OPINION

E3 2007 Not Canceled, Really?

Written by Ken Edwards
Published August 01, 2006

Note: Sunday, July 30th, Next-Gen broke the story saying that the ESA (Entertainment Software Association) was going to make a major announcement about E3 (Electronic Entertainment Expo) including the fact that major vendors had pulled out, among other unsubstantiated rumors. This created much debate from blog to forum across the Internet.

Since then, a press release by the ESA, and an interview of Doug Lowenstein in the Wall Street Journal has cleared up many questions (while creating many more questions, of course). However, this was mostly written before those events, and left as originally written, with the exception of what is now fact.

E3 is the yearly media circus set in May where the gaming industry shows off everything that is new in the world of gaming. Though the event has been press/industry only, it was not impossible to get through the gate. Next year's E3 will be by invitation only.

Though not all questions have answers, the show that is E3 will never be the same again.

E3 will be downsized from the L.A. Convention Center and an attendance of around 60,000 (in 2006) to a set of hotel rooms in L.A. with a target head count of around 5,000.

That is a big change, but much of the future of E3 remains to be seen — even after today's events.

I am not sure what to think about the small show in a hotel. I am going to wait for more news from the ESA. Is the "new" E3 a way to salvage a show after big names (Sony, Nintendo, Microsoft, EA) pulled out? And is Lowenstein spinning this "evolution" of E3 on us? I have no idea. But I want more solid answers first, before I form a hair-brained idea.

The following is the original editorial.

Joystiq, Kotaku, and even Blogcritics thought it was necessary to report on the rumors that E3 was cancelled.

I have never understood the usefulness of reporting rumors as news, in the gaming space or otherwise. It is a fundamental flaw with all journalism and no one can be blamed, because everyone does it.

Sure, rumors have their place, but there are times when they seem way out of line. This was one of those times. Everyone was reporting how the sky was falling on the gaming industry.

All the while, I didn't jump the gun, and predicted a smaller show. And that seems like what is happening. I am getting sick and f-ing tired of all these gloom-and-doom reports (rumors). Frankly, blogs piss me off when it comes to this shit (see white PSP advert incident).

page 1 | 2
Ken Edwards is the Gaming Editor at Blogcritics, and calls Breaking Windows home. Ken works part time for Student Publications at BGSU as the Webmaster and System Administrator. He is also a freelance web developer.

Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
E3 2007 Not Canceled, Really?
Published: August 01, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Gaming
Writer: Ken Edwards
Ken Edwards's BC Writer page
Ken Edwards's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Ken Edwards
All Gaming Articles
Ken Edwards's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — April 25, 2007 @ 16:31PM — Ryan [URL]

I just have to say that this is a joke. E3 has always been about the fans, 60,000 of them, and cutting it down to 3-4,000 is beyond hilarious. I couldn't even believe my eyes as I read about the change (or cancellation, in my opinion) of E3. I work with a gaming website and have attended E3 for the past three years and now no longer want to go. It's going to be held in a hangar??? Come on. Much of the excitement is having it be in the LA Convention Center with many different halls and conference rooms for both media and fans. Having it held in a hangar in Santa Monica is just ridiculous. Who makes up the gaming industry, I ask you. Closing it to everyone, even though I'm still invited, is excluding the most important people and turning E3 into a country club meeting. Where is the fun in that? Where is the fun of the mass amount of media and showrooms. E3 can and has been personal, as I have had many quiet meetings with software developers above the brilliant show floor that wasn't located in some abandoned hangar. The point is, the people who make E3 happen want it all to themselves. In essence, we're seeing a display of obvious selfishness. I refuse to go.

#2 — April 25, 2007 @ 19:45PM — Ken Edwards [URL]

About the fans? Funny, I always thought E3 was a trade show.

#3 — April 26, 2007 @ 02:57AM — Matt Paprocki [URL]

Calling game journalists "fans" is part of the reason this entire situation happened in the first place.

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/51006)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments