DVD Review: Elaine May's The Heartbreak Kid
Published June 25, 2006
The movie then switches gears after Lenny divorces Lila and tracks Kelly to her campus. He's no longer dodging a woman but chasing one, and the movie now takes on the structure of romantic comedy, i.e., winning the girl over her father's objections. But only the structure. When Lenny finds Kelly, she's not only surprised to see him but committed to one of the college guys she's walking with. Kelly's father (Eddie Albert) made it plain in Florida that he didn't like Lenny and in Minnesota he makes it explicit that he loathes him and is willing to pay him to go away. Lenny tells Mr. Corcoran that he's the most determined young man he's ever met, but we can't help feeling that knowing what you want and having the determination to get it are different from having a reason for wanting what you want.
All of which is to say that Lenny is one of the most purely ambiguous ironic protagonists in American movies. Simon makes Lenny more blocked than he is in Friedman's story (in which Lenny confronts every impediment head-on), but he doesn't make him loveable. And it may be a certain female sensitivity that enables May to remain skeptical about her protagonist. (That's her "daughter" he's dumping.) In any event, Simon and May's detachment is beautifully assured. Lenny is the protagonist because you're eager to know what he's going to do, even though you don't wish you were in his shoes.
Of course, Kelly's a beauty, and Shepherd has a wonderful comic style — she provokes reactions and then sits back and watches with ambiguous amusement — but even Kelly realizes that Lenny has read too much into their passing, holiday "relationship." And yet he's so overread it, so energetically, that he becomes fascinating to her. (Simon's script doesn't emphasize why the Jewish man's walking-talking dream would be the WASPiest girl he could find. Nor does the script go into why the Jewish Lila would be such a nightmare of ordinariness to Lenny. But then neither does Simon supply pat answers or arbitrary reconciliations, for once. In other words, Simon isn't Philip Roth, but his work here is unusually sophisticated for him. It's his driest work by far.)
The Heartbreak Kid is thus not a romantic comedy in which the couple seem made for each other; that's part of the detachment by which we recognize it as irony. This puts it well ahead of The Graduate (1967), directed by Mike Nichols, who was May's former comedy partner. The problem with the The Graduate as compared to The Heartbreak Kid is that it goes back and forth in how it views its protagonist Benjamin (Dustin Hoffman), the recent college graduate who returns home to the materialistic wasteland of his parents' L.A. and doesn't know what to do with himself. At times Benjamin is a nullity, bubbling on the bottom of the pool in his new scuba gear, for instance, and at times he's a slapstick cluck, helpless in the hands of his parents' predatory married friend Mrs. Robinson (Anne Bancroft). But then in his pursuit of Elaine (Katherine Ross), Mrs. Robinson's daughter, Benjamin becomes a romantic hero, and yet there's no particular reason why we should want Benjamin and Elaine to be together or why Elaine would represent redemption from nullity for him.
- DVD Review: Elaine May's The Heartbreak Kid
- Published: June 25, 2006
- Type: Review
- Section: Video
- Filed Under: Video: Comedy, Video: Classics
- Writer: Alan Dale
- Alan Dale's BC Writer page
- Alan Dale's personal site
- Spread the Word
- Like this article?
- Email this
Save to del.icio.us
Comments
Thanks for the comment. That is a great scene; there are so many funny variations on awkward in the movie. I don't know why it isn't more popular.
Did you ever see May's follow-up, Mikey and Nicky? One of my favorites Quite an enormous contrast in every way to Heartbreak Kid. You wouldn't know they came from the same director.
Hope to say more later on Heartbreak Kid rather than just the cursory comment. I need to see it again first.
P.S. Except, come to think of it, both Heartbreak and Mikey and Nicky are stories told, very convincingly, from a male point of view. See, that was anothing thing about Mikey, that you wouldn't think it was directed by a woman because it seems to understand -- without being harshly judgmental in a feminist sense -- the male perspective. I guess in a way the same is true of Heartbreak. Both present somewhat unsavory males -- or maybe let's just say men behaving badly -- without some echoing snort of disapproval. A bit like Lena Wertmuller perhaps? (Just thinking aloud.)
I saw The Heartbreak Kid at the AFI Theatre, which showed all four of the movies May has directed. The mini-festival occurred during my mother's week-long visit, however, and Mikey and Nicky was one I just couldn't sell her on. It sounds a lot like a Cassavetes movie, which is a weak sell even to me. But since you recommend it so highly, it's next up on Netflix.
I agree with your take on the non-feminist clear-sightedness of May's treatment of ironic male protagonists. Wertmüller strikes me as different, for a couple of reasons. One, she's more didactic, and cruder. May works her material up from improvisational, observational comedy routines. She turns shtick into something resembling naturalism. Wertmüller starts with left-wing attitudes and turns political conflicts into something resembling cartoons. Second, Wertmüller is on the side of her male protagonists. Giannini, in any case, as the earthy prole as opposed to Mariangela Melato's bitchy bourgeoise in Swept Away, and even as the pimp internee as opposed to Shirley Stoler's obese Nazi commandant in Seven Beauties. Wertmüller takes a much harsher view of women than May: who ever heard of a female commandant of a Nazi concentration camp?
They are totally different in a broad sense, but alike in that they can project or approximate male experience at a raw, visceral level.
(Although raw isn't really the word for Heartbreak -- let's say penetrating, empathetic. Both can credibly inhabit a certain kind of male perspective.)
How clearly and deeply you investigated "Heartbreak Kid"! It's a film I've long appreciated - I watch it several times a year - and I'm excited to see it's specialness celebrated and to have my perceptions of it sharpened. (By the way, Jeannie Berlin seems to feel as kindly toward Cybill Shepherd as Lila might have Kelly; I met Berlin last year and, dazzled and delighted, asked her to sign my "HK" DVD, the one with Grodin and Shepherd on the cover: "You want me to sign a picture of Cybill Shepherd?!?!" she gasped. The conversation was barely salvaged) ......What are your thoughts on May's "A New Leaf"?......Also, I thought your "52 pickup" metaphor in reference to "Mikey and Nicky" was both funny and apt......As far as I can tell, you are the most interesting guy writing about films online. I'll keep reading, I'm sure.
Thanks for the praise, John. Tell all your friends! The anecdote about Berlin is hilarious. I'm glad The Heartbreak Kid has such a devoted fan. It deserves more.
As for A New Leaf, May herself is good, doing slapstick clumsiness slower and with more feminine sweetness than usual. And some of the scenes are brilliant, e.g., Matthau in his lawyer's office. But generally I couldn't get past the almost universal miscasting. All those Jewish and Italian comics as Wall Street and Park Avenue old-money types. A bizarre kind of cognitive dissonance.
"doing slapstick clumsiness slower and with more feminine sweetness than usual" - more often than not, slapstick clumsiness slops over into the manic. May makes Henrietta paradoxically graceful...You've got to love the moment when Beckett the lawyer decides that "You have no money" sums up Henry's situation as well as any other turn of phrase... Your remarks about the casting ring true; personally, I have a hard time buying James Coco (born 1930) as Walter Matthau's (born 1920) imperious uncle.
What struck me about Lenny was his inability to learn from his mistakes. He goes through life rushing headlong into things and in his haste he often comes so close to ruining his life. He rushed into the army and in a scene with Kelly admitted it was a mistake and it took him 3 years to be discharged. He then dove into his marriage with Lila without taking the time to become familiar with her annoying traits. You'd think by now the jerk would have learned his lesson but what did he do? He again plowed full throttle into another marriage, allowing himself to be swept up by Kelly's beauty without taking the time to pick up on her quirks. This was evident when Lenny told Kelly's father "one good look did it". Kelly's not an overly bright character and I'll bet a girl of her type would eventually grate on Lenny's nerves just like Lila did. After a while Kelly's beauty would become commonplace to Lenny and then what appeal would she have for him?
How long do you all think such a marriage would last? I'd give it a year.
This a movie every young person should see BEFORE they get married. There's a very important lesson to be learned. Get to know your future mate before you tie the knot!
Midnight Cowboy and HK are my two favorite movies of all time.
Dear Pratt, Thanks for the comment. I agree about Lenny's inability to learn from mistakes, or perhaps to learn only from mistakes. That's why I identify with him.
I'm interested to know how you reconcile liking The Heartbreak Kid and Midnight Cowboy so much?













The dinner table scene is one of my absolute favorites, where Lenny tries to impress Kelly's parents by blathering on about how "honest" the food. {"There's no lying in those potatoes. There's no deceit in that cauliflower.") Grodin, Albert, Lindley, Shepherd and especially Berlin are all perfectly cast, and the whole movie has a great screwball flair to it.