REVIEW

Movie Review: Douglas McGrath's Infamous - Crazy Lepidoptery

Written by Alan Dale
Published November 27, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

Infamous is very cleverly cut together, particularly in showing how Truman "betrays" each of his friend's secrets to the others, and how he polishes his research findings until they're prose. It is also less credulous than Capote. Futterman and Miller believed Capote's claim to have nearly faultless recall of conversation; in Infamous we see that sometimes Nelle's is more accurate. The structuring is perhaps a little too clever; the mini-sequences all serve to make points. And, of course, these are a screenwriter's rhythms rather than a director's — you wouldn't go to Infamous for technical wizardry. But the legendary directors of The Departed and The Black Dahlia didn't provide memorable experiences on that front, either, and those movies were not nearly as well written.

With Infamous, McGrath puts himself right at the top of the list of American screenwriters who made the transition to directing, and, like Paul Mazursky and Michael Tolkin, he goes Preston Sturges and Billy Wilder one better by showing that censorship is not a necessary precondition for wit. In the final scenes, in which Capote is not only incapable of writing the unvarnished truth but unable to metabolize his feelings for Perry, McGrath accomplishes what Woody Allen never has — blending laugh-out-loud comedy with something bordering on tragedy. McGrath pulls it off here with the lightest touch, as if the entire range of human emotions were as easy to express as choosing the color of your pencil.

McGrath has enough self-consciousness to give his movie a definite shape, but it lacks the awards-seeking self-consciousness that channels the audience's responses, making them embarrassed to say they didn't care for it. The virtues of Infamous are probably what will keep it from getting the recognition it deserves, in the short run. In Capote, the irony was so pre-conceived that although Truman Capote came across as ambiguous, the experience of the movie was not. In Infamous, McGrath's writing is a bit set, his conception fully formed, but it preserves the unexpectedness of experience and the realizations experience brings. Infamous keeps alight what Amadeus (1984) snuffed — a tragicomedy about the perversities of artistic inspiration and achievement. It's as much fun as a fundamentally disturbing anecdote could possibly be.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5
Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies of the 1990s and Comedy Is a Man in Trouble: Slapstick in American Movies.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Douglas McGrath's Infamous - Crazy Lepidoptery
Published: November 27, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Art House, Video: Comedy, Video: Drama
Writer: Alan Dale
Alan Dale's BC Writer page
Alan Dale's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Alan Dale
Video: Art House
Video: Comedy
Video: Drama
All Video Articles
Alan Dale's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 30, 2006 @ 23:05PM — Michael J. West [URL]

Well! Of all of the many reviews I've read that compared Capote to Infamous--and of course the comparison is inevitable--that makes...one, that thought Capote was the lesser.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/56299)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments