REVIEW

Book Review: The Medical Science of House, M.D. by Andrew Holtz

Written by Diane Kristine
Published October 17, 2006
Part of House

If I had a tendency towards megalomania, I might think The Medical Science of House, M.D. was written specifically for me. It fills such a peculiar niche, I can't quite imagine the broader audience for it.

House happens to be my favourite show at the moment. It's not, however, even the highest rated medical show on the air; that would be Grey's Anatomy. And the book doesn't explore the world of Hugh Laurie's alter ego in any depth. It's mostly a Dummies Guide to the Health Care Industry, with the show as its jumping off point, so anyone reading specifically for real insight into House might be disappointed.

That said, I really enjoyed it. But I'm a nerd.

Author Andrew Holtz, a health journalist with a Master's of Public Health degree, writes with obvious affection for the show and careful recognition that fiction has no duty to strict reality. For the most part, he refers to the show's cases that, while improbable, are possible.

At times, he gently points out where the cases depart from reality, but always in order to make some broader point. For example, the treatment of House's Vicodin addiction in the "Detox" episode is one clear example of the show deviating from medical reality. The episode's proof of addiction — withdrawal symptoms — are no proof at all, say the real-life doctors. But Holtz doesn't dwell on the bent truth, except to mention the reality the fiction illuminates; he uses the case to bring up the very real problem of impaired physicians.

The author brings expert testimony, through research and interviews, to a discussion that's often quite unrelated to any specifics of House. Holtz's purpose is not to nitpick the show, or to glorify it as an example of medical realism, but to wrap a discussion of the health care industry and medical ethics in a palatable coating. The lengthy, explanatory sidebars — which are, unfortunately, confusingly presented in the middle of the main narrative — usually don't even pretend to be connected to the show.

Still, it's an interesting discussion for those who aren't intimately familiar with the system or all the issues. It's perhaps especially so for us non-Americans who might relish an engaging lesson in the U.S. health care system we think we know so much about, usually from fictional sources.

page 1 | 2

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Book Review: The Medical Science of House, M.D. by Andrew Holtz
Published: October 17, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Books
Filed Under: Books: Entertainment, Books: Health, Books: Nonfiction, Books: Science, Review, Video: Television
Part of a feature: House
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Books: Entertainment
Books: Health
Books: Nonfiction
Books: Science
Review
Video: Television
All Books Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — October 19, 2006 @ 18:08PM — Morgenstern [URL]

"It's perhaps especially so for us non-Americans who might relish an engaging lesson in the US health care system we think we know so much about, usually from fictional sources."
Looks like I will have to buy that book, seeing that my view of the medical system in the US was largely formed by Samuel Shem's "House of God" (no, it's not a typo, it's not called "House is God"). *cough, cough* ;o)

#2 — January 8, 2008 @ 22:33PM — Bell

I saw the episode, 1-08-08, where the patient came in thinking he had Fibromyalgia and Fatique Syndrome. Dr. House went to the candy machine got a hand full of candy,put it in a med-bottle and gave it to the patient. I have both disorders and all that goes with them. That sent such a negative message to the public.It is hard enough to get the medical community as well as family members to take these auto-immune disodeers seriously, and that one scene did not help. The writers did not deal intelligently with a very serious illness, not to mention the pain Fibromyalgia causes.

#3 — January 8, 2008 @ 22:52PM — Diane Kristine [URL]

That's the pilot episode from 2004. The point was that the patient did not have fibromyalgia or chronic fatigue. Because if he did, he wouldn't have responded to a placebo. In other words, the "message" of the scene is they're real illnesses.

#4 — January 9, 2008 @ 23:56PM — Bell

Thank you very much. I understood that the patient did not have either. Do you think that viewrs will accept that scene as the patiernt did not have f/cfd or that there aren't such illnesse?

#5 — January 10, 2008 @ 00:01AM — Diane Kristine [URL]

I guess it depends on how astute the viewer is. Most probably didn't give it a thought either way, to tell the truth! But I'm not sure you can fault the show even if people misunderstand the scene's intention (because you're not the only one with those illnesses upset by that scene ... you're just a little later than most of them :)

#6 — January 14, 2008 @ 19:01PM — Bell

Thank you very much for responding. "House" is one of my favorite programs. Glad to hear some others actually paid attention to that scene. Much success with the sale of your Book. Bell

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/54498)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments