REVIEW

The Friday Morning Listen - Rostropovich - Bach Cello Suites

Written by Mark Saleski
Published August 04, 2006

It was a very, very short commute this morning. Counting only the distance from the bedroom door to where I'd left my laptop on the living room floor, then to the couch—15 feet. That sure beats my normal 27 miles. This wouldn't be too hard to get used to. Who needs work? Why not a permanent vacation? OK, there's that money problem. Got it.

It took me a couple of days to relax. In fact, the first full day we were here I fell into a long afternoon nap that featured a large slate of brain cobweb-clearing dream vignettes. These tend to occur when I've been under a certain amount of stress. Between the scary bit where my father shows up at the front door with one eye closed, proclaiming he "had trouble writing at the mall"...to me telling Tom Waits how his next album should be arranged, I knew that the 'ole grey matter needed some maintenance.

Now that we've had nearly a week of sunny skies, incredibly fragrant ocean air, and many hours of uninterrupted music, things seem a little less, uhm....foggy. Thank goodness we're here for two weeks.

This morning I woke to yet another change in the weather. A cool, light rain was falling. No matter, take the dog out, put on the coffee and settle down to some music. Though at first I had a hankerin' for some Ornette Coleman, the diplomat and kind-hearted part of me decided to give TheWife™ a break and put on some J.S. Bach. There are hundreds of recordings of Bach's cello suites employing a wide variety of instruments. The one that started it all was of course the Pablo Casals version. Folks will argue back and forth about which set of suites is the definitive one. I have no idea, since I don't own a Casals recording and the only others I've ever heard were done by Yo-Yo Ma and Edgar Meyer (on the double bass).

What I do know is that the Rostropovich set is the first one I purchased and I love it to death. There's a mesmerizing quality to this music that carries with it a whole lot of emotion. It's the kind of quiet music that I've heard people put on as background. That's just not possible for me. Too many interesting twists and turns here for aural wallpaper. What's strange is that the music seems to fit into the background noises of this small neighborhood: the wind swishing through the trees, the sound of sea gulls, the occasional horn from a boat.

On second thought, maybe that's just me leaving my "real" life behind while allowing a total immersion in the moment.

Pass the coffee pot please.

Mark Saleski is a writer and music obsessive based out of the Monadnock region of New Hampshire. On his best day, he hopes to channel the ghosts of Lester Bangs and Jack Kerouac. He spends the hours of 9:32PM to 1:37AM carving out music reviews and essays for Jazz.com, Blogcritics.org and other publications.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Friday Morning Listen - Rostropovich - Bach Cello Suites
Published: August 04, 2006
Type: Review
Section: Music
Filed Under: Music: Classical
Part of a feature: Friday Morning Listen
Writer: Mark Saleski
Mark Saleski's BC Writer page
Mark Saleski's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Mark Saleski
Music: Classical
All Music Articles
All Review articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — August 4, 2006 @ 14:11PM — Snarkattack [URL]

You must listen to the Anner Bylsma recording, that one is my absolute favourite! It's not perfect but it's so goddamn soulful.

Darn, there is also a recording of the suites by a well-known viola da gamba performer (I only know because I play early music, so it's not common knowledge to classical music buffs) on a viola da gamba which I have to say sounds rather nice. But I'm biased there - the gamba is just...wow.

#2 — August 4, 2006 @ 14:59PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

wow, i'll have to look for that.

there's also transcriptions for the trombone...don't know about recordings though.

#3 — August 4, 2006 @ 17:35PM — Raymond c Lange jr.

Maybe the salty air will clear the head and you can bang out some awesome reviews or at least mellow ones. GOOD ONE! Ray

#4 — August 4, 2006 @ 19:58PM — Gordon Hauptfleisch [URL]

Ah, Bach... Evocative article, matched by choice of "longhair" music. Have a great vacation.

#5 — August 4, 2006 @ 20:02PM — Mark Saleski [URL]

gordon, what's the history of the usage of "longhair"? the only time i've seen it used in reference to classical was in an old mash episode when winchester attempted to play some mahler on the jukebox.

just common usage in the 50's?

#6 — August 5, 2006 @ 00:03AM — Gordon Hauptfleisch [URL]

Mark--Here's more than you probably wanted to know. I was familiar that the roots(!) of "longhair" in relation to Classical artists came from 19th Century intellectuals/Romanticism (notably German) who wore their hair long, but not how it developed into a specific Classical music sense.

So here's what the "Mavens' Word of the Day" has to say about its evolution up to the '50s and '60s--and now I am further enlightened, too:

The word longhair (or longhaired) does refer to people--specifically men, on whom it is, or was at various times, unusual--with long hair, but the implications of this have changed over time.

In the nineteenth century, long hair was chiefly worn by intellectuals or artists. There are assorted examples from the late nineteenth century of longhaired applied to such people: "Romanticism...was fermenting still...in certain long-haired German artists at Rome" (G. Eliot, Middlemarch).

In these examples, longhair(ed) is being used literally, but by the early twentieth century it became current in the sense 'artistic; intellectual', without reference to the actual length of hair worn by a person thus described. A few examples: "Carol, honey, I'm surprised to find you talking like a New York Russian Jew, or one of these long-hairs!" (Sinclair Lewis, Main Street); "The long-haired critics were too preoccupied with Kafka and Henry James" (The New Yorker, 1952).

By the mid-1930s, a subsense developed that referred to classical music (either a performer or fan thereof). This was used chiefly by jazz musicians and journalists: "Benny [Goodman] has also become a patron of long-haired composers....He gave the first performance of the new Concerto for Clarinet and Orchestra that he commissioned from Aaron Copland" (Time, 1950). By about 1950 the noun longhair was in use in the sense 'classical music': "Classical music, too, is gaining in the field....M.G.M....reports that 10 per cent of its business is 'long hair'" (N.Y. Times, 1952).

While this sense seems to have fallen out of use in the 1960s, a new meaning arose at the end of that decade: 'a person wearing long hair, especially a hippie; (broadly) a person who is politically liberal': "He went along to the bank with another longhair, a member of our commune" (American Scholar, 1973). This sense has taken over the word longhair and is the only way you'll likely encounter it in current use, but during the middle years of the century, the 'artistic/intellectual person' and 'classical music (performer/fan)' meanings were the ones that mattered.

#7 — August 7, 2006 @ 11:27AM — DJRadiohead [URL]

Excellent stuff as always, Sir Saleski. TWTWIM married might be in need of this set.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/51160)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments