http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:32:02 EST http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-503133 Yeah, like the Inuit were going to extract the oil with their kakivak's. No offense. Congrats, Mr. Marcus. Montreal Canadiens - good man. 503133@blogcritics.org Sun, 31 Dec 2006 17:32:02 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-496733 Richard, congratulations Good Sir, and that interview was glorious also. It does the site no end of good to have folks like yourself on here. And what a lovely man, also. 496733@blogcritics.org Mon, 18 Dec 2006 17:17:10 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-496224 I really like how he loves talking about himself! 496224@blogcritics.org Sat, 16 Dec 2006 17:22:39 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-494215 Ah, it's good to see that land owned by the Government in Canada is still called Crown Land (just like in Australia). Much of it wasn't used by indenigenous people in the sense that we understand land ownership anyway. Therein lies the problem. A conundrum now being left to others to sort out, just like in the US, with varying degrees of success. Although mostly not. 494215@blogcritics.org Sun, 10 Dec 2006 23:52:32 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-494123 How nice of Canada to allow Indigenous peoples use of their own land. How of them. Seems racist to me when oil companies can go on Indigenous (Crown? Who wers the crown?) Land. Receive hugh tax breaks and I am sure lax environmental controls. Why can these companies sell or do whatever they want? 494123@blogcritics.org Sun, 10 Dec 2006 18:31:11 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-493726 Lisa and Richard: What an incredible piece. Lisa, you somehow encompassed the essence of Richard in your brief intro, including the formidable depth and scope of his work. And Richard, I felt like you were inside my head (or vice versa) as I was reading the interview--and if I read you right, that's one of the essential elements of what every writer strives for. You've got it in spades. Congrats! 493726@blogcritics.org Sat, 9 Dec 2006 13:20:11 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-493087 Mate, I have often heard Canada described as "America's hat". However, I have a copy of Mercator's correctional map of the world, which since north and south are nothing more than human inventions and no-one really knows what is top and what is bottom, has Australia and New Zealand at the top of the world. The US of course is then below the equator, with Canada below that. Using this map, it is no longer America's hat, but America's undies. I'm sure they prefer being the hat. 493087@blogcritics.org Fri, 8 Dec 2006 01:09:42 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-493080 STM, keep monkeying with US Americans, and we'll execute Terence and Philip again. Canadians are already skating on thin ice as it is. If you read the fine print, the Patriot Act actually outlaws Canada. That whole country is just one Celine Dion album away from being the new Iraq. 493080@blogcritics.org Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:48:48 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-493071 "Look, all decent patriotic Americans naturally hate beady-eyed Canucks." Never got over having your blurters kicked from here to kingdom and back in the War of 1812, eh? Time to bloody well forget that, Al, old boy, and move on. 493071@blogcritics.org Fri, 8 Dec 2006 00:03:59 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-493066 Why, some of my best friends are Canadians... Look, all decent patriotic Americans naturally hate beady-eyed Canucks with their heads so full of lies. Brother Marcus, however, does not indulge in the head full of lies part. He will tend to make somewhat different value judgments than me in some political areas (ie he tends to be more "liberal"), but he's highly respectful of facts and strives to seek truth rather than simply win arguments. So then, as Canadians go, Richard Marcus ain't half bad. He's one of the good ones. 493066@blogcritics.org Thu, 7 Dec 2006 23:43:19 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-492063 The interview was wonderful reading and the collection of articles is inspiring. I especially appreciated your comment, Richard, that what you found most difficult is this:"getting the words on the page to be as exciting as they sound in my head." Really resonated with my experience, and your persistence has paid off, as evidenced in the quality of your work. Congrats! 492063@blogcritics.org Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:12:57 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491833 You write good stuff. Keep 'um coming, Richard. -P 491833@blogcritics.org Wed, 6 Dec 2006 09:37:51 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491819 Richard, Congratulations! Well deserved! 491819@blogcritics.org Wed, 6 Dec 2006 08:44:12 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491754 Holleee do I really sound like that pompus beady canuck... Thank you very much Lisa and all you other editor types for the honour. Considering all the folk who write on this site and have quite amazing things to say all the time it's enough to make a fella's head swell. That is until his next article is put on hold for being sensless gibberish. Oh well that gives me about a day or two to revel in this. Thank you once again, cheers Richard Marcus 491754@blogcritics.org Wed, 6 Dec 2006 01:33:12 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491738 Congratulations. I really enjoyed reading about you, your writing, and your process Keep up the good work. 491738@blogcritics.org Tue, 5 Dec 2006 23:53:30 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491729 Yea, Richard! Great write-up, great interview. 491729@blogcritics.org Tue, 5 Dec 2006 22:38:45 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491682 Uh oh. Back to back Canucks. We really need to plan this better. 491682@blogcritics.org Tue, 5 Dec 2006 19:55:53 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/12/05/163000.php#comment-491626 Congratulations Richard! Thank you for sharing with us via the interview. Nice write-up as usual, Lisa. 491626@blogcritics.org Tue, 5 Dec 2006 16:47:39 EST