Do Muslims have Greater Rights in Australia?
Published January 24, 2007
Sahi Bukhari, Volume 9, Book 85, Number 77: Narrated Abu Huraira:
"While we were in the mosque, Allah's Apostle (Muhammad) came out to us and said, "Let us proceed to the Jews." So we went along with him till we reached Bait-al-Midras (a place where the Torah used to be recited and all the Jews of the town used to gather). The Prophet stood up and addressed them, "O Assembly of Jews! Embrace Islam and you will be safe!" The Jews replied, "O Muhammad! You have conveyed Allah's message to us." The Prophet said, "That is what I want (from you)." He repeated his first statement for the second time, and they said, "You have conveyed Allah's message, O Muhammad." Then he said it for the third time and added, "You should know that the earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle, and I want to exile you from this land, so whoever among you owns some property, can sell it, otherwise you should know that the Earth belongs to Allah and His Apostle."" (See Hadith No. 392, Vol. 4).
This hadith refers to the incidence of the Prophet’s exiling the Jewish community of Banu Nadir in 626 CE. Soon after this warning, the prophet accused the Jewish community of plotting to kill him and attacked them. After defeating them, he exiled them and captured their assets and weapons. It should be mentioned here that the Prophet had attacked the Jewish clan of Banu Qainuqa in early 624, about 18 months after his arrival in Medina. After capturing the Jewish community, the Prophet wanted to slaughter them en masse. But under intense opposition from Abdullah Ibn Obayi, an influential local leader and a Muslim convert, the Prophet was forced to decide in favor of exiling them to Syria within three days. The last Jewish community of Banu Qurayza was attacked in 628 CE under a flimsy and unsubstantiated excuse of breaking an existing treaty. Their 700-900 grown-up males were slaughtered en masse and women and children were taken slaves and later sold to Nedj for weapons and horses.
What we must consider here is that the Prophet, like the Muslim immigrants of the West, had arrived in Medina with his Muslim converts as refugees and the land of Medina immediately became the property of him and his God, the Allah. The indigenous Jews of Medina, who had let the Prophet settle down in their locality just a few years earlier, must now convert to Islam to be able to live in their own land, which now arbitrarily had changed ownership to the prophet and his God. Else, they must leave. If not, they would be aggressively attacked and preferably slaughtered en masse for the refusal to submit to Islam. Under unfavorable circumstances, however, the Prophet would be satisfied by expelling them to foreign lands. All actions of the Prophet had direct sanction from Allah. Here is how the lord of the universe sanctioned the butchery of the Banu Qurayza in the Koran:
- Do Muslims have Greater Rights in Australia?
- Published: January 24, 2007
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Culture
- Filed Under: Culture: Religion, Culture: History, Politics: International
- Writer: Muhammad Hussain
- Muhammad Hussain's BC Writer page
- Muhammad Hussain's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
One reason muslims have almost zero credibility with non-muslims is due to stupid, bigoted, & incredibly arrogant attitudes like "...muslims have greater rights than non-muslims over every corner of the earth."
And then they wonder why no one else likes them or respects them....?
Alamgir wrote: "Under such distress and to avoid persecution, the prophet sought refuge in Medina, which was quickly granted by the Medina citizens. They also assured the safety and security of his community and so he migrated there with converts in 622 CE from Mecca. His religion was getting converts fast in Medina, which had hinted towards a greater chance of success to his otherwise doomed prophetic mission in Medina. This likely "greener pasture" in Medina was also a big reason for the prophet's migration to Medina."
Yeah, there's a modern version of this .... thousands of Muslims who were suffering in their own country through the strife of civil war found refuge in Australia, through kindness.
The government of Malcolm Fraser in one of the few good things it did in the late 1970s opened the door to thousands of Muslim Lebanese, who were considered genuine refugees - and if you were around at the time and knew and saw what was going on in Lebanon you'd know that to be true.
Subsequent Australian governments have continued to open the door to Muslim refugees from all overv the world.
You can imagine, then, that those Australians descended from convicts and who built this country might feel a little miffed when they realise that their kindness has been repaid by the kind of nonsense spewed out by the mufti and some of his apologists.
Luckily, he doesn't speak for all Muslims in Australia. Getting 5000 worshippers at the Lakemba mosque in south-western Sydney after the gang-rape/uncovered meat comments is not a wholesale show of strength. There are a lot more than 5000 muslims in south-western Sydney. As many are avid followers of their local team in the National Rugby League, You'd probably get twice that number at a single Bulldogs game at Homebush Stadium on a Friday or Saturday night.
And Hilaly is wrong about paying for tickets. The vast majority of Muslim Australians either came from Lebanon or were born here. They are either the original refugees, who were given generous government support, or the children of those refugees. Many others are family members of the originals, and were able to come to Australia under generous family reunion schemes - also supported by the government.
It makes my blood boil when I, as a person who was angered by the rioters who attacked innocent people of middle-eastern descent in 2005, then have to listen to this kind of nonsense.
In their misguided racism, sadly it was inspired by the kinds of rubbish the mufti is fond of spouting.
This is a secular country, but largely a Christian country, and therefore has different values which Muslims must respect as much as we must respect theirs. Remember that it was the generosity and kindness of a Christian country - yes, a country settled by convicts, if you must - that gave many Muslims refuge and the opportunity for a new life away from dreadful war and strife that tore their country apart.
Perhaps rather than writing this nonsense, you could come up with some constructive solutions - otherwise we'll all be banging our heads against brickwalls for the next 100 years.
But my answer is no, Muslims don't have a greater right to be in Australia. Since this country is a country of migrants, they have as much right to be here as anyone.
But some of them also need to understand that with that rights comes responsibilities and obligations. One of the main obligations is to seek to end divisions, rather than create them.
And I'll ask this question: are Muslim Australians Australians or Muslims?
Also, having noted your last few paragraphs about Taqqiya, which I am well versed upon having lived in the middle east, I am now wondering - is your story a call to arms by the west against those you describe as the Taqqiya tacticians??
Under that theory, even you could be one such tactician, Alamgir ....
If any-one believes that muslims have come to any of our anglo-saxon based countries "for a better life"and freedom , they must be stark staring bonkers!They have but one agenda,domination,either through violence or demographic displacement of the anglo-saxon and his culture,as seen from the article above,they will be paragons of virtue while thier numbers are small,but as they increase so will thier violence and demands,they are not here to share ,they are using our democracies against us,and unless we stand up to them and insist upon the supremacy of our cultures and our rule of law,and basic freedoms then we and our children are finnished.
STM, I am here to tell the plain truth. If I take recourse of deception and lies to divert attention, then only you can call me a 'Taqiyya tactician'.





Once again we have a muslim intellectual defending the indefensible...
Hilaly may be well-educated in Islamic lore, but he's an elderly Egyption who has not managed to learn to speak English despite living in Australia for 20+ years.
Most people in Australia regard him as a joke - he clearly does not respect me on the other 19.7 million Australians who are not muslim, so why should we respect him?
If a non-muslim makes comments that offends muslim sensibilities, all hell breaks loose, yet the muslim community doesn't feel it necessary to exercise the same restraint they expect of others. So much for mutual respect.....