Blogcritics Comments on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Comment by steve on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Fri, 6 Oct 2006 00:14:16 EDT

anybody but hillary. I dont want my tax dollars paying for another oval office carpet cleaning courtesy of slick willie!

Comment by zed on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 4 Oct 2006 23:07:37 EDT

Donnie Marler: You are probably right about your speculation about the three groups who wont be represented in the White House any time soon. What is funny is that it is not because there are smarter, more talented and more deserving white males. Its just that you have to walk on water basically to outseat a white male in our present culture. Either of the candidates that you mentioned would make a better president than our current fearless leader.

Comment by Donnie Marler on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sat, 30 Sep 2006 17:53:05 EDT

Three potential candidate profiles you will NOT see inhabit Pennsylvania Avenue any time soon. Female. Hillary Clinton is, as mentioned, far too polarizing to be a successful candidate. No other female could even win the nomination. Muslim. You'll see a Wiccan president before you see this. Minority. O'Bama? Not yet. Who else you got? Al Sharpton? Jesse Jackson? Didn't think so. (One potential exception: Colin Powell. Highly respected by a lot of people.) You won't see the rabid fringe of either party win the nomination for one simple reason. The people that do most of the voting don't like them. They scare them. There's no way in hell Russ Feingold could win an election for the presidency. Anyone who thinks he could is not lucid. O'Bama has to be given time to prove himself. Just because he's black and 'cute' doesn't make him presidential material. Wes Clark? I have friends who served under him. If he wins, it won't be because they voted for him. Both parties will, as always, elect a candidate they HOPE can appeal to enough uncommitted voters to win. You're not going to see any earthshaking nominations for the 2008 election.

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:12:33 EDT

Oh, Arch - you've been drinking again. You swore you were off the sauce....

Comment by mara on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sat, 30 Sep 2006 13:41:35 EDT

I fully support the moderate Democratic candidates for 08. Bayh and Warner top that list. This does not mean I don't support other candidates but Bayh and Warner are closer to my personal political ideology, although on some issues I do lean farther left. What's interesting is Bayh and Obama are both in Iowa this weekend. :)

Comment by Arch Conservative on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 21:31:53 EDT

That's right...... Come 2008 we're gonna bring the pain..... The bitch is going down one way or another..... The Clintons won't be allowed anywhere near the white house ever again.... VIVE MITT ROMNEY 2008!!!!

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:59:05 EDT

So what's new? You neonazi moonbats have been bashing Hilary since before Bill was elected & you had any reasons except she was married to him. I'm sure she'll just faint with anxiety when she hears you're on the warpath.

Comment by Victor Plenty on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:58:00 EDT

Don't worry, Arch. We all know the mouth-foaming psychopathic hatred certain crazy people feel toward Hillary Clinton. Being neither a Democrat nor a Republican myself, my suspicion is reserved for those who would ask me to cast my vote based on the wishes of the craziest, nuttiest, and most hateful portion of the electorate. I've never been a particular partisan of Ms. Clinton's, but if y'all aren't careful, I might go ahead and vote for her just to piss you off.

Comment by zingzing on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:57:04 EDT

oh no, hurt... me? us? her? wait. meh. no one's really been bashing on bush much here. and hillary hasn't been mentioned much at all. so what are you babbling about? and who says that most (any?) of us really want hillary to run?

Comment by Arch Conservative on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 18:52:38 EDT

You moonbats think you dislike/hate George Bush? Well I'm here to tell you that you aint seen nothing yet. Just wait until Hillary runs in 2008. We're going to make all of the Bush bashing that you moonbats have been doing for the past six years look like a sunday picnic in the park. It's going to be nothing but Hillary hate 24-7. A constant unrelenting barrage of pointing out what a total lack of humanity, sincerity, and integrity that the bitch possesses. Every mistep she's ever made or makes will be brought to light time and time again. Every opportunity to attack her will be siezed upon ferociously. We will pull no punches, show no mercy, stop at absolutely nothing to ensure that the miserable bitch becomes nothing but a footnote in the annals of US presidential history. One way or the other!

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:49:27 EDT

No, he's just pathetic & offensive. I mean, consider what he thinks are witty comebacks, like the comment about your mom. He's like the jerkoff that exposes himself at a church service because he likes to shock people & he thinks of it as humorous, like a 3-year-old. Potty humor. It's all they understand, scatology.

Comment by zingzing on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 15:20:13 EDT

i know it... I KNOW IT! but i can't help myself sometimes. maybe i'm just waiting for him to blow up and say something really stupid... but that's always. i sometimes just want to push him to the next level (i.e.-the handjob and my mom comment not too long ago), just because i think it's really funny stuff. maybe i'm just as much an asshole as he is, the little prick.

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:32:54 EDT

Zing, JOM is a juvenile minded-pervert with a gutter mentality and a potty mouth, because he has no capabilites of actually fielding any arguments. Ignore him; I do. He's not worth your time or efforts, nor mine, and acknowledging his crudities only encourages him.

Comment by zingzing on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:23:00 EDT

so, what was he saying, exactly?

Comment by Dave Nalle on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:58:34 EDT

I believe that was the non-rap version of the Sir Mix-a-lot classic "Baby Got Back". Dave

Comment by zingzing on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Wed, 27 Sep 2006 13:49:58 EDT

jom... what the hell was that?

Comment by Dave Nalle on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:08:54 EDT

Obama would be a hell of a lot better than the people speculated on in the article. He's more interesting and has marginally more sensible views on a lot of issues. Dave

Comment by JustOneMan on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 22:01:31 EDT

Nancy, Its is well document that a certain race of men like..... shall we say Big Women...so I can undestand your "taste is vindicated" Nuff said

Comment by JustOneMan on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:59:32 EDT

"o" magazine.....gee a black magazine names a two bit do nothing (Name one piece of legislations) this nice non-offensive, white looking, black man has sponsored? Hellooooo...NONE You Dems are really over the top with this idiot...

Comment by ModerateTruth on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:49:10 EDT

It's not just looks with Obama and he has not been on the national scene very long. The other day, I was driving and flipped over to CNN on XM. They were interviewing someone and I was instantly engaged. This interviewee had a strong voice, he was knowledgeable on a range of issues and he had my full attention. Only after a few minutes of listening was he identified as Obama. He is definitely going to be a contender down the road. Just One are you a shut in craving contact? Please man just give it a rest!

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:36:44 EDT

Ha-! My taste is vindicated: "O" Magazine has just named Barak Obama as one of the top 10 sexiest men in politics today.

Comment by Dave Nalle on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Mon, 25 Sep 2006 01:28:35 EDT

As for the entire roster being unappealing, well...I suspect the GOP roster will be just as unappealing to half the electorate, only instead of boring, we'll have corruption. Maybe boring would be better. The GOP already has McCain and Giuliani who are both more interesting and more appealing than anything the Dems are likely to come up with. We NEED a third party. How's that Libertarian Texan you interviewed doing so far? What do the polls show, if anything? I think he'll do well for a Libertarian, but he's not going to win despite that. I'm hoping to interview the Democrat in the race this week. We'll see if he has anything to offer. Dave

Comment by JustOneMan on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:48:58 EDT

"I wish Mao,Stalin and Pol Pot were still alive, well, & young. They were real Democrat presidential material, IMO, but born too soon."

Comment by RJ Elliott on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:23:14 EDT

"I wish Shirley Chisholm were still alive, well, & young. She was presidential material, IMO, but born too soon." And a borderline communist...

Comment by Nancy on 2008 Speculation: The Democrats

Sun, 24 Sep 2006 04:22:33 EDT

That's probably why I can't remember him very well, Dave. He just sort of blends with the background. As for the entire roster being unappealing, well...I suspect the GOP roster will be just as unappealing to half the electorate, only instead of boring, we'll have corruption. Maybe boring would be better. We NEED a third party. How's that Libertarian Texan you interviewed doing so far? What do the polls show, if anything?