<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on Book Review: In Defense of Vikram Seth&#039;s &lt;i&gt;A Suitable Boy&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2006 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:48:57 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by theidiot on Book Review: In Defense of Vikram Seth&#039;s &lt;i&gt;A Suitable Boy&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/23/183830.php#comment-454088</link>
<description>wonder what defines &#039;high literature&#039;?

just finished reading &#039;a suitable boy&#039; and had read &#039;sacred games&#039; a few weeks back. 

how one can compare them just on the basis on the no of pages beats me. rather stupid. 
</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">454088@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 9 Oct 2006 09:48:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Ashok K.  Banker on Book Review: In Defense of Vikram Seth&#039;s &lt;i&gt;A Suitable Boy&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/23/183830.php#comment-449584</link>
<description>Mayank, you&#039;re entitled to your own opinions--as am I--but I just thought I should clarify that when I said I read &#039;A Suitable Boy&#039; in &#039;short bursts&#039;, that meant chunks of 300 to 400 pages at a time, viz. in a single reading session. Perhaps there are readers who can read the entire 1359-page book at one stretch without interruptions but I&#039;m not one of them. Apart from that one minor kibble though, I still think &#039;A Suitable Boy&#039; is a gentrified Trollopian monstrosity that collapses under the weight of its own elegance. (Incidentally, Seth&#039;s own model for the book was Anthony Trollope, not Austen or Dickens, so it&#039;s surprising that you don&#039;t mention this fact. &#039;A Suitable Boy&#039; has far more in common with Trollope&#039;s quietly melodramatic upper class soap operas than with the far more ambitious Dickens or even the more restrained and comedic-manner Austen.)

Also, it certainly doesn&#039;t follow that I didn&#039;t like the book, just because I critiqued it harshly. I also enjoy the latest airport bestseller at times; I just don&#039;t rush to defend its status as high literature. :~) Happy reading--and re-reading!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">449584@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 1 Oct 2006 02:06:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Comment by Natalie Bennett on Book Review: In Defense of Vikram Seth&#039;s &lt;i&gt;A Suitable Boy&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/09/23/183830.php#comment-446966</link>
<description>This article has been selected for syndication to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cleveland.com/newslogs/bookreviews&quot;&gt; Advance.net&lt;/A&gt;, which is affiliated with newspapers around the United States. Nice work!</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">446966@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:53:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>