Blogcritics Comments on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Comment by Clavos on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Fri, 15 Dec 2006 00:35:35 EST

I'm late to the party, but I enjoyed that, RJ.

Comment by RJ Elliott on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 06:44:49 EST

Heh. Well, perhaps it's not really "satire," but there wasn't a category for "pissed off hyperbolic ranting," so I guess the "satire" label will have to do... :-/

Comment by Dave Nalle on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Wed, 6 Dec 2006 03:17:49 EST

I don't see why this article is labeled satire. Dave

Comment by sr on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 20:20:45 EST

Nuke the unborn gay pink lawn flamingo's.

Comment by alessandro nicolo on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 17:19:01 EST

Shit, why stop at Iraq? Me, I say get the whole gang in the region. Make it a gang bang. You can call it Operation Triple Penetration. Then we'll see what Bin Laden's 'production value' is like. Tough guy.

Comment by RJ Elliott on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:33:50 EST

Heh.

Comment by SHARK on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Tue, 5 Dec 2006 06:32:46 EST

RJ, just a tip from a professional satirist: When one expresses serious, deeply-held political beliefs in a realistic manner, it shouldn't be labled as "Satire". Yer welcome, S

Comment by Dubya Bush on Satire: With Atomic Weapons, We Can Still Win in Iraq

Fri, 1 Dec 2006 05:02:05 EST

Can you believe this made it through to Google News, by NFL Picks doesn't? :-/