<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Don&#039;t Believe Everything You Read On The Web</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:34:51 EST</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Christopher Wanjek on Don&#039;t Believe Everything You Read On The Web</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/09/062349.php#comment-475636</link>
<description>Google news altered me to this article from Howard that mentions me and one of my columns.  For the record, I thought his &quot;chocolate&quot; article was great, certainly not one of the vapid ones I was referring too.  Right on, Howard.  And you&#039;re a brave, brave man for venturing into the (web) world of urine therapy.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">475636@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 12:34:51 EST</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Deano on Don&#039;t Believe Everything You Read On The Web</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/09/062349.php#comment-475573</link>
<description>I suspect that what we will probably see in the near future, is some form of online &quot;Quality&quot; guarantee or symbology, much like people look for Verisign when making an online purchase.

Sites could apply for recognition as a dependable information source, get vetted, ranked and rated.  Reputable sites would then be tagged, possibly showing up higher on Google or searches as a reward.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">475573@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:43:32 EST</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>