OPINION

Canadian Politics: What are The Conservatives Conserving?

Written by Richard Marcus
Published November 30, 2006

I guess the one positive thing there is to be said about the Conservative Party of Canada is they never cease to amaze me. If not on a daily basis, then at least every week those rascals have always got some new thing up there sleeve to announce that can leave me slack jawed with wonder.

For a party with the word Conservative in its title they seem far more intent on tearing down decades of work done by their predecessors than conserving anything. If they are not intent upon preserving a Canada based on respect, compassion, and tolerance, what exactly are their plans for conservation?

They obviously don't include anything to do with:


The environment
reneging on the Kyoto accord
Caring for children
repealing the universal child care program/replaced by non-refundable tax credits maximum of $1200 per year per child
The First Nations people
Allowing situations like the Caledonia blockade to create resentment against natives by letting them get out of hand and not dealing with the treaty issue under dispute.
The rights of women
Cutting five million dollars from under funded Status of Women and closing all but four regional offices across the country
Human Rights and our constitution
Opening debate in the House of Commons on the issue of same sex marriage when the Supreme Court of Canada has already ruled it unconstitutional to prohibit the unions.

While Prime Minister Steven Harper and his buddies had been promising the last item on the list since before even the last election, it's till sort of appalling to see them actually going through with re-opening the debate on same sex marriage.

The wounds have barely healed from the last time and he's giving people the opportunity to get their knives out and open them up one more time. The really nasty part of this is that no matter what anyone says or does the law can't be repealed without the government choosing to invoke the "Not Withstanding Clause" of the constitution. This clause, which was a sop to Quebec so they could have could opt out of minority language protection laws, allows a government to say, "not withstanding what the constitution says, we're going to go against it and deny people their human rights".

Since I believe you need to win a vote with at least a two thirds majority to invoke the clause, the Conservative party wouldn't be able to set same sex marriages aside no matter how much they may want to because they don't' have the votes. All this debate is doing is sending a message to those who support Prime Minister Harper's party that he's still their guy and can be counted on to conserve the bad old days.

page 1 | 2 | 3
Copy02-11-Richard portrait-72-4x4.jpgRichard Marcus is a long-haired Canadian iconoclast who writes reviews and opines on the world as he sees it at Leap In The Dark and Epic India Magazine.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Canadian Politics: What are The Conservatives Conserving?
Published: November 30, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Filed Under: Culture: Society, Politics: Government, Politics: Law and Rights, Politics: Policy
Part of a feature: Canadian Politics in Review
Writer: Richard Marcus
Richard Marcus's BC Writer page
Richard Marcus's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Richard Marcus
Culture: Society
Politics: Government
Politics: Law and Rights
Politics: Policy
All Politics Articles
Richard Marcus's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — December 5, 2006 @ 13:58PM — Lindsay D

As a voter I get irritated at this "one side can do no good" Circa CNN Crossfire weird world view.

I do not support the conservatives gay marriage position at all.

I think the conservative environmental plan is a joke.

I think the child care tax credit is more fair and can and should be expanded but the liberal vision was bureaucratic and silly.

The status of women department - thank god is not longer needs to be funded the same way because - wait for it equally exists by and large.
I would much rather direct that money directly to women's shelter and hands on charities then some government department.

Several studies shown men and women who equally work get paid the same. PC alert. Some women as a percentage of the population want to be close to the children and opt out of certain fields or promotions and leave the workforce for periods of time and this accounts for the 71%.


But like some political pundits - never admit anything that would add nuance to a discussion.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/56459)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments