OPINION

S.O.S From the Next Front

Written by Brad Schader
Published September 18, 2006

Ninety one miles from the very spot where I'm writing this there is trouble in its infancy. Ninety one miles from my home town is the so called “capital of the Third World” AKA Havana, Cuba: home of this year’s “Non-Aligned Movement” nation meeting.

For those like myself who never have heard of this before, it is a meeting of the leaders of 55 nations to discuss the chief threat to world peace, also known as the United States. The guest list for this meeting includes such great and freedom loving countries as Iran, Venezuela, Pakistan, India, South Africa, Zimbabwe, and Bolivia. See, Pakistan and India can agree on something after all. We can bring peace.

Bad joke. I joke when I am stressed. This meeting is the real life equivalent of SPECTRE for any James Bond fans out there. For the non-fans, SPECTRE stood for “SPecial Executive for Counter-intelligence, Terrorism, Revenge and Extortion” and was an international terrorist organization out for world domination. The current global situation is pretty much right out of an Ian Fleming novel with this NAM group as the super-villian.

With these nations meeting to plan our demise, Iran and Cuba coming together is worse than any U.S.S.R. treaty with Cuba could ever be. Cuba is still only 91 miles away and Cubans know how to get into this country undetected. They have perfected it and our laws encourage it.

Many people are unaware of the Cuban Adjustment Act of 1966, but it stands to create a serious threat with an Iran/Cuba treaty. It is also known here as the “Wet Feet/Dry Feet” policy. It basically says that any Cuban that makes it to dry land gets to stay while any caught in the water are deported. With it only being a 91 mile boat ride, does anyone else see the problems with an Iranian/Cuban alliance?

The hurricanes last year showed us that we are not ready for a major tragedy. What happens if terrorists get in from Cuba? I mean we have 150,000 tired and drained troops in Iraq and another 20,000 in Afghanistan, so what do we have to defend us from this very real and growing threat?

page 1 | 2
I have been told by my friends that I am a politics junkie with a Ph.D. in Pop Culture, specializing in conspiracy and film. I have always felt that, much like we study old plays and poems, that the meaning of life can be found in movies and song lyrics. They are just the plays and poems of the day.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
S.O.S From the Next Front
Published: September 18, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Politics
Writer: Brad Schader
Brad Schader's BC Writer page
Brad Schader's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Brad Schader
All Politics Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — September 18, 2006 @ 08:16AM — JP

Just what we need, something else for people to remind us to be afraid of.

#2 — September 18, 2006 @ 10:23AM — brad schader [URL]

Before the war in Iraq I was asking why we were not invading Cuba before. Every reason given to invade Iraq applied to Cuba AND Cuba is only 91 miles off our coast.

Iran we have been at war with since 1979. This is not reminding people to be afraid. This is two of our enemies coming together. The media is ignoring this real threat to report imagined ones.

I will keep writing about this as long as it takes.

#3 — September 18, 2006 @ 21:32PM — PeterJ

Great article Brad,

When the Soviet Union disbanded there was a collective sigh of relief from the entire free world. The five remaining communist countries did not pose any immediate threat to the United States on their own and China, the largest potential problem, has established solid trade relations which pretty much guarantee no involvement in any sort of action.

The thought that with the USSR the communist threat has been eliminated is very much mistaken. The communist goal is still, as much as ever, to dominate the world. I realize in this day and age where so many don't even remember when Russia was a communist state and so many more have no idea of the ancient history involving the Cuban Missile Crisis or how close to actual nuclear war we came that this threat sounds so cliche' but that line of thinking is exactly what the communist party relies upon.

The goal of domination will be obtained through any one or more of several devices. Domination could be won through internal revolution, military conquest, or convergence of capitalistic and communist systems into one world government.
Where have I heard that term used before? Still yet it never fails to send chills up my spine.

Right now we are concerned over North Korea establishing Nuclear Capabilities. If this were to happen and their strength were combined with a strong ally and communist Cuba, as you say, only 90 miles south of Florida a military action could be considered. This, taken into consideration our inept border control and the Cuban 'Wet feet/Dry feet" policy it almost serves as an open invitation to smuggle hoardes through Fl.

Another action to consider is through internal revolution. This may seem far fetched until you look at the current politics of our country.
In my lifetime I have never witnessed the devisiveness we are experiencing today and that includes the sixties. Again, this is what the party plans on, a civil war for us is a foot in the door for them.

This is a precarious time for us. This is a time we should be standing firmly together, instead we have a presidential administration tearing us apart. This is a time we should be financially stable, rather we have a president who has given us the highest deficit in history and this is a time that we should have a strong army rather than worn out troups fighting an unknown, unseen enemy who will never be depleted.

This is a time we need strong leadership more than ever rather than a posturing sycophant taking chances with our lives for the sake of nothing more than how he is perceived in history,
to hell with all of us.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/53024)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments