REVIEW

Movie Review: Shortbus

Written by Alan Dale
Published October 30, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3

In Shortbus, Mitchell and his actors may have started out with the determination to show us a side of character we don't generally see, but their notions of character turn out to be so conventional that the sexual proclivities are reabsorbed and neutralized. The sexual acts we witness are simply too coordinated with these conventional characterizations.

Even if you have not seen these specific characters before, they have a very "Hollywood" shape: the former hustler who's suicidal because he can't feel his boyfriend's devotion; the dominatrix who longs for unmediated, unstaged contact with other people; the couples counselor who has never had an orgasm. These three, and their various partners, come together, so to speak, at an orgy house called Shortbus presided over by a semi-transvestite hostess (played by Justin Bond, the drag half of the retro lounge act Kiki & Herb), where they learn about themselves, find the help they need, and get past false breakthroughs to real ones.

If nothing else, you will never see a movie that is more idealistic about the potential of public group sex. What I believe people quickly learn at orgies, however, is that if they go in seeking anything besides getting off, that is, if they go in looking for a lifemate, happiness, salvation, whatever, they're bound to be disappointed, and they may not even get laid. Of course, sexual exploration can be part of a process in which a person finds any or all of the above, but the hardcore sex at Shortbus doesn't have the haphazard, recreational quality such encounters have in life.

Thus, for example, the hustler's problem with intimacy is symbolized by his inability to let himself be buttfucked (as if any gay man who doesn't want to do this must have a psychological block against it). The boy who saves him from suicide is the first to penetrate him and, as a result, his life is turned around. Sorry, but that's just putting the corn in cornhole — as a matter of narrative aesthetics nothing to cheer about. In fact, the only good thing about this episode is pornographic: the hustler is hot and the boy is really cute. We hardly need the inducement of this formulaic storytelling to watch them go at it. (Altogether, the participants at Shortbus are better looking than you're likely to find at any public sex club, and much less drugged out.)

page 1 | 2 | 3
Alan Dale earned a Ph.D. in Comparative Literature from Princeton University and a J.D. from Yale Law School. He currently works as a corporate tax attorney in Portland, Oregon. He is the author of What We Do Best: American Movie Comedies of the 1990s and Comedy Is a Man in Trouble: Slapstick in American Movies.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Shortbus
Published: October 30, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Art House, Video: Comedy, Video: Drama, Video: Urban
Writer: Alan Dale
Alan Dale's BC Writer page
Alan Dale's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Alan Dale
Video: Art House
Video: Comedy
Video: Drama
Video: Urban
All Video Articles
Alan Dale's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 30, 2006 @ 22:29PM — Ty

This movie sounded much better before I learned in this review that there is male gay sex and rim jobs.

BUT if the hetero sex is hot, and the movie is interesting, I'll check it.

God knows it has to be better than the last "non-porno" to have full on sex, "Nine Songs." That movie was horrible (and I love indie flicks!)!!!!!

#2 — October 30, 2006 @ 22:32PM — Ty

"does anyone with XXX discs at hand pop Basic Instinct (1992) or Wild Things (1998) into the DVD for a five-minute whack before work?"

For Basic Instinct, yes to the Michael Douglas scene that dark-haired chick (not Sharon Stone) that almost looks and feels like a doggy-style rape, but is totally hot. The rest of the movie is not spank worthy.

Wild Things is NOT spank worthy, especially because we don't see that prude Neve's Campbell's breasts.

Neve Campbell and Sarah Jessica Parker are the biggest prudes when it comes to nudity. F*** them.

#3 — October 30, 2006 @ 23:17PM — Alan Dale [URL]

Thanks for the comments, Ty. I couldn't lose with Basic Instinct and Wild Things, because if I was wrong, and people do beat off to them, then it only proved my larger point that it's all porno.

#4 — October 31, 2006 @ 15:24PM — Alan Dale [URL]

Speaking of porny Brad Pitt, here's Robert Wilson's "Video Portrait" of him, released in conjunction with the December 2006 issue of Vanity Fair.

#5 — October 31, 2006 @ 15:35PM — handyguy [URL]

Out of 102 minutes, maybe 20 or so minutes are sex scenes, most of them at the beginning. [Mitchell, with commendable bluntness, has said he "wanted to break the audience's hymen" and deliberately shake people up a little.]

And, yes, sorry, Ty, but at least 2/3 of it is gay sex. The marketing campaign has done a fairly good job of preventing this from being 'ghettoized' as a gay movie. It's pretty charming and enjoyable - certainly more so than Nine Songs, which was a respectable dud but still a dud.

#6 — October 31, 2006 @ 16:07PM — Alan Dale [URL]

Thanks for the stats and the quotation, handyguy. I checked out your site and want to second your praise of the Janus Films collection--essential viewing for any dedicated movie lover.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/55082)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments