The Fire Unreined
Published October 15, 2006
When James Taylor wrote "Sweet dreams and flying machines in pieces on the ground", had he Air America in mind?
In a press release Piquant LLC, which does business as Air America Radio, announced that it has filed for Chapter 11 protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York after "good faith efforts to resolve outstanding debt with a creditor from the company's earliest days broke down." Court documents showed that MultiCultural Radio Broadcasting Inc., a creditor with whom the network had tussled in its early days, had Air America's bank accounts frozen.
You could hear the chortling from the wrong-wingers. The only rational and objective statement made by one such went: "There have been hints of impropriety and suggestions that money was not spent correctly and this bankruptcy filing confirms their dire situation."
To be fair, there is evidence to support this assertion. Recently, Al Franken, owed $360,749 by Piquant, complained publicly that his paychecks had stopped. Mike Malloy, whose contract was not renewed, is owed over $100,000 in back pay. The 25 page bankruptcy filing, reprinted at thesmokinggun.com, lists RealNetworks founder Rob Glaser as the single largest creditor who is owed more than $10 million.
These instances alone demonstrate that the operators of Air America didn't know how to handle money. One can only assert that for a shoestring operation just getting up off the ground, an awful lot of vital Air America Radio lifeblood flowed out through self-opened veins. This financial irresponsibility makes no sense when those who started Air America were themselves entrepreneurs, people who are supposed to know something about money management.
Said Rush Limbaugh, "They've never had any idea how radio works."
According to real radio professionals, the problem with the management of Air America was much more basic. Michael Harrison, the publisher of Talkers Magazine, a talk-radio industry trade magazine, said, "By running such a poor business they did a disservice to liberal talk radio by making it seem like the problem was that they were liberal."
You mean, Rush isn't Right? I'm shocked! What's the real problem, Mr. Harrison?
"Before you change the world, make sure you pay your bills."
Yeah, that would help. Rob Kall of opednews.com gets reality back on track, reminding us that even Rush was once in Air America's holey soles:
- The Fire Unreined
- Published: October 15, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Culture: Advertising and Marketing, Culture: Arts, Culture: Business and Economics, Culture: Celebrity, Culture: Media, Culture: Podcast, Politics: Local and Regional
- Writer: Realist
- Realist's BC Writer page
- Realist's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
- RSS Feeds
- All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Realist
Culture: Advertising and Marketing
Culture: Arts
Culture: Business and Economics
Culture: Celebrity
Culture: Media
Culture: Podcast
Politics: Local and Regional
All Politics Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments
Comments
Ed Schultz has peaked out and on the way out.
He is down to about 98 stations from a high of about 105. Ed has so lost it that he ridicules military officers that call and try to explain to him why it is necessary to have a victory in Iraq. Radio will be much better when Schultz is off the air; and it appears that will not be long down the road.











No, that didn't happen with Rush. I have no idea about Fox News, but I did a paper last year for my 10th grade social sciences class, and that's totally wrong about Rush Limbaugh. He never had donors, he wasn't backed by anything political, and he started out doing 2 shows both of which were successful quickly, and the national one grew in affiliates as success grew, not before. Rush Limbaugh didn't go into radio to be political- he went into it because he loved it and wanted to be a broadcaster, and picked politics to do his show on because he'd always had an interst in it, not vice versa. That's what he was saying in the article you cited (I read the whole thing). He was saying exactly what the subsequent gentleman was saying: that they did not know how to run their network as a business, and that's what the point of radio is, to make money, like any other business, not to affect elctions. So, I'm not really sure what all else you're saying, but I did need to correct you where you got it totally wrong. If you want, I can email a copy of my paper for you to learn from; it's pretty thorough and I got an A on it.