Blogcritics Comments on Q: Do Academic Journals Ever Get Tricked? http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:54:19 EST http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software Comment by Matthew T. Sussman on Q: Do Academic Journals Ever Get Tricked? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/29/140918.php#comment-467081 Decapound podiatric flatteners? 467081@blogcritics.org Mon, 30 Oct 2006 09:54:19 EST Comment by Phillip Winn on Q: Do Academic Journals Ever Get Tricked? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/29/140918.php#comment-466419 You needed a better title. Try: "Sciuridae Ellipticity: Apocalyptic Eschatology Through Bowling Balls" A fancier term for "bowling balls" would help, come to think of it. 466419@blogcritics.org Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:58:38 EST Comment by Matthew T. Sussman on Q: Do Academic Journals Ever Get Tricked? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/29/140918.php#comment-466417 Well, they <i>did</i> reject my scholarly essay: "Effects Of Bowling Balls On Squirrels" 466417@blogcritics.org Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:49:00 EST Comment by Phillip Winn on Q: Do Academic Journals Ever Get Tricked? http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/29/140918.php#comment-466413 Well, they <b>said</b> they beefed up their peer-review processes. It remains to be seen whether or not they actually did so! 466413@blogcritics.org Mon, 30 Oct 2006 00:20:03 EST