Politics And Media In The U.K.: Cult of Personality
Published September 10, 2006
Tony Blair — when will he go? How will his departure affect other Blairites in the party? Who's bitching about who? Will Gordon Brown settle for a promise that this year's Labour Conference will be Tony's last? And so on and so on, ad nauseum.
The British media have been busy creating a personality cult around Mr. Blair over the past week or two that is just sickening. Instead of focusing on the policies, we've had pages upon pages of "political analysis" in newspapers and online, exploring such important questions as "When will Blair go?" and "Will Gordon Brown be satisfied?"
Don't get me wrong — the question of who runs our country is no trivial matter. But the skill of the mass media has been to marginalise the policies of Mr. Blair and the policy changes we can expect should he be replaced with Mr. Brown, and focus instead on the personalities and the people. The BBC has created a whole sub-section on its site, filled with articles such as today's headline, "Blair calls for halt to sniping" and previous gems, including this morning's "Blair tries to rein in squabbling" and yesterday's "Clarke reignites leadership row". Needless to say, none of these articles discussed policy matters.
The print media has been no better. Every newspaper, from The Guardian to The Daily Mail, has been focusing on the tremendously important leadership battle — who said what, who's allied with whom, political in-fighting, and other distractions.
Why has a personality cult been created? In order to disguise the fact that, essentially, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown are the same. As John Palmer observes, "It is commonly observed that the ferocity of the Blair/Brown conflict stands in stark contrast with the slight or even non-existing policy differences between the prime minister and the chancellor."
They come from the same ideological stable (after all, they both helped create "New Labour"), the same system, the same mold. In fact, it hardly matters whether Blair stays or goes, because in terms of policy we should not expect anything significantly different no matter what. During his reign, Tony Blair was responsible for implementing foreign policy that resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands of people, helped all the way by the mass media, and there is no reason to suggest Gordon Brown will be any different. By creating a cult of personality and pretending it really matters whether we have a "Blairite" Labour or a "Brownite" Labour, the media is once again helping to whitewash the crimes that, as senior members of the ruling party, both men are responsible for.
- Politics And Media In The U.K.: Cult of Personality
- Published: September 10, 2006
- Type: Opinion
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Politics: Policy, Politics: Government, Politics: Elections and Candidates, Politics: War and Terrorism
- Writer: The Heathlander
- The Heathlander's BC Writer page
- The Heathlander's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
#1 robert hooper
i am soberly measuring my words when i say that Jane Gardner's piece on the cult of personality and British media is brilliant. She cuts through deceit like knife through butter.
I also heartily endorse the views of hooper on mainstream British media and agree with him that it seldom serves the interests of the people.



Jane Gardner's article should be reprinted, without comment, in every mainstream British newspaper.
The mainstream British Press, guided as it is by the influences of their proprietors, (most of whom are globalist Bilderberg members), will never publish
serious or robust criticism of policies that affect their own, undisclosed interests.
This is part of a world wide conspiracy at the very top.
As Gore Vidal said on the BBC's "Today" programme (and broadcast this very morning), it is the gas and oil interests (of America) that has taken the (democratic) principles of the Republic from the American Constitution and in effect has created a poltical coup in which the Bush Gang' (my terminology) has hijacked those principles with the consequences of 'no lives lost in Washington', while thousands of real lives are being lost regularly elsewhere in the World. These innocent victims including American and the Coalition forces as well as the indigenous folk who have had the misfortune to be born in those parts of the World which have caught the jealous eye of Bilderberger's malicious parasites.
Blair is nominally the British Prime Minister for the next 12 months (or thereabouts).
He has now lost the trust of his colleagues as well as the Electorate.
As we now know, this is due entirely to either his supine subvervience to Bush (and possibly greed) should he be tempted to consider influential post-political appointments that usually interest former power-crazed Executives.
I cannot speak for others, but I hereby declare that Mr Blair no longer has any Authority to speak or act for me, a British Citizen.
If any politician on the World Stage acknowledges or heeds Tony Blair, please know that this man does not represent me in any capacity whatsoever.
Robert Hooper
Stamford