OPINION

The Invisible Audience: Canadian TV

Written by Diane Kristine
Published July 10, 2006

I covered the Banff World Television Festival last month because I'm interested in the behind-the-scenes workings of TV. I'm interested from the perspective of a kid who likes to take my toys apart to see how they work and I write about it from the viewpoint of a fan.

Even more than writing about the industry itself, I'd enjoy writing about the new homegrown show I'm enjoying — that is, if I knew about such a show in the first place; and enjoyed it in the second place. Those two events so rarely coincide, Halley's comet looks like a pest.

I've written before about the invisible networks, about realizing how little Canadian programming I stumble across, how difficult it is to even seek it out, and lamenting the fact that the poor Canadian industry can't compete against the giant American TV marketing machine.

But now that I'm motivated to at least be aware of what's out there in Canadian television so that I'm not overlooking programs I might enjoy and programs that might reflect stories I wouldn't otherwise see, I find that Canadian television does not seem to see me as its future.

At the Banff festival, I attended a town hall session on the future of Canadian TV with representatives from funders, regulators, content producers, and broadcasters, talking to an audience of the same. Now I think I understand another layer of the invisible networks problem. Listening to executives talk about my own country's product, I felt completely invisible. The discussion was focused on everything but the Canadian television viewer.

I'm not necessarily the typical viewer. At this point, I'm probably more motivated than average to seek out Canadian programming. Unfortunately, the reason for my recent motivation is not a reproducible marketing strategy: I got addicted to the blog of a Canadian television writer who's insightful, passionate, and funny about a wide range of subjects, but particularly the industry he works in. And he kept talking about shows I'd never heard of, like Jeff Ltd., Billable Hours and The Jane Show.

I started to be conscious of the fact that all these Canadian shows were appearing without a blip on my radar and wondered why. Was I just not paying attention? Or was the industry not paying attention to me?

That writer, Denis McGrath, ended up using me as a case study of how the industry is not reaching viewers (TV Mandarins Meet the Viewer: Part One and Part Two), and his questions probed the ways the industry has failed to connect to me in the present. On top of the discussions at Banff, I'm starting to feel the industry isn't particularly interested in connecting to me in the future, either.

Listening to executives fretting about international markets felt a little insulting. What about me? Wouldn't they like to make a TV show I might want to watch and then let me know about it so I can watch it? I heard "let's protect Canadian content in the scary new world of the unregulated Internet, but let's not make it too Canadian or we can't sell it."

page 1 | 2

Diane is a publications manager who's addicted to television, movies, and books and justifies her pop culture obsessions by writing about them for Blogcritics. She also runs the TV, Eh? website, a compilation of news and information about Canadian television series.
Keep reading for information and comments on this article, and add some feedback of your own!
The Invisible Audience: Canadian TV
Published: July 10, 2006
Type: Opinion
Section: Video
Filed Under: Video: Film and TV Business, Video: Television
Part of a feature: Banff World Television Festival
Writer: Diane Kristine
Diane Kristine's BC Writer page
Diane Kristine's personal site
Spread the Word
Like this article?
Email this
Submit to del.icio.us Save to del.icio.us
RSS Feeds
All RSS Feeds (240+)
Comments on this article
Articles in this series
BC articles by Diane Kristine
Video: Film and TV Business
Video: Television
All Video Articles
Diane Kristine's personal weblog
All Opinion articles
All BC articles
All BC Comments

Comments

#1 — July 10, 2006 @ 10:39AM — AlbertaLife [URL]

We have not done enough in terms of Canadian content, and a lot of the CanCon we have simply sucks (e.g., Jeff Ltd., which is a textbook example of what happens when untalented actors and writers get together).

I have been lamenting the lack of CanCon, and I have been calling for the adoption of European law, which states that you have to show 60% domestic content.

#2 — July 10, 2006 @ 10:50AM — Diane Kristine

I hate to say it, but I don't know that more Canadian content is the answer right now, when we can't produce and promote what is on the air now properly. I think we should focus on doing it right first, then doing more of it.

#3 — July 10, 2006 @ 13:11PM — Brent [URL]

Dianne, I'm not entirely convinced that both you and AlbertaLife aren't right and wrong at the same time. I think that there are loopholes in the regulations that need to be plugged, like the ones which allow networks to show a lot of their Cancon during the summer, and which define "peak viewing hours" (aka "prime time") in such a way that the evening and late night local newscasts count towards a station's peak viewing hour quota. Make the stations make the quota on a quarterly basis rather than an annual one is just one way to go. At the same time we need to find some way to encourage quality programming in shows that aren't co-productions with some foreign network or did we all forget the farce that was Canwest's "Adventures of Sinbad", shot in South Africa and money from All-American TV and with only a couple of Canadian Actors and government money to make it "Canadian".

Want comments emailed to you? No spam, promise! Address:

Add your comment, speak your mind

(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/50181)

Personal attacks are not allowed. Please read our comment policy.





Remember Name/URL?

Please preview your comment!

Fresh
Articles
Fresh
Comments