Blogcritic of the Month, August 2006: Al Barger
Published August 04, 2006
I try to play nice, but at some point I do not ever intend on suffering fools gladly. Largely that's because I've dealt with enough dysfunction in different ways from my own people to know that if you say things that people really don't want to hear, some of them will give you as much abuse as you're willing to take in order to shut you up. I'm just standing up for myself.
I get accused of being angry, though I rarely am over anything that's less than life or death. I've noticed though that this charge is almost always made by people who are obviously themselves angry with me. People with ill will prefer to think, or to have others think, that I'm in fits of rage and spitting bile. Maybe I'm not communicating well sometimes, but a lot of that is clearly just projection.
In my personal and family experience, I've found that polite silence does not solve problems though, but only leaves them to fester. I don't want to be hateful, but I will confront bad ideas that screw people up, and especially bad ideas with broader social or political negative consequences. Moreover, the stuff that people are most sensitive and inflamed about in religion or race or politics is just exactly the stuff where they most need to be challenged.
In short, I'm not INCLINED to fight, but I will say whatever I think needs said, and I will not be bludgeoned into silence with cheap hatefulness and abuse. You can disagree with my opinions in all kinds of directions, but if I perceive that someone is being malicious or dishonest, I'm not inclined to just let that go without rubbing their nose in it a bit. It's for their own good (Ed. note: said with a smiley face).
I say the same things in person that I do online. However, I do not insist on talking politics or religion with people who aren't interested in such conversations. Also, it's probably harder to take me ill when I'm slapping you on the back and sharing my stash. Here's a sample of how I work and play with others, a visit to local radio WKWH during the Senate campaign.
You're the first Blogcritic of the Month who does a lot of political writing (and commenting). What do you think of the current state of political discourse in the country? Does the atmosphere here at BC reflect what's going on in the country as a whole?
I'd say the state of political discourse in the country is actually pretty good overall. Sure, there's a lot of foolishness and hatefulness tossed around. From an idealistic point of view of how things should be, it's not great. However, wearing my "conservative" hat, I'll look at things relative to how they could be and how they have been historically. From what I can tell, our political discourse is broader, deeper and more open than it has ever been. There is a much broader and more easily accessible range of thought available to interested people since the Internet and cable/satellite TV has taken off in the last decade or two. I know I've got hundreds of times more stuff available to me here and now than I did sitting in the same house as a teenager in 1980. Even just C-Span is pretty significant. I love watching candidate debates from other parts of the country, seeing directly what the arguments look like in a Vermont gubernatorial election, or a Louisiana senate debate.
- Blogcritic of the Month, August 2006: Al Barger
- Published: August 04, 2006
- Type: Interview
- Section: Sci/Tech
- Filed Under: Culture: Administrative, Culture: Arts, Culture: Media, Sci/Tech: Blogging
- Part of a feature: Blogcritic of the Month
- Writer: Lisa McKay
- Lisa McKay's BC Writer page
- Lisa McKay's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
That was funny about the dog. The low-keyed approach followed by the surprising punchline reminds me of a Steve Martin joke -- something like:
"I'm so depressed about my girlfriend. Umm ... she's not among the living anymore. I guess I kinda blame myself. Yeah, see we were at a party and we had an argument. She had been drinking a little and she demanded that I drive her home. I refused. She continued to insist. I didn't want to drive her home, so I shot her."
I don't usually comment on Al's posts, but I usually read them and the predictable arguing that ensues. I just wanted to say that, regardless of who I think is right or wrong about the various issues (and he is, of course, wrong about Skynyrd), I have always been impressed with Al's ability to respond to attacks, even personal attacks, with grace and often a sense of self-deprecating humor. That's refreshing.
That is some funny shit. Nearly as funny as his praise of my sorry confused ass in the interview.
A pity Lisa chose to use my nice quote instead of my critique of Al's scary beard which I also offered as an option.
Dave
/Jamaican accent
BOO, big Al dissin' Hunter da writer...
HOORAAAAAY BEER!
/end accent
gratz Al
Excelsior?
Al is the antithesis of everything a gay man wants in another man. I love you, Al Barger.
I don't always agree with Mr. Barger, but he is hands down my favorite guy to read on BC because I always find myself laughing out loud at his rather unique take on things.
Whether he's duking it out with fans of the Dixie Chicks or egging on the likes of Rubberneck (the guy who's posted over 100 angry posts on my review of Neil Young's Living With War CD) or even going toe to toe with Mother Mary herself, Al's quick, acerbic wit meets them blow for blow everytime.
He is without a doubt a very intelligent, and very, very funny man.
And you BC editors may have just opened up a whole new can of worms by giving Uncle Al what ammounts to a mandate.
::::Shhhuuuder:::::
Congrats Al.
-Brother Boyd
Al,
I hate that you gave props to a sandwich over Neil Young, but you are a good writer and I congratulate you on your honor.
Martin
Omitted from the annals of this rather amusing Q&A is the fact that somewhere on CNN's server there exists a picture of the Senatorial hopeful, because they like to have photographs of candidates. Now if only someone could find it...
... Oh, here it is.
Suss, yer a naughty boy!!
heh..thanks fer the linky...good blackmail material
now, i wasn't that cereal with my previous comment, besides giving gratz ta big Al...
so, for the Record... ya gotta luv the guy, especially considering that he can write so proliferously while only having taste in his mouth...
i mean, c'mon... the guy likes Prince...
heh
but , i digress...
XOXOXOXOXO, big Al
Excelsior?
Al, congratulations on being honoured. It was nice to get to learn more about you.
See, Al, Libertarians DO get elected to some things!
Way to go-well deserved!
Clavos
Al is the antithesis of everything a gay man wants in another man. I love you, Al Barger.
Silas, I've heard that some gay men go for the 'bear' look and Al certainly has it is spades.
Dave
Congrats, Al. I don't always agree with you but you do some interesting, engaging writing, especially on music.
Thank you all for your kind words.
I especially want to return the love to Brother Silas. Thanks, buddy- right backatcha.
Duane, thanks particularly for recognizing my efforts at grace under fire when folks are hatin' on me. I try. It's a frequent struggle to figure an appropriate response without unnecessary harshness when folks are losing their little minds on me. It's like Harry Powell said at the burlesque show.
Phil, I'm most pleased to hear you liked my PETA story. That story is absolutely true, by the way. I was looking for just the place to make that connection on the page, and Lisa's question was a perfect innocuous setup.
Gonzo, obviously I'm not a big fan of HST. I'll admit though that it gave me a second's pause for the sake of not wanting to hurt your feelings by further bashing your hero. But I figured you'd get over it. Plus, yes Prince Rogers Nelson is about 100 times more significant than Rush. But I still love you.
Dave, my beard has powers. You should indeed be scared of it. Don't anger The Beard. You've been warned.
Finally, Suss and the "blackmail" picture. That image was a casual snapshot taken at the Mercer Museum near Philadelphia. The tri-corner hat came from some display of Revolutionary War stuff.
Personally, that's one of my favorite pictures of me. Yet I got a lot of grief from my own people over this. I had this up as a campaign picture in the first part of 2004 before I got some other pictures, including the one Lisa picked out for this story. A number of Indiana Libertarians were absolutely raising hell with me over how bad a picture this was for a campaign site. It was as if one little archaic hat put me in with the fool druid we had running for governor of CA campaigning in his cheesy robes. PS I still like the picture.
lol..oh Al..
why thanks fer spending a picosecond pondering my non-existant feelings...
and i'm glad ya got the Honor here...
oh yes, and HST ain't a "hero" to me, just someone whose writings i enjoyed, and to me, served in a Twain/Swift type position as a satirist whose lies and "fish stories" communicated more Truth than most "straight reporting"
as fer Rush/Prince argument... well you enjoy what ya like... we'll work on yer being tone deaf...
XOXOXOXO
Excelsior?
Finally, Suss and the "blackmail" picture. That image was a casual snapshot taken at the Mercer Museum near Philadelphia. The tri-corner hat came from some display of Revolutionary War stuff.
I'll match your goofy costumed picture and raise you this picture.
Dave
Dave, your costume in that picture probably wouldn't be taken for a "costume" in these parts- more like Sunday go-to-meeting clothes. In any case, it's far less Satanic than your standard bio picture at the bottom of all your BC articles.
Plus it's on your own website. Al's CNN hosting pretty much kills the competition. Lord knows, Dave, what pictures you haven't shown us.
/agree with both Al and Suss...
Dave, yer bio pic/Anton LeVay imitation is still the best...
on the other hand, yer "english swine" elitist pig graphic is still the finest representation of you on the inside...
but i bet you could clean up in the California satanic circles as the reincarnation of their dark "bible's" Author
mwahahahaHHAAHAHahahHAHHAhahaHHAHAhahaHAHAHahaaaa
did i say all that out loud?
Excelsior?
Congratulations, Al, and I should herein acknowledge my debt of gratitude:
Brother Barger (as he would say) is the one who recruited me for Blogcritics, emailing me after reading my blog and encouraging me to contact EO about joining up. Right after I did so, he emailed me a congratulations, saying, "I'm proud to have brought a REAL writer on board."
Hey, Al, that compliment--and your vast and high-quality contribution--makes me conscious of how much more I could and should be doing for Blogcritics. Which is the best thing I could say about any writer on here: you make me want to be a better one.
The ass-kissing now out of the way, I should add that there's nobody more fun to disagree with in terms of the thing we most have in common: our all-encompassing musical tastes. (If you can call what Al has "taste").
Brother West, thanks for your fine tribute. I'll note that your work here has fully justified my initial high estimate.
As to musical taste, to each his own. You can have Mariah Carey and the Dixie Chicks and leave Elvis Costello to me. Whatever works for you.
Well, maybe not Mariah Carey (ugh)...how about if I take the Dixie Chicks, we can share Elvis Costello, and I'll leave Sinead O'Connor to you?
ahem. sinead o is vastly superior to the dixie chicks. and i second prince 100 times over rush. meha.
Al Barger is a bleeping idiot. It just highlights how bad a site this is.
well Walter, thanks for sharing... i guess
could you elucidate the reasoning behidn your statement?
cuz he may indeed be a *bleeping idiot*
but he is OUR bleeping idiot... and some of us might get a bit defensive...
i'm just sayin'
Excelsior?
Thanks to the previous commenter, but Dylan was right when he said "you don't need a weatherman to know which the way the wind blows" because Al and Navin don't seem that far apart.
His responses are full of a "cheesy type of egoism, and petty narcissm[sp]" so it's no wonder he can spot it.
So you pulled in more page views than BC for a few days, eh? Considering that you have your home page set to your own site, one has to ask if you block your own IP?
From reading your "reviews" of rock music, it appears you already do without a sense of taste. Pick another one.
The fact that you don't understand Thompson says more about you then it does him. He was actually working as a novelist who got jobs as a journalist. Hence, the creation of the genre name "gonzo journalism" to identify what he did because he was doing something different. No one except teenage idiots, and apparently adult idiots, ever thought his stories were 100% factual.
You are not a better writer than him (narcissism alert). Have you got yourself a paying gig with a professional magazine, newspaper or website? Anyone turning your writings into a feature film? Please cite.
But don't take my opinion; we'll let history be the judge and see if any esteemed writers and colleagues take note of your eventual passing. Funny that you would reference Hitchens as he wrote a nice obit about Thompson at Slate.
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/51030)
This is one of the funniest things you've ever written, Al: