by a majority of both parties at the time. We'll see if that attitude will change as the states begin to be heard in opposition to it.

Dave

#6 — January 29, 2007 @ 13:49PM — moonraven

I think this is the only piece I have seen from Dave that is not openly manipulative and verging on psychosis. Apparently his meds are working.

The only thing is, Dave has shown his real self on this site by extensively searching out info on posters and invading their privacy. I was a target for that behavior and for his subsequent paranoid speculations.

What's going on here?

#7 — January 29, 2007 @ 14:21PM — Nancy

How - where - & when did Dave search for your information & then post it? Unless he's put it in very deep code, I haven't seen any reference to you in this article...?

#8 — January 29, 2007 @ 14:38PM — moonraven

Nancy, It was several months ago. On one of the threads about Chavez, I think. He and his malignant tumor, clavos, were into searching and invading privacy--and they posted my complete name, other info not germane to thread and went into a paranoid dance of how I worked for, take your pick: Venezuela, China, Bolivia, quien sabe quien mas....

#9 — January 29, 2007 @ 14:42PM — Nancy

Oh. Well, personally I don't remember it, altho I take your word for it, but - not to offend - it didn't seem germaine to the argument so I blipped over it & I'll bet everyone else did too, so you probably shouldn't worry. What I remember most about you personally is that you've been to Saudi Arabia, from which you have fascinating stories, & are currently in Mexico where you also know a man who plows with a mule :) At least YOUR life is colorful & interesting; if they posted mine, you'd all be catatonic, probably.

#10 — January 29, 2007 @ 14:53PM — moonraven

Yes, my life IS colorful and interesting.

It didn't happen that way by accident. I decided at 49 that I was not going to turn 50 in the US, that from then on I was going to do what I wanted and where I wanted to do it. I bought a 1965 VW Beetle and headed south.

#11 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:03PM — Nancy

I gotta admire that; it takes 'gumption' & 'moxie' - two of my grandparent's favorite old-timey words I still use. I've gotten to the point that while I love hearing/reading about adventures like yours & people like you, I find myself considering "may you live in interesting times" to be a curse instead of a blessing. Also I never seem to have time & funds simultaneously to allow me to travel seriously. But good for you: rock on!

#12 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:08PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Unless my memory is playing tricks on me, moonraven, you were originally commenting using your own full name and then switched to your current identity without saying anything to anybody. It seems a little excessive to be harshing on people for figuring that out.

Pedanticboy

#13 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:11PM — moonraven

I plan to do just that. Thanks.

#14 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:14PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

My god you're delusional, Moonraver. YOU posted your personal info. We just remembered it.

In fact, you posted over 100 comments under your real name, starting with comment #30 on this thread.

And you wonder why we call you crazy.

Dave

#15 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:22PM — moonraven

I NEVER posted my complete name. I posted one first name and one last name. And I certainly did not talk about antiwar poems which had nothing to do with the thread.

You assholes posted my complete name and other personal info such as my age--which was taken from the Poets against the War site.

You are, as usual, a fucking liar.

#16 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:22PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Dave, please indulge me and try for a little more charm. Just because you think moonraven is delusional, you don't actually have to say it and thus open the door to another endless round of retaliatory strikes. There's enough of that going on in the world already!

I'm not saying you're wrong by the way; see my reply to her at #12, publication of which was temporarily delayed by Akismet, which has belatedly decided that I might be a spammer, just that there's enough drivel to debate as it is!

#17 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:28PM — moonraven

Chris,

What you wrote was definitely spam. See my double post above.

#18 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:35PM — Christopher Rose [URL]

Really? I fail to see how that was spam. For clarity's sake I removed your dupe, just in case you're wondering.

#19 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:39PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

I NEVER posted my complete name. I posted one first name and one last name. And I certainly did not talk about antiwar poems which had nothing to do with the thread.

I don't know of anyone referring to you by any more than your first and last names. I certainly have no idea what other names you have.

And anyone with access to google can find your antiwar poems with your first and last names. If you didn't want people to do that you should not have posted them on the internet.

You assholes posted my complete name and other personal info such as my age--which was taken from the Poets against the War site.

I have no idea what your age is, or at least I didn't until you posted information about when you graduated from college, which gave me a rough idea. If someone posted it then it wasn't me. And again, if you didn't want your age known, why did you post it on a public internet site?

You can't blame people for finding out stuff about you which you yourself made public.

Truthfully, we're not THAT interested in your personal details.

Dave

#20 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:40PM — moonraven

It was spam because it was not true.

I posted under the name Marthe Raymond. That's ONE first name and ONE last name.

Clavos and Dave then did an internet search and posted my first name, my middle name and both of the last names--plus additional personal info such as age that they took from the site I mentioned in my post above.

I suggest you take your clarity and shove it.

#21 — January 29, 2007 @ 15:41PM — moonraven

Right, Dave: That's why you made up the paranoid pap about my working for the Chinese, Venezuelan and Bolivian governments.

#22 — January 30, 2007 @ 00:36AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

MR, could you post a link to where I exposed all this vital personal information, because I sure don't remember doing it. I don't even know what those other names are and I only have a guess at your age. Maybe Clavos dug up that info, I'm sure it's all from things you posted on other sites. Again, it's not private information if you posted it yourself on a public website.

I will admit to identifying your Chines IP address while you were in Bahrain. And why would you object to being accused of working for Bolivia or Venezuela. Their leaders are your heroes. Working for them would be an honor, right?

Dave

#23 — January 30, 2007 @ 00:46AM — Clavos

I think it was actually Franco; but he was finding info by Googling, so it WAS publicly posted on the web.

And nobody would ever have found anything if she hadn't (as you and I both pointed out, Dave) posted dozens of comments with her real name.

#24 — January 30, 2007 @ 11:27AM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Articles on Google news suggest that New Mexico and New Hampshire will both join Maine in challenging Real ID this week.

#25 — January 30, 2007 @ 12:57PM — moonraven

No matter how you try to paint it, Dave, it's clearly hypocritical to write an article like this when you are obviously VERY big on violating other folks' privacy.

#26 — January 30, 2007 @ 13:01PM — Nasty Little Man [URL]

Dave said:
"it was supported by a majority of both parties at the time."

Technically true, but here's the real scoop. Real ID was tacked on to a funding bill for tsunami victims and troops overseas. Had it been considered on its own merits, Real ID never would have made it through. Liberals and (true) conservatives would have howled.

NLM

#27 — January 30, 2007 @ 13:02PM — troll

I dunno raver - I kinda liked your revolutionary poetry

#28 — January 30, 2007 @ 13:09PM — Nancy

So what is its status (the bill, not MR's ID) now?

I have to admit being divided on this. On the one hand, we sorely need some sort of national ID to separate the sheep from the goats, as it were, & help stop illegals & those with criminal records; on the other, history plainly warns of the danger such a system would present, especially in the hands of corrupt government or power-hungry/delusional miscreants like BushCo. At some point one danger will outweigh the other, but I am not omniscient enough to know when, and I don't trust BushCo to take out the trash, so I certainly wouldn't trust them to know, either, especially considering Dubya & Dick's cavalier handling of the constitution et al.

#29 — January 30, 2007 @ 13:52PM — moonraven

Troll,

That's beside the point. If I had wanted the poetry on the Poets against the War site to be accessed from THIS site I would have put a link to it.

I organized a Poets against the War event at UMar here in Mexico when I was a department head there. The crowd was standing room only in the auditorium and we had original posters, music, and presentors of poems in both Spanish and English. It was a great event, BUT it had nothing to do with what I was posting on THIS site.

#30 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:13PM — troll

when I recognize an original voice I get interested...so I checked you out and found a link to your poetry through common dreams...please explain in what way this is inappropriate

I'm sure that your friends in the Bush administration have gone much farther

(when you re-read you last #29 don't you sound like a control freak to yourself - ?)

I guess you're just regretting using your actual name from the get go - but then I would have missed the poems

#31 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:28PM — moonraven

That you bothered to check out my poems is not a concern for me.

You did not POST all my personal info on this site like the Gang of Three did. That was an invasion of my privacy.

Yes, the CIA has gone much further (trying to "interview" me in Caracas, disabling my email in Caracas, photographing me in the street in Caracas, bugging my hotel room in Quito, etc.)

I expect that kind of invasive behavior from them.

#32 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:35PM — troll

actually I think that I did post a link to the poems early on which might have inspired the quest...sorry 'bout that

#33 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:50PM — Nancy

The CIA...? Whatever for? Did you say something negative to that fool Dubya in Spanish or something?

#34 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:55PM — moonraven

I would not deign to say anything to the Cross-eyed Cretin.

The CIA started following me around when I was invited to an event in Caracas in 2003 (one of the panel topics was Agrarian Reform, and I am a specialist in that area).

#35 — January 30, 2007 @ 14:58PM — Nancy

...?! Why the hell would they object to anybody attending an event about agriculture?! Now that's bizarre, even for the CIA - & I used to work with a few of them; they are some straaaaaaange folks.

#36 — January 30, 2007 @ 15:01PM — Martin Lav

They must have heard she was sowing seeds and had ears and got confused....

#37 — January 30, 2007 @ 15:02PM — moonraven

It was not an event about agriculture.

It was a solidarity event to commemorate the first anniversary of Chavez' return to power after Venezuela's being made a dictatorship for 47 hours. Agrarian reform is one of the projects of the Venezuelan government--and was one of maybe a dozen topics in panels.

#38 — January 30, 2007 @ 15:11PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

I'd say that pretty much covers why the CIA was interested in the event.

Dave

#39 — January 30, 2007 @ 15:19PM — Nancy

Oh. Ok.

#40 — January 30, 2007 @ 16:18PM — moonraven

One of the CIA clowns that approached me tried to pass himself off as a reporter for The Nation, until he looked completely blank when I mentioned some US funding that had been exposed by The Nation.

I had to tell him that he needed to get a whole lot better at presenting his cover--and I sent him away.

#41 — January 30, 2007 @ 16:33PM — Martin Lav

Moonraver,

Let me know if you and Dave fall in love when you finally meet under the bed, him looking for socialists, you looking for CIA......

Now that would make for some interesting dialog finally!

#42 — January 30, 2007 @ 16:39PM — moonraven

I don't have to LOOK for them under the bed.

I found one of their electronic gismos under my bed in Quito, and quickly changed hotels.

#43 — January 30, 2007 @ 16:54PM — S.T.M

"I had to tell him that he needed to get a whole lot better at presenting his cover"

I bet he looked even blanker, then ...

#44 — January 30, 2007 @ 16:59PM — moonraven

No. He turned red, though.

#45 — January 30, 2007 @ 17:01PM — Martin Lav

"electronic gismos under my bed"

What size batteries?

#46 — January 30, 2007 @ 17:04PM — moonraven

Idiot.

#47 — January 30, 2007 @ 18:02PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

No. He turned red, though.

Trying not to laugh, I imagine. Poor reporter.

Dave

#48 — January 30, 2007 @ 18:52PM — Emry

If he really wanted to bust a gut he'd visit your website, Dave.

#49 — January 31, 2007 @ 00:40AM — Clavos

Yeah, right.

Like the CIA is going to waste their time on an aging hippie gringa who lives in a jacal with a campesino family...

#50 — January 31, 2007 @ 11:31AM — Emry

Not when they could be visiting a worn-out redneck on his tub.

#51 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:30PM — moonraven

They sure do like to waste their time with ageing hippie gringas when they are in Caracas by invitation of the Venezuelan government. You bet your ass they do, Dave.

Sorry that you are of interest to no one.

#52 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:37PM — D'oh [URL]

But moonraven, folks ARE interested.

Recently, some Amish saw Dave's picture on the bottom of his columns and asked if he could get Yul Brenner, Steve McQueen, Robert Vaughn, Charles Bronson, James Coburn, and Harry Dexter to come and defend their village from bandits.

True story....

heh

#53 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:38PM — moonraven

Well, I guess that puts Dave in the company of other dead people.

Pretty sharp, those Amish.

#54 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:40PM — troll

magnificent - !

#55 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:42PM — moonraven

Seven stars, even....

#56 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:44PM — Dave Nalle

Of the characters in The Magnificent Seven the picture unquestionably looks most like the Robert Vaughn character.

#57 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:44PM — D'oh [URL]

As always, troll gets it.

Have a cookie!

--------------------------> @

and some coffee!

----------------------------> c|_|

#58 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:46PM — Nancy

Ahhh...you didn't say you were there per personal invitation of the Authorities. No wonder the NSA was tagging you. Most likely them, not the CIA. Are you flattered or offended? In a sense, it's flattering, I guess ....

BTW, a non-sequitur, but the CIA covert ops branch is actually ADVERTISING on RADIO for recruits-! That's the first time I've ever heard that! They really must be hard up for personnel!

#59 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:50PM — Clavos

Ahhh...you didn't say you were there per personal invitation of the Authorities.

Oh, come on, Nancy, you're not usually so gullible...

#60 — January 31, 2007 @ 12:52PM — moonraven

No, Nancy, Caracas is ALWAYS crawling with CIA. Like lice, they are.

Someone forgot about Eli Wallach--but Dave doesn't APPEAR to be Jewish....Who knows. Dead is dead.

#61 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:16PM — D'oh [URL]

Eli was the bandit, not one of the "seven samurai".

Important to keep your sub-references straight in my line of endeavor.

Since Dave dedicated this one to me, I have a bit of food for thought to give him.

For Dave, the Tao of D'oh.

#62 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:24PM — moonraven

D'oh: I didn't mean to suggest that Eli was one of the magnificent.

(I don't know what your line of endeavor is, but I worked for a number of years as a film critic in the States.)

I definitely see Dave as a bandit. Just not Jewish.

#63 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:25PM — Emry

"Eli was the bandit, not one of the "seven samurai"."

And he didn't need no stinkin' badgers....

My mistake, that was from The Wildlife of the Sierra Madre.

#64 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:28PM — Nancy

Never did see the movie; was there just one bandit? They needed seven guys to protect them from one bandit? Must'a been some bandit.

#65 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:29PM — D'oh [URL]

My line of endeavor?

heh...esotericist, perhaps?

But I digress...

As for "real IDs", I stick with Heinlein.

When a society decays to the point where internal passports are required, and identification is mandatory...it's time to invest in canned goods and shotguns if you can't get the hell out of there.

I know, I paraphrased.

#66 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:33PM — moonraven

In terms of physical appearance--although Dave's pic leaves a lot to be desired--in all truth he probably most resembles Horst Buchholz....

#67 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:33PM — troll

I take a break from digging my bomb shelter to find this - good grief - !

#68 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:35PM — D'oh [URL]

At least you had a cookie and coffee waiting for you when you returned.

yer welcome

#69 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:37PM — Nancy

ROTFLOL, Troll - that wuz the best laugh I've had all week!

#70 — January 31, 2007 @ 13:40PM — moonraven

Unfortunately, digging your bomb shelter probably put you cheek to cheek with Dave....

#71 — August 16, 2007 @ 10:04AM — Walter W.

I can't believe that we're so close to Bush being known openly as "Little Hitler"

He's doing this whole terrorism thing to us to to scare us into control. And once he has it, watch out! Oil, baby!

#72 — August 16, 2007 @ 12:06PM — Nancy

He's already known as "Little Hitler" to a lot of us. Where've YOU been hiding all these past 6 years?

#73 — August 16, 2007 @ 12:39PM — Dave Nalle [URL]

Nothing like playing down the evil of Hitler through such an invidious comparison. If you want to look for the people who are taking away your rights, read this article and then look at Capitol Hill.

Dave

#74 — August 16, 2007 @ 14:42PM — Nancy

BushCo takes away the rights, & the spineless maggots on the Hill kowtow & tug their forelocks & pass it. Just like Hitler & the German government in '37-9.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/58844)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments