Movie Review: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning
Published October 05, 2006
And what a beginning it is.
In the Cinema of the Helpless, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning reaches a new benchmark in unrelenting, stinking-bloody-abattoir-of-pain, horror. I winced at the slimy grimy blood-soaked chaos in Speak No Evil; and I squirmed in my seat during the guest suite scenes in Hostel. But I became physically ill while watching the particularly nightmarish scene in the basement, where Leatherface methodically, silently, carves a Thanksgiving turkey--except it was not a turkey he was carving up, and it wasn't a day to be thankful for.
Perhaps the grainy hand-held camera scenes and tight close-ups in the film made me a little queasy to begin with. Or perhaps it was the way the camera lingers while dark, syrupy blood pours from mangled bodies, soaking into the ground, into the carpeting, that made me not quite okay. I wondered how the hell they were going to get those stains out of the carpet. They are the Hewitt family; an insane bunch of cannibalistic rednecks that always play with their dinner.
It is 1969. Two friends are taking one long, slow trip to the war in Vietnam by way of Texas. Along for the ride are their girlfriends, a few desires, and impending doom. The Hewitt family has been going through a series of setbacks as their town, and way of life, disintegrates around them. The meat packing plant, the town's primary source of jobs is shut down, and townsfolk have nowhere else to go but away. The proud Hewitt family refuses to leave, and young--but really huge--Tommy, their disfigured and misfit adopted son refuses to stop pounding and slicing meat, whether bovine or, soon-to-be, the two-legged kind.
When told he has to leave the now closed meatpacking plant, he expresses his unhappiness by wielding a sledge hammer in a brutal scene of shattered bone, muscle and skull. Young Tommy has found a new hobby.His step-dad has found a new hobby, too. Seems the last sheriff had to leave his position rather suddenly, so Hoyt takes a fancy to the badge--after he cleans the blood off it. R. Lee Ermey plays Hoyt Hewitt with such malicious evil glee, he steals the movie. Armed with a shotgun, badge, and dark sunglasses, he's one determined patriarch who needs to put food on the table. And after that nasty business in Korea that kept him alive when food was scarce, he and Tommy seem to be a match made in hell for getting that food.
In a textbook example of why you should never take your eyes off the road while driving at high speed and being chased by a gun-toting biker chick, both the Vietnam-bound friends and their girlfriends are brought to the attention of Sheriff Hoyt. He takes them home to meet Mama, Uncle Monty, and Tommy, which is not a good thing. The truly scary thing about dysfunctional families in horror films is that they always function well together--in that insane, clannish, us-against-them kind of way. Mama Hewitt and Uncle Monty go along with Hoyt and Tommy's shenanigans. So when bodies and body parts start piling up, they just make soup, and lots of it. Poor Uncle Monty is the only one to get his comeuppance in a sudden and graphically grotesque chainsaw game of long and short, but this is the prequel, of course, to New Line Cinema's 2003 version of Texas Chainsaw Massacre.
- Movie Review: The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning
- Published: October 05, 2006
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Horror, Video: Thriller
- Writer: Iloz Zoc
- Iloz Zoc's BC Writer page
- Iloz Zoc's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
I liked the remake, and you have just increased my expectations for this one.
I'll be seeing it tomorrow. (The Departed has to come first)
me and my ladyfriend saw this a few hours ago. it was a dirty, tense, relentless, foul-mouthed and totally gory piece of trash.
five stars then = )
I agree with your comments. Funny enough I am not the type to get nausiated but this movie certenly made me want to bring up my sour patch kids. It is a good movie to see if you want to sit back and react to some thing and I can say from experience because my friends and I literaly sat there with our hands over our mouths while siting as far back in our seats as we can. Due to the shock value of this movie it took us at least five minutes to move and get up to leave after the movie ended because we couldn't move till we realized we were the last ones in the theater.
It left me with nightmares that night. Really--and that's rare for me, even though I don't like gore per se.
It's a subtle trend in today's horror that I like to call the Cinema of the Helpless. Unlike the 70s gore/shock, this trend extends that in intensity and duration, placing victims in situations of bondage and torture for prolonged sessions of "visual pain." We, the audience, are forced to helplessly watch as the victims suffer--helplessly. It's strong stuff, and not for every horrorhead, but the impact is hard.
And Ermey is unbelievably effective. Makes me really really not want to travel in rurul areas on back roads.


Founder of the League of Tana Tea Drinkers (LOTT D), expiring writer, and valet to Zombos, the noted B-movie horror actor (to his remaining and decaying fans, at least). Blogging all the horror, all the time.


Damn! We don't get this in the UK until Friday the 13th, so it's going to be a week or so before I can find out if you're right.
I hated the first remake. With a passion. But, for some reason, I'm quite looking forward to this one...