OPINION

The Commercial Space Industry Fails in Order to Succeed

Written by Howard Dratch
Published July 17, 2006
page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4

To test this hypothesis, Spencer sent an assistant out for a bag of popcorn. When the kernels were held in front of the magnetron, they exploded all over the lab. By 1947, Raytheon had built the first microwave oven, and in 1949 Spencer had received a patent for his new "method of preparing food."

David also profiles the giant, R. Buckminster Fuller:


Visit the Buckminster Fuller Institute


In 1927, R. Buckminster ("Bucky") Fuller was a failed businessman who was drinking too much, depressed about the death of his first daughter, and worried about how to take care of his family. That winter, while living in Chicago, he walked out to Lake Michigan to throw himself into its icy waters. "I said to myself, 'I've done the best I know how and it hasn't worked. I guess I'm just no good,'" he remembered. Fuller gave himself a choice: jump or think. He stood on the lakeshore for hours, finally deciding that he didn't have the right to kill himself. And so began Fuller's career as an inventor, thinker, and futurist.

The new race for the space business is no different. Ships will sit there or tumble over (remember Vanguard), there will be failures to launch and errors that cannot be anticipated. Yet the scientists and engineers who can deal with failure and use it to take the next step, who can see the accident for what it really means for some project will, in the end, prevail.

The photographer who shoots and sees that the story he/she wanted to tell was lost, the moment missed, the avenue of seeing not taken, and uses the failure to become Gary Winogrand, Lee Friedlander, or Robert Frank has used failure as a step toward the stars. The question is if there is creativity to see the possibilities of the failure and the guts to put it behind. The new space entrepreneurs may have it, probably have it. The government agencies are a question. Will NASA learn from its mistakes and tragedies as quickly and as well?

Clarebrough gets to advise emerging space entrepreneurs and write about the management of science-oriented businesses because he can write this:

With all this talk of failure, you might be thinking, “What’s wrong with success?” For sure, no company can survive for long unless it produces sustained success. The problem is that when something regularly works perfectly, we humans fall prey to deadly diseases—complacency followed by arrogance. When the rocket does blow up—which it will—we go into denial, making it harder, and taking longer, to learn the lessons. Even then we may resist learning and merely repeat what we did. There’s a saying in the business world: “To those whom the gods wish to destroy they first award forty years of success.” Maybe even three good launches in a year will do it.

page 1 | 2 | 3 | 4
Howard writes on science, books, movies and news for Blogcritics and on his own blogs from the border of North and Central America.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Commercial Space Industry Fails in Order to Succeed
Published: July 17, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Sci/Tech
Filed Under: Sci/Tech: Science, Sci/Tech: Space
Writer: Howard Dratch
Howard Dratch's BC Writer page
Howard Dratch's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
BC articles by Howard Dratch
Sci/Tech: Science
Sci/Tech: Space
All Sci/Tech Articles
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 18, 2006 @ 01:59AM — Aaman [URL]

Very interesting, Howard, please do cross-post this to DC

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/50458)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments