REVIEW

Movie Review: Stranger Than Fiction - No Defense

Written by Alan Dale
Published December 30, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Clearly, the movie makers chose Ana's tax protest as something that would appeal to their intended audience. They did not, however, think through the issue. A cafeteria style of tax protest would not improve the income tax in any of the most important respects. For example, it would wildly increase the inequity of the tax burden among taxpayers, because everybody could in effect choose his own marginal rate. (Some people would become tax protestors solely in order to lower their tax bills, of course, and wealthy individuals and big corporations would want in on it, too.)

It would also make tax returns even more complex to fill out (more schedules, more tables), and it would make the tax law less transparent because the government would inevitably fail to draft clear standards for distinguishing acceptable and unacceptable protest. Finally, it would increase the cost of administering the income tax due to the additional time auditors would spend determining whether any protest were sincere and whether the taxpayer had used the correct percentage allocable to the item she didn't want to pay for. And that cost, remember, would be borne by all of us through the collection of taxes.

Nor does it help that Ana's protest centers on the national defense budget. Not untypically, I'm afraid, she enjoys the rights and prosperity protected by our military strength but doesn't have sense enough to be grateful. And have the movie makers considered that if we were able to pick and choose among categories of taxes, there would be a certain, perhaps substantial, number who would gladly pay for tanks and not swing-sets, or do they think that tax protest is acceptable only for people who agree with them? I felt like I was being talked down to by children, and I wanted to answer back that democracy, like playing with other kids, does not mean you always get your own way.

More important to the story is the fact that Ana bakes an assortment of cookies especially for Harold, who "can't" take them because of the policy forbidding an auditor to accept gifts. (The policy is reasonable, but Ana takes it personally and is offended.) In this scene he also reveals that his mother never baked cookies for him. Thus, the banality lies not in the usual battle between numbers and words, which is always, always, always won by words — in movies put out by some of the most saber-toothed number-crunchers in the world. (Even Helm will have sent his agent to negotiate as high a price as possible before letting his script be filmed.) Rather, it lies in a numbers-versus-cookies contest, and cookies here stand not just for comfort and emotional connection, but world-friendly values as well. (Does Helm think September 11 could have been avoided if we'd just sent cookies to Osama bin Laden?)

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies of the 1990s and Comedy Is a Man in Trouble: Slapstick in American Movies.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Stranger Than Fiction - No Defense
Published: December 30, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Art House, Video: Comedy, Video: Drama, Video: Fantasy, Video: Romantic Comedies
Writer: Alan Dale
Alan Dale's BC Writer page
Alan Dale's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Alan Dale
Video: Art House
Video: Comedy
Video: Drama
Video: Fantasy
Video: Romantic Comedies
All Video Articles
Alan Dale's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — June 22, 2008 @ 19:36PM — Paul

To quote Thoreau in a movie review is the first sign of over-thinking the film.

To reject its imperfect characters, who only fleetingly espouse such grand philosophies as half-baked is missing the point.

Stranger Than Fiction is smart not because it is academic, high-brow, or philosophical. But because it rejects such concerns in favor of human emotion.

Consider the final conversation between Eiffel and
Hilbert, when he tells her the book is no masterpiece without Harold's death. She responds that because he knows, and accepts it anyway, it is inhuman to allow it to happen. She refuses to sacrifice humanity for art. This movie is a celebration of humanity. It is emotional art that perhaps compromises itself in terms of literary merit, but soars majestically as an example of humanism. The characters are flawed because they must be. If they were better, cleverer, more rational or more well versed in Thoreau's Civil Disobedience, the movie would be a plodding, academic investigation of art and humanity. And that would be worse than not allowing Harold Crick to die.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/57607)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments