Satire: ALCU Set To Fight Heterosexual Acts Ban in World Court!
Published July 03, 2006
The current American President could not be reached for comment as he is still on his six-month vacation on his plantation in Southern Mississippi. Former President G.W. Bush, who had been called upon to broker the original World Law representing the U.S. could not be reached for comment. However his representatives quoted him as saying that “The ALCU has always been a thorn of the side of moral Americans trying to earn a decent living wage.” When asked what that had to do with the question, his secretary only stated he had nothing more to add.
This reporter has discovered documentation from an undisclosed source that indicates that originally this World Law was proposed to slow or stop the growing Hispanic and Black populations in the U.S. from becoming a majority of the populace, while secretly breeding whites at undisclosed locations to increase their numbers, thus assuring a future solid majority.
This reporter for one, and on a personal note, is aghast at the massive amount of taxpayer dollars that will have been spent setting up separate male and female villages that were necessary to bring our burgeoning population under control, only to have a leftist liberal and obviously backward organization such as the ALCU try to undo God’s moral work in our great country.
Jet is the not yet published author of two spy novels, SYSTEM 10 and its sequel GHOST OF A CHANCE, and a professional artist. He likes to collect books, music, chess sets, and friends. Favorite quote: "Evil only succeeds when good men do nothing."
In 2004 his "good life" came to an abrupt end with a robbery and near-fatal beating. He now works as a writer/artist on disability.
- Satire: ALCU Set To Fight Heterosexual Acts Ban in World Court!
- Published: July 03, 2006
- Type: Satire
- Section: Politics
- Filed Under: Culture: Humor and Satire, Culture: Religion, Politics: Policy
- Writer: Jet Gardner
- Jet Gardner's BC Writer page
- Jet Gardner's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments on this articleComments
Time to kill all hetrosexual troublemakers sr!!!!
Long live the revolution
yer a very silly man...and something should be done...
somethiign involving vast amounts of body surface covered in peanut butter and a horde of pomeranians
too twisted for color tv (from "Steel Magnolias")
Excelsior?
I believe the peanut-butter/pomeranian combo is illegal in 11 states.
Good God you actually did the research?
Don't knock it till you've tried it!
Che#6 I believe that's only if they're males and it has to be the low-calorie/ low fat stuff
Who says I haven't tried it?
Actually I prefer the "all natural" peanut-butter, home ground. The oiliness gives it a very pleasant texture, its easier to wash off, and it leaves the skin silky smooth. Its also healthier for the pomeranians.
So... after all that what did you think of the article Che?
The tangent was not my fault - gonzo started it.
Yes... I took it too far. I hang my head in shame.
As for the article, very funny, but I'm just wondering whats going to happen to us poor bi folk in your fabricated future.
Gonzo Gonzo it's always Gonzo's fault-those damned heterosexual troublemakers there otta be a laW.
Bi huh? Have you checked out my novelization of Brokeback Mountain where I really get into their heads, there's all those x-rated sex scenes, and then I extend the ending all the way out to Ennis' death in 2006? just click my URL
I'd value you opinion...
I read all your work Jet. And enjoy it very much, except for one little complaint I have. do you want to hear it?
Of course as long as there's no malice involved...
No malice, just a personal point of view. *deep breath* Here goes:
Yep, I support gay rights, gay marriage, the whole shebang, 100%. But.....
"Its not my choice!" seems to have become a gay catchphrase these days, one intended to placate the irate right-winger who sneeringly refers to homoSEXuality as a "lifestyle choice". I remember in one comment you wrote something to the effect of "who would choose to be oppressed, spurned, etc etc etc..." can't really find the quote right now. The answer to that question is... well... me.
No I'm not saying I chose to be "oppressed". But many many many years ago I did choose not to limit my intimate relationships according to superficial criteria like gender, race or age (and no you fucking pervos, I'm not talking about kids, I'm just talking about the age of consenting adults, whether 18 or 80), despite the probability of oppression. So, a lot of people would label me bisexual and out of convenience I often use the term to refer to myself though I more often prefer the term bi-relational.
I'm not promiscuous- too old and tired to be promiscuous. I've had loving, rewarding, long-term relationships with both men and women. But it was my choice to do so and I've lived my life according to my personal values and philosophies. And it wasn't a "life-style" choice. Life is not a "style", like a pair of shoes you can take on or off. Life-altering decisions are important, how one chooses to bond with other people is an important and meaningful decision, one that gets belittled everytime a well-meaning queer yells, "its not my choice! no one would choose this!"
For most gay men, it isn't a choice. There is plenty of evidence that gay men are born gay. But please be considerate of those of us who HAVE made a deeply important decision about such issues as relationships and intimacy.
There seems to be less evidence of lesbians being born lesbian. I'm not saying it isn't the case - many may well be but the jury's still out on that one. I do know that some lesbians are indeed lesbian by choice, for political reasons, or emotional reasons. Many feminist-seperatists embrace lesbianism as an alternative to heterosexist relationships - some temporarily, and some for the rest of their lives. I lived for a time in an all-woman's community where many of the women there had opted to engage in lesbian relationships for political reasons.
Its very easy for gay people to say things like "oh she was always that way" or my favourite: "bisexuality is just a stage he's going through". If its a stage, I've been going through it for 25 years. I simply don't understand the need on the part of some gays to belittle the sexual and relational experiences of others. You can't know whats in the heart of other people - don't belittle or dismiss their experiences and choices as irrelevant.
Being gay is not your choice. I accept that, and respect it. I believe it. The least you can do is respect that I have made a choice.
I'm probably going to get slammed for saying all this, because the gays seem to want to convince Mr Tidy-rightie that they're born that way, believing it will give their right to equality more weight if it turns out to be nature's doing. But choice is being turned into an ugly word these days, and I believe that whether its nature or choice it should be respected. Sexuality and capacity for intimacy is very complex, and for some people can be quite flexible.
Bi, huh? he says.
Yeah.
when I said "Bi-Huh?" I meant I didn't know you weren't straight and nothing more by it. As for a choice, Yes I believe for women it is a choice, just because society accepts a relationship between two women more than two men so they're free to have that option. Most men's fantasies involve having two women and if they get it on with eachother at the same time he's working on them so much the better. So men/society accepts lesbianism more, so it's an easy choice for her.
Two completely heterosexual women can walk down the street holding hands and no one thinks anything of it, or two mother-types can even kiss in public and they go practically unnoticed.
Males on the other hand can be either biological- or a choice-Why? we carry both the x and the y chromosome, that's why men have nipples etc. Biologically and undeniably men are both part woman and man right down to their chromosomes.
there is a vast gray area of sexuality and it's rare to find a man on the extreem end of either completely straight or gay. I'm very near the extreem of being gay, because that's what my hormones react to, I react emotionally to both sexes and think I could have a loving relationship with a woman, but not a sexual one.
Offer any man no matter how macho a million cash tax free to strip and have sex with another man for 5 minutes, and they might not like it, but they'll do it.
There's no shame of being sexually attracted to both sexes, but the problem lies when you try to make an emotional commitment to one or the other, knowing you want both.
I can commit myself to a man without wanting another man on the side, but it gets complicated emotionally when you're bi because the woman tends to get more than a little jealous when her man is unconsciously checking out other guys and she can't find a way to compete with that.
In other words emotionally a guy can compete with another guy, a woman can compete with another woman trying to horn in on her territory, but she has trouble figuring out how to compete with another man without a sex-change operation.
straight men have a hard time wrapping their minds around Bi men because they figure once you've had another man you're "stained" for life.
gays despite what you thing are more accepting, that's why the B in GLBT stands for!
Oh I'm not saying gays aren't accepting but it has taken a while for the gay community to gain a better understanding of bisexuality. And there are still those who think its a "stage" or think its a form of denial or whatever. I'm just saying that by pandering to the right by insisting gaydom is nature, only nature, and can't be any other way sort of shoves people who've made their choices right out the door.
I want to see gays have equal rights and the right to marry. My best friend is a gay dad to a teenage girl. He'd like very much to marry his partner so that his entire family has the same benefits as nuclear hetero families and I would so love to see that happen - its about damn time he found a man I approve of. But I also want to reclaim the word "choice" as something important and beautiful, rather than frivolous and easily dismessed.
Like I say, I read your articles faithfully, and enjoy them all. I just wanted to bring up the thing about choice. Its not a dirty word folks.
And offer me a million cash to strip naked, smear myself with peanut butter and submit to a horde of pomeranians, colour me there.
In my case my emotions give me a choice, my hormones don't-I envy you your choice but at the same time it hurts when those of us that didn't make one are accused of it.
You're right the day will come soon when it won't matter, but not before the dead weight of all the old asshole fundamentalist bible pounders with their hatred and thousands of year-old attitudes have shrivvled up and died will that happen.
It's going on 3:30 AM here in ohio, I'm exhausted.
take care my friend until another time. Drop my my URL and leave a comment on what you thought of my version of the story.
Jet
I think what it boils down to is that both you and I want to be recognised and accepted for who we are.
Oh and I've read several of your brokeback mountain installments here on BC and thought they were great. I'll check out your site so I can get the full picture.
Someday Che, Someday. I'm glad this made you laugh, the novelization will make you think with all the revisions. You'll also love the big pictures.
Che makes some very excellent points that are skipped by many on the far edges of the Discussion
there are some who are not affected by gender, but rather are attrated to the person inside, not the plumbing outside
this is just as valid as anything else
there are also the polyamorous...which can lead to problems, but not if the stigma is removed, and all involved are Aware and consenting
on and on
each and every facet of inter-personal relationships that involve consenting adults are valid, and should not be looked down upon or discounted
frankly, it's nobody else's business but those involved
but that's just one old, broken down, hetero talking...
your mileage may vary
Excelsior?
Thank you Gonzo, For us-being bi is a lot like a guy who has the looks that he can pass for black or white and he can make a conscious choice which way he wants to "pass".
Sometimes in a way we gays resent that bi's have that choice.
Personally I neither resent it or judge it.
In my case the "decision" wasn't made for me... I'd have to choose to be straight.
I'll repeat that we accept bi's though as our GLBT monicor says.
C'mon guys the article was supposed to make you laugh!!!!!!
Gonzo wrote: frankly, it's nobody else's business but those involved... Then why are so many of them deterined to be involved?
cuz there are a lot of nosy bastiches in the World, Jet
oh yes...and the tooth fairy is not some guy in a tutu wiht pixie wings and a wand, either...
sorry to be the bearer of bad news...
{8^P~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~`
Excelsior?
Sex is great fun, but there's nothing more boring than discussion OTHER peoples sex lives.
Dave
for comment #25...
for most people, i would Agree....but it seems to be the only thing a percentage of GOP legislators and noise machine employees can talk about...usually starting 6 months before election time...
Excelsior?
Dave, are you a member of FARTS? or something? This was supposed to make you laugh!
Gonzo took the words out of my mouth, it only is an issue around election time, and only to bring blind bus loads of evangelical voters out who were preprogramed on how to vote republican....
each and every facet of inter-personal relationships that involve consenting adults are valid, and should not be looked down upon or discounted
Amen to that!
This was supposed to make you laugh!
But it can only be a good thing when humorous material gives rise to serious discussion.
Che, Archie Bunker made us laugh at Racism to make us see how rediculous it is, I was trying to do the same for Homophobes by turning the subject back on them.
hey now Jet, you know the homophobes ain't gonna turn their back on YOU!!!
they ain't gonna drop the soap either...
but i digress...
Excelsior?
You know this is loosely based on a place I took a tour of when I was a kid near Sewickley Pa. The were convinced that God was coming and separated the men and women and they eventually died out waiting for him.
Their are laws on the books that actually call sodomy oral or anal sex between men and women illegal-when the religious right is done with us, who do you think they'll come after next?
Che, Archie Bunker made us laugh at Racism to make us see how rediculous it is, I was trying to do the same for Homophobes by turning the subject back on them.
Um... yeah I got that.
I'm just saying, humor can be thought-provoking and prompt serious discussions, ay?
Yep, did you see the new title page for the novelization I did on my URL? it came out fuzzy, but if you click on it, it gets bigger and clearer and the rest of the pictures?
I'd really value your opinion...
You need prozac...
Made me laugh.
You did leave out the point that heterosexuals took this land from the Indians.
Interesting point, Maurice; personally I always wondered, given the apparent scarcity of women during the conquest of America, just what all those macho men did for sexual relief out on the dusty trail...
Why do you thing the Lone Ranger's horse reared up in fear every time he yelled "Hi-o-Silver!"
Chris back in frontier days it was common and acceptable for cowboys to dance, live, bunk and sleep together for warmth, company and even sexual gratification. A man's lover was known as his "Side-Kick" or a "Howdy Pardner"
I was only after roving preachers took over that it was frowned upon. Hell Abraham Lincoln regularly slept nightly with his secret-service man instead of his wife and no on batted an eye!
Joey prozac is made by heteros for heteros-there ARE some things I won't put in my mouth!!!
So what you're saying, Jet, is that the USA was born gay? Cool!
Oh come on Chris wake up and smell the coffee, all those guys in powdered wigs and Franklin's peticoats?
Pullllllease!!!
In the world of nature the male is always the prettiest from tropical fish, to birds to humans!
And... in the world of nature the males procreate with the females. Don't forget that little bitty part of the greater scheme of things. Sorry... just had to throw that in there somewhere.
Of course you did sweetie and how wonderful of you to do so here. It's also a fact of nature that homosexual coupling amoungst all of God's creatures is common.
Condor: WRONG! Animals are often gay or bi too!! Gay Rights for Animals!!!
Death to all hetrosexual trouble making zoo keepers!!!
Geeeesh!!! Look up the word procreate...
then you'll get it. Get it?
BRING ON THE NUKES. THE UNBORN GAY WHALES JUST EVOLVED LEGS AND ARE HEADING TO A CITY NEAR YOU. MOTHERS GRAB YOUR CHILDREN, THIS COULD GET HGLY. SAVE US FROM THIS INVASION ACLU.
Condor if you don't like the subject matter that go the fuck elsewhere!
That's nice sr, but what did you think of the article and it's the ALCU
What article? ALCU IS BACKWARDS FOR UCLA.
Jet
You're the one who got all Darwinian with the males are the most colorful statement... I finished in pure Darwinian logic by stating that...
A. It was true that males are the most colorful
B. It is also true that animals seek to procreate
C. And that it is common knowledge, of which you choose to ignore.
Go launch a virago on someone else. I go where I want to.
I bet you're a member of FARTS aret you Condor? Ah just another hetro libber trying to make trouble!
You'll never know, keep guessing.
My guess is... you need a happy meal.
Hey don't scoff-the Federal American Research Trends Study is a very prestigeous organization. Some of the finest Hetrosexual minds work there.
I'm almost afraid to ask what that last deleted comment was about, I got it in my e-mail notification, but fortunately it's not here.
Much appreciated Chris...
Jet
I probably don't have to guess who it came from either.
THOSE DAMNED HETROSEXUAL TROUBLEMAKERS ARE AT IT AGAIN!!!!! ARGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!
wern't me. I've been outta town and I shot par for 3 days straight. thank you, thank you very much. yeeeeahhhh!!!!!
This article wasn't in fresh comments-so you had to dig to find it, to leave your little message-any explanation of why?
What the heck are you talking about Jet? I am perfectly capable of navigating beyone "fresh comments"... and just by using the scroll tab too!
Besides, you amuse me. And if I take an interest in an article I follow it to until it disappears from the tabbed page. Ican even search archived matieral... which I do if I'm looking for music or washing machine reviews. Geeesh!
Also... I prefer your Science articles... you're too cynical in your approach to satire. Granted, satire is supposed to evoke the use of sarcasm, or keen wit in denouncing abused or follies, or ridicule and it as defined should be written in a manner which vice, folly, or incapacity is held up to ridicule. Now Art Buchwald was a satirist.... you need some buffing up laddy.
AMF! Just for your sake.... I won't visit this particular article anymore... as it annoys you.
As long as you're enjoying yourself, call me all the names you want. I doubt it's true that you won't be coming back, but I can only hope.
I know I'm in danger of being labeled a pedophobic bigot!
But are they about to outlaw pedophile acts too?
Hope is not a method... (and I lied) However, I'm not giving you the last word on your attempt at a smear tactic... additionally... I am taking offense to your insinuation that I left some type of derogatory comment.
That's not my style.
Jet, thought you had some nukes in your arsenal.
HAVE NUKE WILL TRAVEL WIRE PALADIN(sr) FLORIDA
That damned hetrosexual Kim Jung Il got married?
Headline-Phelps arrested by FBI after Bush gets tongue tied trying to rail against the ALCU!
Down with the ALCU join FARTS while you still can!
Hey-Lieberman's a Bush hetrosexual, how can you trust someone like that anyway?
I bet every one of the people arrested in London were hetrosexuals-there aught to be a law against that kind of behaviour
Dennis Hastert is a Heterosexual!?! At first I didn't believe it because he's a Republican.
Frankly I'm surprised that Bush hasn't ordered all flags to half staff for Falwell!
Square water melons and genetically engineered food are samples that once in a while, life is created. Not a proof, but a plausibility.
Here Dan, read this article and look at yourself in a slightly different mirror...
Sirus is in the ACLU??? Here's a reading assignment for you Silus... enjoy
Add your comment, speak your mind
(Or ping: http://blogcritics.org/mt/tb/49940)
Okay kids this oughta raise some fir!