The New TV Show Power Rankings: Second Edition
Published October 16, 2006
It is time for Week Two of the "New TV Shows Power Rankings," which can't happen soon enough with so many of the decent new shows in danger of being canceled at any moment.
If you've ever wondered why it's hard for a new studio show to make it in this day and age, look no further than the carnage from last Tuesday night. The brilliant Friday Night Lights again had a horrible showing in its 8:00 time slot, because it was going up against ratings monster Dancing With the Stars. Meanwhile, as predicted in this space last week, a rerun of CSI at 9:00 managed to bring in more viewers than the recently canceled Smith had in its first three weeks.
Whether these new shows just aren't visible enough, whether we as a nation are too lazy to tune in to anything new, or whether we all just love watching Emmitt Smith and Mario Lopez dance that much, it seems obvious the populous' obsession with reality television isn't going away. So sad.
What follows is a an edition of the "Power Rankings" focusing heavily on ratings performance because, unfortunately, that is all the the networks care about and the only thing keeping these shows around.
The Top 10
1. Heroes (Last week: 2). We already have a shift at the top. Both Drew (my TV expert brother and silent partner on this column) and I still like Studio 60 more than any other new show, but the sheer success of Heroes — coupled with the fact it doesn't suck — puts it at the top of the heap. There is good news abounding for NBC's hit new show. It's pulling in solid ratings, a full first season has been ordered by the network, and last week's episode ("One Giant Leap") was one of the better shows of the fall season up to this point. Our only complaint with Heroes so far is that the Flying Male Nurse is getting the most airtime but is the least compelling character. (How many times have we seen "Peter" trying to talk to his older brother about flying? 100?) He will probably wind up being the key to the whole mystery, but for now, we are simply getting a heavy dose of a mediocre actor who whines a lot. On the other hand, we have a crazy Japanese guy, an indestructible cheerleader (who somehow is always wearing her cheerleading outfit), a mysterious single-name villain who can't be killed (at least not by bullets), and Ali Larter trying to act. That is more than enough to keep us watching.
2. Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip (1). Last week might have been Studio 60's best episode yet, as the possibility of copyright infringement really brought some tension to the set and showed how complex a live show can be. The genius of Sorkin's dramas is that he puts all of these fast-talking, somewhat ridiculous characters in truly intriguing settings. The "blood and guts" of a sports news broadcast (Sports Night), the White House, and now a sketch comedy show... that is interesting stuff. Not only that, but Sorkin's "talk as they walk" writing style works better here than either of his previous shows because this one is set in Hollywood, where people actually do interact in this way. Of course, despite all of the praise we are heaping on Studio 60, it still drops a spot in the rankings. Why? Because the ratings suck and it is probably going to get canceled. We finally get a smart show respectful enough of its audience to avoid writing to the lowest common denominator and no one is watching it. Which is what always seems to happen when people challenge the notion that the audience isn't smart enough to follow a "real" show. Next time you get upset that network television churns out formulaic, dumbed-down comedies like Two and a Half Men, just know we have no one to blame but ourselves. If we don't tune in to the good stuff, how can we expect people to keep trying to make it?
- The New TV Show Power Rankings: Second Edition
- Published: October 16, 2006
- Type: News
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Film and TV Business, Video: News, Video: Television
- Writer: Adam Hoff
- Adam Hoff's BC Writer page
- Adam Hoff's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Congratulations! This article has been selected for placement on Advance.net
The Class just took a huge downturn (if that's possible from the gutter) with this week's show. Ugh.
The Nine, Studio 60, and Friday Night Lights are all very good and the numbers they pull aren't "horrible". There could be a miracle or two to save them.
30 Rock, 20 Good Years, and Help Me Help You can be ditched now and nobody will care.
And I will disagree with you about Two And A Half Men until the cows come home. The majority of the episodes are funny and I hate missing a single one. (I'm really picky, although I admit to having liked "Joey".)
Studio 60 strted its very first show by declaring loudly over and over again that it existed strictly for the purpose of offending conservatives, specifically Christians. No one is watching. Meanwhile the king's crew still tries to insist his clothes are beautiful but everyone else is sitting back declaring him naked. I got the message - I was offended - not coming back for more. Studio 60 just give up and go away. After this much time, an apology wouldn't be accepted if any one had the brains to offer one.
Louise - good link, hopefully that can help a little bit.
Joan - Fair point on Two and a Half Men. Thanks to Arrested Development, Curb Your Enthusiasm, Entourage, Scrubs, and The Office, I just can't bear to suffer through a laugh track these days. That said, I shouldn't lump all traditional sitcoms together. I took a shot at Charlie Sheen and Co. out of sheer laziness, because I couldn't be bothered to think of a truly crappy sitcom. Don't get me wrong, I'm not a fan of the show, but I'm sure there is a lot worse out there. Probably on the same network and the same night, no doubt.
I think The Nine and Friday Night Lights truly need a "miracle" because of the ratings, while Studio 60 is kind of in a different boat. Production costs seem really high for that show and with so many film actors on board, I can't imagine this running for more than a year or two, even under good circumstances. Throw in some ratings issues and now my concern is that it won't even get a full season order. Hopefully NBC will want to remain in Sorkin's good graces and will give it a longer leash than normal.
The funny thing is that Studio 60 kind of seems to be telling its own story (or at least a version of it) as it goes. The way Matty and Danny came on board seems like it could have mirrored how many key figures on the show got involved. There is the Sorkin/Danny coke habit parallel. They've discussed offending particular religious groups while possibly offending particular religions groups. They've talked about "writing smart" versus "writing dumb" and took the stance that the audience can keep up (expressed by Amanda Peet's character in, I believe, episode two). They've talked about ratings and what kind percentage they need to retain week to week. They've talked about bloggers and credentials and all of that. And they've even served up the very good argument that niche advertising directed at quality ("alpha consumers," I think was the term) over quantity was the way to go. It's been really fascinating to watch them grapple with all these issues under the guise of a sketch comedy show, when nearly all of them apply directly to their own, fledgling new drama.
As for them attacking the religious right, I can understand your point and, as a Christian myself, was personally taken aback by it. I wondered what the impetus was and I do think it was way too heavy-handed, especially the first two weeks. But putting aside my own personal views and concerns and giving the benefit of the doubt, I think they were trying to establish dramatic tension between art/social commentary and the power of America's conservative viewing audience. Do you pull your punches for ratings or do you let things fly? I think that would be the best reason for the device. Because if some version of "artistic integrity" isn't the rationale for the subplot, than it means that Sorkin really is just taking shots at a an entire group of people, which seems extreme.
One thing I found kind of odd is that the characters on the show don't display much savvy or nuance when it comes to religion and perhaps this is a reflection of the creators themselves. Are people in Hollywood that insulated that they don't realize how complex religion is? Christianity is a massive world religion, not some strange little cult, and the people who practice that faith have various and unique world views. To hear the characters of Studio 60 tell it, everyone that falls under the enormous umbrella of Christianity (I think you can include most denominations here, including Catholicism) is a crazy Pat Buchanon clone running around demanding censorship. It seems obvious that this is not the case and the show's inability to deal with that was kind of shocking.
This was a fun read, but I have to say I was confused since I missed the first edition. I thought ... "power"? Shows that are sinking in the ratings (Studio 60) and completely doomed (Friday Night Lights) have "power"? So it might be nice to explain what you mean by "power rankings" in each round. And maybe link to the previous posts?
This week's Studio 60 was even better than the copyright infringement one, I think. I really hope the ratings pick up.
Diane Kristine - you are right, linking to the first edition would have been a good idea. I will make sure to do that in the future. For now, you can find it here.
As for the "power rankings" name, that is just a play on the fact that power rankings are everywhere now - mainly in sports. It doesn't actually refer to the amount of power the show has. It could just as easily be called the "Hot List" or something equally cliched. I just needed a gimmicky name, so I went with Power Rankings.




If Studio 60 is your top - you might want to point this out to a few people.