REVIEW

Movie Review: Inside Man

Written by Mel Odom
Published August 13, 2006

I have to admit a weakness for movies that are thinking thrillers. A film that makes me think — not only about what's going to happen next, but what's really going on that the director and actors aren't yet revealing to me yet. This keeps me on the edge of my seat and always captures my full attention.

From the time I saw the opening trailers of Inside Man, I knew I had to see the film. I missed it when it went through the theaters and regretted it. But I couldn't get anyone to watch it with me. This is one of those films where you whisper back and forth to each other, trying to prove that you're cleverer than the writer, director, and actors.

I have to admit, I figured out most of the plot as the movie progressed, but I did so at the proper times. During the two hours I watched, I was nailed to the seat and wasn't even tempted to hit the pause button on the DVD player.

Inside Man is a slow-burner of sorts, though it starts out with the slam-bang action fest during the bank robbery that takes place at the start of the film. The thieves show cutting-edge tech by taking the cameras out with an infrared light projector, throw out smoke grenades, and start screaming at people to get down while waving AK-47s in their faces.

Almost immediately, a patrolman discovers the bank robbery and it looks like everything is about to turn bloody. The action switches to Detective Frazier (Denzel Washington), who's currently under investigation by Internal Affairs for $140,000 that went missing from a bust. He's put in charge of the negotiation situation, though.

Some attention is paid to the arrival of the SWAT team and how the two different law enforcement mindsets (negotiate versus kill-'em-all) operate differently, but not enough is revealed to really show the inner workings. It almost looks like the bank robbery is going to be solved in the first thirty minutes, except that the bank robbers turn out to be too calm, too controlled. Frazier gets the feeling immediately that something is wrong.

The action spins out again, picking up the story of Arthur Case (Christopher Plummer in a role that he plays to the hilt). Case is strangely concerned that, out of the numerous banks he owns, the robbers have chosen to hit this one, which is probably the most secure of them all. You know from the start that Case has something in the bank he doesn't want anyone else to know about.

page 1 | 2
Mel Odom is the author of over 100 novels. Winner of the American Library Association's Alex Award for 2002 and runner-up for the Christy in 2005, he's written in several genres, including tie-in novels for Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, Without A Trace, and novelizations of Blade, XXX, and Tomb Raider. Thankfully, he's learned to use his ADHD for good instead of evil.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
Movie Review: Inside Man
Published: August 13, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Suspense and Mystery, Video: Drama, Video: Crime, Video: Adventure, Video: Action, Review
Writer: Mel Odom
Mel Odom's BC Writer page
Mel Odom's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Mel Odom
Video: Suspense and Mystery
Video: Drama
Video: Crime
Video: Adventure
Video: Action
Review
All Video Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 13, 2006 @ 10:48AM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

**SPOILERS**

Numerous things in this one that confused me to no end.

**SPOILERS**

How did they build the wall in a busy bank without someone knowing/hearing?

How did none of the employees actually notice it for a week+?

What was the hole for?

What happened to the ring? Denzel showed it at the dinner and then it was gone.

Why would Denzel go after the bank owner at the end? The owner was the one facing a major problem.

Why did they waste so much film time on the bank robbery? They could have given us the same information in about a half hour. It irritated me to no end when I figured out how little of any of it was important. That ruined the movie more for me than anything else.

#2 — October 7, 2006 @ 21:01PM — Katie McNeill [URL]

I enjoyed this a lot. It did have some plot holes, but over all I thought it was pretty good.

#3 — October 29, 2006 @ 00:04AM — Gage Richard

How did they build the wall in a busy bank without someone knowing/hearing?

How did none of the employees actually notice it for a week+?

What was the hole for?

What happened to the ring? Denzel showed it at the dinner and then it was gone.

Why would Denzel go after the bank owner at the end? The owner was the one facing a major problem.

Why did they waste so much film time on the bank robbery? They could have given us the same information in about a half hour. It irritated me to no end when I figured out how little of any of it was important. That ruined the movie more for me than anything else.

#4 — February 17, 2008 @ 11:44AM — Think for yourself

How did they build the wall in a busy bank without someone knowing/hearing? They were in different rooms, and the robbers move people from time to time.

How did none of the employees actually notice it for a week+? I dont think you would notice since its only a storeroom, not your workplace.

What was the hole for? Its a WC for clive owen :-)

What happened to the ring? Denzel showed it at the dinner and then it was gone.

the ring is a piece of evidence, he returned it to the police station.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/51518)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments