<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:07:56 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Ashleigh on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/08/091620.php#comment-740143</link>
<description>It&#039;s mostly down to the extra weight of the DSG &#039;wet&#039; box. The newer dry clutch boxes should get the penalty down a bit more.

However manufacturers figures are for an ideal manual driver, and the DSG is always going to perform the same, so in reality the difference is negligible at best.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">740143@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 19:07:56 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Carl on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/08/091620.php#comment-737046</link>
<description>Thank you for a very helpful article. However, when I read the published mpg figures (here in the UK) there seems to be an up to 10% fuel consumption penalty associated with a DSG gearbox. Granted that&#039;s better than the apparent 15-20% of a traditional automatic. But why the apparent 10% penalty?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">737046@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 3 Aug 2008 14:00:32 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ashleigh on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/08/091620.php#comment-584760</link>
<description>That&#039;s correct, it&#039;s basically the same as when manual car drivers slip it during a hill start etc. Obviously the car can use it&#039;s brakes etc to compensate so the wear is actualy lower than conventional clutch.

The DSG is being re-invented soon as well. VW have announced a 7 speed, dry clutch system capable of handleing 450ft/lb torque that will be launched soon.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">584760@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 14:26:33 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Tony on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/08/091620.php#comment-584755</link>
<description>Very good article, but still haven&#039;t seen explanation on how DSG operates from standing start - Electronic controlled engagement of conventional clutch in first gear?  Does this mean clutch is being continuously &#039;slipped&#039; when in Drive but at standstill with brakes on? Does this not lead to increased clutch wear for the clutch that includes first gear?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">584755@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 1 May 2007 14:13:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Michael Karesh on DSG: The Future Of The Gearbox</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/11/08/091620.php#comment-562484</link>
<description>Perhaps the best explanation of the DSG I&#039;ve come across. Excellent job.</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">562484@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 18 Mar 2007 11:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>