OPINION

Do Muslims have Greater Rights in Australia?

Written by Muhammad Hussain
Published January 24, 2007
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Prophet Muhammad, with his fledgling community of about 100 converts in Mecca, had become stagnant in his profession of preaching the religion of Islam. In Mecca, his 12-year-long mission was not heading anywhere. His religion was stubbornly rejected by Mecca citizens. The Prophet's preaching contained insults to the indigenous religion, culture and to their ancestors and caused social dissensions and family disputes. Hence, the exasperated citizens of Mecca also punished the Prophet by social exclusion of his community for two years (617-619 CE). His community, formed of the lowest-ranked people of the city, including a few slaves, was facing financial hardships because of the sanctions and social exclusion they had faced from the annoyed yet influential members of the city.

Under such distress and to avoid persecution, the prophet sought refuge in Medina, which was quickly granted by the Medina citizens. They also assured the safety and security of his community and so he migrated there with converts in 622 CE from Mecca. His religion was getting converts fast in Medina, which had hinted towards a greater chance of success to his otherwise doomed prophetic mission in Medina. This likely "greener pasture" in Medina was also a big reason for the prophet’s migration to Medina.

Similarly, many Muslims of today are threatened or persecuted by their countrymen and governments for their incitement of hatred and violence or criminal acts. Such Muslims often seek asylum in the Western countries and like the Medina citizens, the Western governments quickly give refuge to such people. Consequently, many deadly criminals of the Muslim world have found refuge in cities like London and Toronto. However, the biggest reason Muslims desperately seek to migrate to the West is the greener pastures, which the Kafir (infidel) Western nations offer to then. Muslim countries are terribly corrupt and desperately poor with little hope for the citizens to make a comfortable life. So, most Muslims seek to migrate to the West at any cost. And they normally take recourse of the most corrupts, immoral and deceptive means to arrive in the West for a definite greener pasture which those countries offer.

Thus, there is a perfect similarity in circumstances between Prophet Muhammad’s migration to Medina in 622 CE and Muslims’ immigration to the West in recent decades. In other words, Muslims’ migration to the West perfectly emulates the deeds and actions of the Prophet, which is a requirement in Islam.

Now, we must examine, the activities of the Prophet in Medina and determine if Muslims’ actions in the West conforms to those of the Prophet, which will make them live the most perfect life according to the Islam. I will examine this in relation to Mufti Hilali’s apparently outrageous comment about Muslims’ possessing greater rights than the white Australians.

Let us see what the Prophet of Islam had to say about the rights of his community in Medina:

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Alamgir Hussain (PhD) is a co-author in 'Beyond Jihad - Critical Voices from Inside' (Academica Press). He has completed writing a new book entitled, 'History of Islam -- Separating Myths from Reality'.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Do Muslims have Greater Rights in Australia?
Published: January 24, 2007
Type: Opinion
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Culture: Religion, Culture: History, Politics: International
Writer: Muhammad Hussain
Muhammad Hussain's BC Writer page
Muhammad Hussain's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Muhammad Hussain
Culture: Religion
Culture: History
Politics: International
All Culture Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 24, 2007 @ 20:08PM — malfunction99

Once again we have a muslim intellectual defending the indefensible...

Hilaly may be well-educated in Islamic lore, but he's an elderly Egyption who has not managed to learn to speak English despite living in Australia for 20+ years.

Most people in Australia regard him as a joke - he clearly does not respect me on the other 19.7 million Australians who are not muslim, so why should we respect him?

If a non-muslim makes comments that offends muslim sensibilities, all hell breaks loose, yet the muslim community doesn't feel it necessary to exercise the same restraint they expect of others. So much for mutual respect.....

#2 — January 24, 2007 @ 20:21PM — Nancy

One reason muslims have almost zero credibility with non-muslims is due to stupid, bigoted, & incredibly arrogant attitudes like "...muslims have greater rights than non-muslims over every corner of the earth."

And then they wonder why no one else likes them or respects them....?

#3 — January 24, 2007 @ 21:02PM — STM

Alamgir wrote: "Under such distress and to avoid persecution, the prophet sought refuge in Medina, which was quickly granted by the Medina citizens. They also assured the safety and security of his community and so he migrated there with converts in 622 CE from Mecca. His religion was getting converts fast in Medina, which had hinted towards a greater chance of success to his otherwise doomed prophetic mission in Medina. This likely "greener pasture" in Medina was also a big reason for the prophet's migration to Medina."

Yeah, there's a modern version of this .... thousands of Muslims who were suffering in their own country through the strife of civil war found refuge in Australia, through kindness.

The government of Malcolm Fraser in one of the few good things it did in the late 1970s opened the door to thousands of Muslim Lebanese, who were considered genuine refugees - and if you were around at the time and knew and saw what was going on in Lebanon you'd know that to be true.

Subsequent Australian governments have continued to open the door to Muslim refugees from all overv the world.

You can imagine, then, that those Australians descended from convicts and who built this country might feel a little miffed when they realise that their kindness has been repaid by the kind of nonsense spewed out by the mufti and some of his apologists.

Luckily, he doesn't speak for all Muslims in Australia. Getting 5000 worshippers at the Lakemba mosque in south-western Sydney after the gang-rape/uncovered meat comments is not a wholesale show of strength. There are a lot more than 5000 muslims in south-western Sydney. As many are avid followers of their local team in the National Rugby League, You'd probably get twice that number at a single Bulldogs game at Homebush Stadium on a Friday or Saturday night.

And Hilaly is wrong about paying for tickets. The vast majority of Muslim Australians either came from Lebanon or were born here. They are either the original refugees, who were given generous government support, or the children of those refugees. Many others are family members of the originals, and were able to come to Australia under generous family reunion schemes - also supported by the government.

It makes my blood boil when I, as a person who was angered by the rioters who attacked innocent people of middle-eastern descent in 2005, then have to listen to this kind of nonsense.

In their misguided racism, sadly it was inspired by the kinds of rubbish the mufti is fond of spouting.

This is a secular country, but largely a Christian country, and therefore has different values which Muslims must respect as much as we must respect theirs. Remember that it was the generosity and kindness of a Christian country - yes, a country settled by convicts, if you must - that gave many Muslims refuge and the opportunity for a new life away from dreadful war and strife that tore their country apart.

Perhaps rather than writing this nonsense, you could come up with some constructive solutions - otherwise we'll all be banging our heads against brickwalls for the next 100 years.

But my answer is no, Muslims don't have a greater right to be in Australia. Since this country is a country of migrants, they have as much right to be here as anyone.

But some of them also need to understand that with that rights comes responsibilities and obligations. One of the main obligations is to seek to end divisions, rather than create them.

And I'll ask this question: are Muslim Australians Australians or Muslims?

#4 — January 24, 2007 @ 21:23PM — STM

Also, having noted your last few paragraphs about Taqqiya, which I am well versed upon having lived in the middle east, I am now wondering - is your story a call to arms by the west against those you describe as the Taqqiya tacticians??

Under that theory, even you could be one such tactician, Alamgir ....

#5 — January 25, 2007 @ 07:57AM — R CROSS

If any-one believes that muslims have come to any of our anglo-saxon based countries "for a better life"and freedom , they must be stark staring bonkers!They have but one agenda,domination,either through violence or demographic displacement of the anglo-saxon and his culture,as seen from the article above,they will be paragons of virtue while thier numbers are small,but as they increase so will thier violence and demands,they are not here to share ,they are using our democracies against us,and unless we stand up to them and insist upon the supremacy of our cultures and our rule of law,and basic freedoms then we and our children are finnished.

#6 — January 25, 2007 @ 09:38AM — Alamgir Hussain

STM, I am here to tell the plain truth. If I take recourse of deception and lies to divert attention, then only you can call me a 'Taqiyya tactician'.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/58641)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments