<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Blogcritics Comments on CD Review: Queensryche - &lt;i&gt;Operation: Mindcrime II&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/</link>
<description>A sinister cabal of superior bloggers on music, books, film, popular culture, politics, and technology - updated continuously.</description>
<language>en</language>
<copyright>Copyright 2005-2007 by the authors</copyright>
<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 09:40:49 EDT</lastBuildDate>
<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
<generator>Blogcritics.org custom software</generator>

<item>
<title>Comment by Visitor on CD Review: Queensryche - &lt;i&gt;Operation: Mindcrime II&lt;/i&gt;</title>
<link>http://blogcritics.org/archives/2006/07/28/074046.php#comment-592743</link>
<description>I wonder if I&#039;m the only one to think that the main point of these two albums is about the traps a socially conscions person willing for a change must avoid. OMC 1 shows the political and moral dead end of terrorism a mean to change society once advocated by Blanqui, Che Guevara or Mao. OMC 2 does the same with the strategy of &quot;mingeling&quot; with the system, something advocated for by Bernstein, Mandel (and Mao too). They seem different but both happen when opportunism prevails over principles.
what do you think ?</description>
<guid isPermaLink="false">592743@blogcritics.org</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 09:40:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>