Netscape Represents the Future of News
Published January 16, 2007
The jury is certainly still out on whether or not the "new" Netscape.com — revamped into what some would herald as an innovative experiment in social news and others would deride as yet another Digg-clone wannabe — is a success or not.
But it doesn't matter in the long run. I like to think of the Netscape model as a hybrid approach to social news, as it builds upon the "Digg model" of user submitted stories + everyone votes for their favorite stories = a user controlled front page of your "online newspaper." Netscape has a strong social news base (in terms of how they feature and emphasize this form of people power) and also employs Netscape Navigators, human editors who submit their own stories, make some stories "sticky" by featuring them in an admin-controlled area on the front page, and commenting, friending, and generally taking an active social networking-style role on the site that is diametrically opposed to Digg's human-hands-off-way-off style.
Scott Karp at Publishing 2.0 asks if news is a fundamentally shared, social experience. I would argue that it is... to a certain extent. Scott is right in saying that people enjoy sites like Digg and Techmeme because they offer the prospect of interesting stories that you didn't even know you would be interested in (Reddit is my favorite site that falls into this category, by the way). This activity is akin to the traditional experience of browsing through part or the full of the newspaper over breakfast, isn't it? In both cases the consumer is browsing a trusted news source. Of course, one is selected by professional journalists while the other is selected by the audience, or some combination of editors and users.
I believe that there is a great potential audience for a hybrid social news approach that Netscape spearheaded, and much sooner rather than later many sites — mainstream media and "web 2.0" social news sites both — will adopt a model roughly along the following lines.
The future of news sites will comprise three kinds of content, which will be mixed and matched and meshed together in all kinds of dizzying ways:
* User submitted content - This is the backbone of any social news site, and I expect that its popularity will only increase. User-controlled sites are, in the end, all about the community that springs up around the news/voting platform so I suspect that niche social news sites - based upon specific subject areas, interests, geography, or beliefs - will thrive over the next few years.
- Netscape Represents the Future of News
- Published: January 16, 2007
- Type: News
- Section: Sci/Tech
- Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Internet
- Part of a feature: Online Media Cultist
- Writer: Eric Berlin
- Eric Berlin's BC Writer page
- Eric Berlin's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
And here I thought Blogcritics was the future of news.
Len, if you don't like social news, I'm afraid you won't like (digg?) the new Netscape!
Matt, Blogcritics is the forever of news, reviews, opinions, and interviews (smiles).
So much of what I see on the Netscape home page is opinion and political commentary based on assertions of fact that in no way can ever be substantiated. I regard that as trash much like "news." My trash-worthy opinion of trash-worthy opinions.
Some people over on Netscape seem to feel the same way, Ken. However, the perceived poltical bias or ideology of the content is a mostly separate piece from the online social news platform that Netscape developed, which is and will be the platform, I would argue, for a new wave of online news sites.


Eric Berlin is the Executive Producer of 

The new Netscape sucks! Bring back the old Netscape! I prefer isp.netscape.com.