http://blogcritics.org/ A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously. en Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors Sat, 4 Nov 2006 16:01:11 EST http://backend.userland.com/rss Blogcritics.org custom software http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/15/164035.php#comment-473489 I never made the comment that is attributed to me. What is your source for this bizarre statement? "Thomas N. Hudson, Executive Director of the California Taxpayer Protection Committee, opposes Prop 1d, claiming that "there are more important things to spend money on than new vocational education facilities, energy efficiency, and seismic safety upgrades"." The debate over Prop 1D is NOT about whether schools should be funded by government. The debate is about HOW to pay for it? And is it fair to tax people in Placer County to upgrade wealthier schools in San Diego? 473489@blogcritics.org Sat, 4 Nov 2006 16:01:11 EST http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/15/164035.php#comment-458307 why are we teaching our kid to be assembly workers or low wage workers? don't they need to learn the fundamental to compete and advance further in career or be more inventive? this is some stupid bond thought out by someone that trying to make lot of money, ripping off tax payer. california future is not gonna be take over by china. 458307@blogcritics.org Mon, 16 Oct 2006 17:07:09 EDT http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/10/15/164035.php#comment-458182 pess, I am voting a negative on this prop. NO MORE BONDS. It's that simple. Year around schools don't work; if we want to improve education, make laws backing up teachers. For kids learn when they respect their teachers; just as adults. 458182@blogcritics.org Mon, 16 Oct 2006 10:31:01 EDT