INTERVIEW

Blogcritic of the Month, December 2006: Richard Marcus

Written by Lisa McKay
Published December 05, 2006

The purpose of this monthly series is to highlight an outstanding contributor to the site as chosen by the editorial staff. This designation is meant to recognize and celebrate the best of the best, those writers who not only shine by virtue of their talent, but whose ongoing participation gives all of us a reason to tune in each and every day. As new readers are continually discovering Blogcritics, we also hope to introduce these fine writers to a new audience.

Please join me in a virtual round of applause for this month’s honoree, Richard Marcus!

We first encountered him here in June of 2005, a writer who called himself Gypsyman and whose work was remarkable for its breadth, its honesty, and its prolific nature. Some 357 articles later, Gypsyman unmasked himself and we met Richard Marcus, a self-described “long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes, reviews, and opines on the world as he sees it.”

In the past eighteen months, Richard has graced these pages with an impressive 655 articles (as of this writing). To attempt to pigeon-hole him is futile. Is he a music writer? Yes, certainly, and a book reviewer as well. A politics writer? A prolific one, to be sure. An observer of contemporary culture? That sounds like him, too.

In short, Richard’s contributions to BC have spanned the site and are remarkable not only for their breadth, but for the attention to detail that his work evidences. Not content to merely tell you whether a book or a recording is worth your time, Richard will tell you everything you need to know about the artist and the genre in which he or she creates. Haven’t paid too much attention to Canadian politics? You’ll know more than you ever thought possible after you’ve read a few of the articles in his series. While his writing is impossible to categorize, it is always characterized by Richard's passion - for his work and his subject matter - and his personal integrity.

Honesty and unflinching self-examination are also qualities that can be found in Richard’s writings. It’s impossible to have read his work here and not feel as though you know the man, sight unseen. Music Editor Connie Phillips, whose section is a frequent home to Richard’s work, says, “Richard Marcus brings passion to his writing. Whether his topic of choice is politics, his NaNoWriMo attempts, or his reviews for the music section, he writes from his heart and draws his reader in.” And it’s that personal connection that keeps us reading.

BC publisher Eric Olsen sums Richard up perfectly when he says, “No one writes with more of himself than Richard Marcus: his sensitivity, generosity of spirit, insight, and personal honesty are unprecedented. Blogcritics would be a very different and lesser place without him.”

Before we get to the interview, a bit of background on Richard, in his own words:

I was born in a one-room log cabin with an igloo outhouse. Oh, alright… I was born in Ottawa, Canada sometime in the previous century when a Kennedy was President of the United States. My father worked in the Justice Department of the Federal Government and we moved between Toronto and Ottawa twice before I was twelve. He switched to corporate law when I was fifteen and we moved backed to Toronto where I lived until 1990.
I studied theatre in University and worked in theatre as an actor/director/producer and technical director from 1982 until ’92, by which time I'd had enough. I had started writing during my time in theatre and had one script produced, an adaptation of Dalton Trumbo's book Johnny Got His Gun, which I wrote while watching the first Gulf War on CNN. Instead of music I used news items from the broadcast as transitions between scenes.
I moved to Kingston, Ontario in 1990, which is where I currently live with my musician wife and our four cats. I turned my energies towards writing in the early nineties with poetry and the occasional short story. Currently I'm on a provincial government disability pension and write whenever and whatever I can. My first novel, The Paths Life Takes, is sitting in the offices of Penguin India awaiting a decision, and I have self-published two collections of articles that I've culled from my work at Blogcritics: NaNoWriMo Notes - An Exercise in Creative Insanity and Voices of Creation: The Blogcritics Interviews. The former is from the series of the same name at Blogcritics, while the latter consists of the interviews I've conducted over the past year accompanied by reviews of each of the subject’s works.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10
Lisa McKay is BC Magazine's Executive Editor. She can usually be found hanging out in the Film section. In her spare time, she watches movies, writes, makes art, listens to music, reads, and caters to the every whim of two spoiled cats. She is now in the “experience is better than things” stage of her life and almost never passes up the opportunity to go to a good concert.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Blogcritic of the Month, December 2006: Richard Marcus
Published: December 05, 2006
Type: Interview
Section: Culture
Filed Under: Books: The Writing Life, Culture: Administrative, Culture: Arts, Culture: Media, Sci/Tech: Blogging
Part of a feature: Blogcritic of the Month
Writer: Lisa McKay
Lisa McKay's BC Writer page
Lisa McKay's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Lisa McKay
Books: The Writing Life
Culture: Administrative
Culture: Arts
Culture: Media
Sci/Tech: Blogging
All Culture Articles
All Interview articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 5, 2006 @ 16:47PM — Connie Phillips [URL]

Congratulations Richard! Thank you for sharing with us via the interview. Nice write-up as usual, Lisa.

#2 — December 5, 2006 @ 19:55PM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

Uh oh. Back to back Canucks. We really need to plan this better.

#3 — December 5, 2006 @ 22:38PM — SonnyD

Yea, Richard! Great write-up, great interview.

#4 — December 5, 2006 @ 23:53PM — Vikk Simmons [URL]

Congratulations. I really enjoyed reading about you, your writing, and your process Keep up the good work.

#5 — December 6, 2006 @ 01:33AM — Richard Marcus [URL]

Holleee

do I really sound like that pompus beady canuck...

Thank you very much Lisa and all you other editor types for the honour. Considering all the folk who write on this site and have quite amazing things to say all the time it's enough to make a fella's head swell.

That is until his next article is put on hold for being sensless gibberish. Oh well that gives me about a day or two to revel in this.

Thank you once again,

cheers

Richard Marcus

#6 — December 6, 2006 @ 08:44AM — Donnie Marler

Richard,
Congratulations! Well deserved!

#7 — December 6, 2006 @ 09:37AM — Pico [URL]

You write good stuff. Keep 'um coming, Richard.

-P

#8 — December 6, 2006 @ 20:12PM — Kathy Jones [URL]

The interview was wonderful reading and the collection of articles is inspiring. I especially appreciated your comment, Richard, that what you found most difficult is this:"getting the words on the page to be as exciting as they sound in my head." Really resonated with my experience, and your persistence has paid off, as evidenced in the quality of your work. Congrats!

#9 — December 7, 2006 @ 23:43PM — Al Barger [URL]

Why, some of my best friends are Canadians...

Look, all decent patriotic Americans naturally hate beady-eyed Canucks with their heads so full of lies. Brother Marcus, however, does not indulge in the head full of lies part. He will tend to make somewhat different value judgments than me in some political areas (ie he tends to be more "liberal"), but he's highly respectful of facts and strives to seek truth rather than simply win arguments.

So then, as Canadians go, Richard Marcus ain't half bad. He's one of the good ones.

#10 — December 8, 2006 @ 00:03AM — STM

"Look, all decent patriotic Americans naturally hate beady-eyed Canucks."


Never got over having your blurters kicked from here to kingdom and back in the War of 1812, eh?

Time to bloody well forget that, Al, old boy, and move on.

#11 — December 8, 2006 @ 00:48AM — Al Barger [URL]

STM, keep monkeying with US Americans, and we'll execute Terence and Philip again.

Canadians are already skating on thin ice as it is. If you read the fine print, the Patriot Act actually outlaws Canada. That whole country is just one Celine Dion album away from being the new Iraq.

#12 — December 8, 2006 @ 01:09AM — STM

Mate, I have often heard Canada described as "America's hat".

However, I have a copy of Mercator's correctional map of the world, which since north and south are nothing more than human inventions and no-one really knows what is top and what is bottom, has Australia and New Zealand at the top of the world.

The US of course is then below the equator, with Canada below that. Using this map, it is no longer America's hat, but America's undies.

I'm sure they prefer being the hat.

#13 — December 9, 2006 @ 13:20PM — Elvira Black [URL]

Lisa and Richard:

What an incredible piece. Lisa, you somehow encompassed the essence of Richard in your brief intro, including the formidable depth and scope of his work. And Richard, I felt like you were inside my head (or vice versa) as I was reading the interview--and if I read you right, that's one of the essential elements of what every writer strives for. You've got it in spades. Congrats!

#14 — December 10, 2006 @ 18:31PM — Duck [URL]

How nice of Canada to allow Indigenous peoples use of their own land. How of them.

Seems racist to me when oil companies can go on Indigenous (Crown? Who wers the crown?) Land. Receive hugh tax breaks and I am sure lax environmental controls. Why can these companies sell or do whatever they want?

#15 — December 10, 2006 @ 23:52PM — STM

Ah, it's good to see that land owned by the Government in Canada is still called Crown Land (just like in Australia).

Much of it wasn't used by indenigenous people in the sense that we understand land ownership anyway. Therein lies the problem. A conundrum now being left to others to sort out, just like in the US, with varying degrees of success. Although mostly not.

#16 — December 16, 2006 @ 17:22PM — crushkill

I really like how he loves talking about himself!

#17 — December 18, 2006 @ 17:17PM — DukeDeMondo [URL]

Richard, congratulations Good Sir, and that interview was glorious also. It does the site no end of good to have folks like yourself on here. And what a lovely man, also.

#18 — December 31, 2006 @ 17:32PM — alessandro nicolo [URL]

Yeah, like the Inuit were going to extract the oil with their kakivak's. No offense. Congrats, Mr. Marcus. Montreal Canadiens - good man.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/56679)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments