NEWS

NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool, Week 10

Written by David Mazzotta
Published November 09, 2006

All cultures and sub-cultures have taboos. There are things you just don't do and there are things you just don't say. It has been this way since time immemorial — a by-product of societies trying to keep everyone on their best behavior. Some taboos make a lot of sense. They are there to protect those who need protection and to keep civilization on track. Others are completely irrational. They are simply fashionable opinions gone wild.

Political ones are often the most severe. Here in Ann Arbor, you simply do not express non-progressive views in polite company. You either agree with a left-ish line or you remain silent. At a table full of arch-conservatives and a single liberal, any political discussion would have to be a soliloquy. If you dare vary from this doctrine and you will be deemed closed-minded. This is not surprising considering that Ann Arbor is one of the few remaining places you can still see hippies in their native habitat.

In contrast, my sainted mother, who resides amongst the blue-haired set in Sarasota, lives in constant fear of mentioning her admiration for Barack Obama. If she slips up she can count on any oldsters within earshot to rise groaning from their seats, pocket their Medicare cards, hitch their Social Security-funded green polyester pants up under their armpits, and go off about how the liberals have ruined the country with their meddling. She would then become quite familiar with the sound of antique shop doors slamming in her face.

It's not just politics. There are certain gender issues that have similar sensitivities. For example, whenever you find yourself in social situation with women present, you are tacitly forbidden from criticizing Grey's Anatomy. You may think the dialogue is inane drivel, the characters are shallow clichés, and the plots are insipid pablum — and I'm not saying I do, ladies — but you will keep it to yourself. The consequences to crossing this line are too dire to speak out loud.

In football there are not many taboos, but one of the major ones, outside of Indiana, is that you can't really like Peyton Manning. You may acknowledge his ability and the greatness of his stats, but that's it. You may go no further. In fact, if you are wise, you will instantly qualify any positive comment with, "but when the game's on the line, you gotta go with Brady."

Strange when you think about it. Peyton is telegenic and well spoken and will likely go down as the greatest QB in history. So why is it that most folks can't bring themselves to actually be Peyton Manning fans?

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7
David Mazzotta is author of the comic novels Apple Pie and Business as Usual.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool, Week 10
Published: November 09, 2006
Type: News
Section: Sports
Filed Under: Sports: Football (American)
Part of a feature: NFL Picks of a Thoughtful Fool
Writer: David Mazzotta
David Mazzotta's BC Writer page
David Mazzotta's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by David Mazzotta
Sports: Football (American)
All Sports Articles
All News articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — November 9, 2006 @ 01:49AM — Matthew T. Sussman [URL]

David, I'll tell you what I told myself:

Didn't everyone like Phil Mickelson more when he played like an atheist? (That is to say, he didn't have a prayer on Sunday.) And now that he's won a couple majors, people are sort of sick of The Mick.

I'm not sure if a Super Bowl will make Manning more likable. Personally I think he's just so likable and squeaky clean that the gut cynical reaction is to believe something's up with him, and preemptively hate him. And the fact that no Peyton Manning dirt continues to surface -- he's not a bad teammate, he's not selfish in contract negotiations, he doesn't care about statistics, he's actually funny in commercials -- well, that just makes us hate him more.

Remember the overachiever in high school? You know, the valedictorian that everyone liked, including the teachers? He was in all sorts of clubs, did volunteer work, had a steady girlfriend, and was nothing but a gentleman to everyone, including cool kids and social outcasts? Total prick, wasn't he?

That's Peyton. He may never win the big one. The big one, in this metaphor, is the hearts and minds of NFL fans.

#2 — November 9, 2006 @ 10:07AM — david mazzotta

That's possible, Suss. We live in an odd world where we want our idols to be flawed, but only appropriately so.

#3 — November 9, 2006 @ 10:28AM — Tinkerbell

He may very go on to "own every QB record" ever, but he will also still take his man-boobs and estrogen-induced tears and whine, whine, whine about choking during the big games because that's what people who only eat corn do.

#4 — November 10, 2006 @ 02:17AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Not touching the Detroit-San Fran matchup, huh? :-/

#5 — November 10, 2006 @ 11:04AM — david mazzotta

The Lions have good games as often as Mike Vick has good passing days -- just often enough to keep the loyal few strung along.

That -6 spread seems to be just right, which means it really isn't a gambling opportunity.

But at least you aren't certain to start this week at minus 1. ;-)

#6 — November 14, 2006 @ 01:22AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

So, how'd ya do?

#7 — November 14, 2006 @ 01:23AM — RJ Elliott [URL]

As for myself, I was pretty awful...I didn't outperform a single ESPN "expert" with my disappointing 8-8 week...

#8 — November 14, 2006 @ 10:08AM — david mazzotta

Spread picks were 5-2 (Huzzah!) bringing me to one game under .500 for the year.

3-3 on the money line, but with a profit of just shy of $300 thanks to the Browns and the Pack.

It's been an strange season (which happens to be the topic of this weeks column).

#9 — November 14, 2006 @ 20:41PM — RJ Elliott [URL]

Nice job! :)

#10 — December 11, 2006 @ 16:16PM — Craig

Regarding Pay-me-a-ton Manning and being a "team" player... In the cap era, a big QB's salary counts directly against what his team can afford to pay his defense. By the time Indy finishes signing the checks for Manning and his highly-paid receivers, it's no wonder what's left can't pay for enough quality defenders to stop a human pinball like Maurice Jones-Drew. Pardon me if I prefer rooting for a complete team, and the men who compromise on their own personal paychecks to keep it that way. (Though I will say Adam Vinatieri is one Colt worth every dime).

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/55559)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments