The Fire Unreined
Published October 15, 2006
The right wing media, like FOX News and the Rush Limbaugh show, ran for long periods of time, in the red, but were able to survive through those times because they had funders- it's hard to call them investors, since there were political payoffs and motivations rather than conventional profit motives- who carried the money-losing media for long periods of time.
Such is expected by Air America insiders to happen for them. According to insideradio.com, "Air talent Al Franken joked several weeks ago that he's flown on airlines that are in bankruptcy - anticipating that this day might come [to Air America Radio], and that operations would continue."
While that may merely be brave talk, other progressive talkers are still on the air:
"Ed Schultz says his "independently-owned and operated show is in no danger of bankruptcy or other financial obstacles." 'Big Eddie' says he now clears in over 100 markets - and there are other progressive talkers like Stephanie Miller adding stations."
Joe Gandelman of The Moderate Voice adds support:
It's important to note that two of the best progressive talk shows are hosted by Schultz and Stephanie Miller, who also isn't with Air America."Schultz opened his [Friday] show talking about his appearance on Larry King Live and addressing the Air America bankruptcy [mp3].
Gandelman points out that Schultz seems to understand "how radio works":
I heard [Schultz]'s show when he had Stu Kane on [mp3]. Kane was instrumental in helping launch Rush Limbaugh. Kane made it clear on Schultz show today that Product 1st's bottom line is "the bottom line." They want to produce a show that's good radio, good entertainment, that gets listeners and makes money. [Emphasis added]
Rob Kall almost stumbles over the solution to Air America's money troubles. He just didn't take his thought far enough: "If the money powers on the left are wise — the unions, George Soros, progressive foundations, even the smallest $5 dollar contributors — they will do all in their power to get Air America back on track." [Emphasis added]
Leave it to very conservative National Review columnist Jonah Goldberg to point to the real savior for Air America, even though he doesn't realize it as such and would never admit it: "The problem? Pacifica Radio already exists."
Pacifica Radio, founded in 1949 by Louis Hill, is a financially-struggling network which regularly broadcasts the kind of programming that Air America sought to air, and more. While many people pay the full subscription rate Pacifica asks, it survives on those as-little-as $5 contributions that Rob Kall mentioned above.
- The Fire Unreined
- Published: October 15, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Culture: Advertising and Marketing, Culture: Arts, Culture: Business and Economics, Culture: Celebrity, Culture: Media, Culture: Podcast, Politics: Local and Regional
- Writer: Realist
- Realist's BC Writer page
- Realist's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
- RSS Feeds
- All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Realist
Culture: Advertising and Marketing
Culture: Arts
Culture: Business and Economics
Culture: Celebrity
Culture: Media
Culture: Podcast
Politics: Local and Regional
All Politics Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments
Comments
Ed Schultz has peaked out and on the way out.
He is down to about 98 stations from a high of about 105. Ed has so lost it that he ridicules military officers that call and try to explain to him why it is necessary to have a victory in Iraq. Radio will be much better when Schultz is off the air; and it appears that will not be long down the road.











No, that didn't happen with Rush. I have no idea about Fox News, but I did a paper last year for my 10th grade social sciences class, and that's totally wrong about Rush Limbaugh. He never had donors, he wasn't backed by anything political, and he started out doing 2 shows both of which were successful quickly, and the national one grew in affiliates as success grew, not before. Rush Limbaugh didn't go into radio to be political- he went into it because he loved it and wanted to be a broadcaster, and picked politics to do his show on because he'd always had an interst in it, not vice versa. That's what he was saying in the article you cited (I read the whole thing). He was saying exactly what the subsequent gentleman was saying: that they did not know how to run their network as a business, and that's what the point of radio is, to make money, like any other business, not to affect elctions. So, I'm not really sure what all else you're saying, but I did need to correct you where you got it totally wrong. If you want, I can email a copy of my paper for you to learn from; it's pretty thorough and I got an A on it.