REVIEW

Movie Review: Pulse

Written by Mat Brewster
Published January 10, 2007

Why?

Dear god why did I waste 90 minutes of my precious life on this film? Why did the filmmakers waste so much of their time making it?

The story of how I came to watch Pulse yesterday afternoon is an interesting one. When it came out on DVD a few weeks ago I thought it sounded interesting. Or rather, when I learned that it was a remake of a Japanese horror film, I became interested in that.

I immediately went to Blockbuster.com and added the film to my queue. Well, I added the Japanese version, the American remake, plus another film named Pulse because I couldn’t quite figure out which version was the remake. Blockbuster’s website is amazingly slow, at least on my computer, and at the time it wasn’t worth the effort to try to figure out which was the proper one.

I put on the Japanese one first, figuring that if it was any good I’d determine which version was the remake and watch it. Of course, this being Blockbuster, their screwy queue system never works properly and I generally get my picks out of order. So, even though the Japanese import was number one in the queue, an American film titled Pulse, which was several movies down in the queue came first (and I should note the film’s above it are all listed as “available.”)

Putting the film in I assumed it was the American remake, but later found out later that it was in fact a British film titled Octane. Why the American one is renamed it Pulse is beyond me. Is Pulse a better title than Octane? Do American’s not understand what "octane" means? The fact that it was changed means there was some board meeting discussing this very thing. Insanity reigns.

Anyway, the film was mostly lousy, but contained a few interesting moments and was highlighted by a pretty good performance by Madeline Stowe. Then I soon discovered other movies that looked interesting, and put them all way before the correct versions of Pulse in my queue, and promptly forgot about my desire to see the films anyway.

Two days ago a friend and I went to see a movie (Night at the Museum – much funnier than I expected it to be for those of you keeping count) and afterwards he invited me over for some pizza. I had a Blockbuster return in my car so I decided to swing by there first. The only great thing about Blockbuster’s online rental program is that you can now return their mail-in movies to the local store where they will not only tell the computer to send another movie out, but will let you exchange it for an in-store movie.

Being that my friend was expecting me, I quickly skimmed the new release aisle for something I hadn’t seen. Hmmm, what’s this? A new horror flick called Pulse? Sure, that sounds good. Now as insulting as it sounds, I really didn’t remember all the stuff that had happened previously in the above paragraphs and had no idea what Pulse was.

page 1 | 2
Mat Brewster is an American stumbling as an ex-pat through the streets of Shanghai. He is helped by his lovely wife and an enormous piles of bootleg DVDs. He is chronicling his adventures in the Shanghai Diaries and musing on pop culture at The Midnight Cafe.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Pulse
Published: January 10, 2007
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Horror
Writer: Mat Brewster
Mat Brewster's BC Writer page
Mat Brewster's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mat Brewster
Video: Horror
All Video Articles
Mat Brewster's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — January 11, 2007 @ 15:23PM — Duke De Mondo [URL]

By God, sir Brewster, you ahd me chortlin like a man possessed. I never did see the remake, but the original is a fine slab of cinema, one which is riddled with no end of plot holes and illogical turns, but which is nonetheless so overwhelmingly eerie and ... distant, that they seem of no consequence, the aforementioned failings. if'n it was Hollywoodised, i dare say those flaws would be ever so jarring. Still, it has a wonderful poster, if no-where near as good as the Asian "fella pulling some sort of black thing off of his deranged head" number, which i see has been criminally cropped in the DVD release up yonder.

#2 — January 11, 2007 @ 17:04PM — Iloz Zoc [URL]

I know what "octane" means!

The Japanese version is better. Also, my take on it was that it wasn't the dead returning per se, but some creepy bizarro things from "outside."

Anyway, you are right. So many important things like good scripting, plot logic, sustained suspense are missing in this film, you could use it as a perfect example of what not to do when making a horror film (or a film). I sat through this and wasted a perfectly good Friday night. I was so disappointed I didn't have the energy to write a review. Hey, wait a minute...maybe my energy was zapped by those creepy bizarro things from outside.

#3 — January 11, 2007 @ 17:21PM — Mat Brewster [URL]

Thanks fellas.

Duke the original is still in my queue and I keep hearing it is good, so I'll try not to let the stinking remake keep me from seeing it.

Iloz, I'm glad you know what the word is, could you maybe tell those guys in Hollywood this so they'll stop arbitrarily changing names of the films?!?

Interesting take on what those things were. I'd debate it with you, but really, it's not worth either of our time.

The concept is so good that it really rather pisses me off that the ruined it so.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/58012)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments